Closed-door meeting to discuss new council rules
Eight members of the next City Council are meeting behind these closed doors this afternoon, barring reporters from their pre-swearing in session.
Members of the 40th City Council are meeting behind closed doors this afternoon to discuss what Mayor-elect Mark Mallory calls "internal process issues."
On the agenda is a memo by Councilman-elect Jeff Berding, who wants to make broad changes to the council rules. The following is the text of the Berding memo:
Cincinnati City Council
Proposed Rules Committee Action Items
Standing Committees
Finance
Law and Public Safety
Economic Development
Vibrant Neighborhoods, Environment and Public Services
Arts, Culture, Tourism and Marketing
Education, Health and Recreation
Rules Committee should be merged in with Committee on Committees. We do not need 2 "housekeeping" procedural committees. Rules Committee will be responsible for membership of committees and jurisdiction of committees.
Council Sunset Rule
Have solicitor draft a sunset provision into Council Rules -- so that all matters pending in committee shall NOT be turned over to successive committees. Each new Council starts anew with council business and thus must give affirmative vote of Council majority or new committee majority to take up old items as new items of business on calendar.
Conduct of Business
Council will end the practice of by-leaves or emergency by-leaves. Have time on agenda for announcements only. This would be for largely informational and ceremonial matters. No legislative issues may be taken up that are not on the calendar. Motions, communications, resolutions and ordinances should go to Committee for consideration through the legislative process after being assigned to committee by the Mayor.
Motion becomes an ordinance
Motion drafted by a Council member should NOT be referred to appropriate department in administration for analysis and preparation of report UNLESS motion is signed by 4 Council members or the Chair of Committee with jurisdiction on topic and 1 other Council member.
5.3 & 5.4 Preservation of order and Appeals from Decision of Chair -- we should have a trained parliamentarian at every meeting.
6.3 Limitation of Debate -- No member shall be allowed to speak more than once on any one subject. (delete until every other member choosing to speak thereon shall have spoken). Limit member comments to 3 minutes.
Without Recommendation
Report that was reviewed in committee and not approved should NOT be placed on calendar.
Council Calendar -- Items must be on agenda, and Council members should be required to file proposed amendments to Mayor/Manager by 10 AM morning of Committee/Council session.
Committee Meetings -- Committee chairs should have the authority to schedule meetings and set agenda for Committee hearings.
7.12 -- Referrals to City Manager -- Constituent matters must be directed to city manager for follow-up. Similar to motions, requests for information should go to manager instead of department heads. These requests for reports or information need to be signed by Committee chairs with jurisdiction on that matter or a majority of Council members, with a "1-hour rule exception" so that basic informational items that require less than 1 hour of staff time can be requested directly by any Council member to the Manager.
2.6 Citizens' Forum
Give the chair the ability to limit public appearances to one per month. If a person has spoken in that month, then speaking card can be passed over if other members of public seeking to speak.
3.6 Allocation of Office Space -- Council rules on this subject do not cover new members. Council should establish that offices for new members will be based on order of finish in the citywide race.
5 Comments:
I have been saying this from DAY ONE. Berding is going to be even a bigger disaster than Christopher Smitherman. From the moment he was elected, he will know go about everything like he is in charge....he is now our mayor, city manager, president of Council, etc.
We're all in trouble cause it's gonna be all about Berding for the next two years....this selfish man is going to hurt our City.
What disappoints me is that Mallory allowed the closed door meeting. I thought he was a supporter of a more open government. The way our city council is run should be an open discussion so that we, the citizens can play an active role in our local government. I am disappointed in the council-elect for pulling this stunt.
While I believe strongly that closed government is anathema to good government (a concept that the original Charterites understood but its more recent elected officials seem to have forgotten), I'm willing to keep an open mind about the new regime.
If they pull this kind of stunt after tomorrow, people should be outraged.
I'm not happy with this initial "closed door meeting" business. Makes me wonder how many more of these styled meetings will take place over the next four years.
I remember when the Citizens Complaint Authority started up & representatives from the Black Bellyaching Bloc - Livingston & Mike Bailey - threatened & harangued them with "Sunshine Law" rhetoric.
It remains to be seen if they'll bully their boy Mallory. However, I'm not surprised that the public door was slammed in the faces of the public who voted him in. Not surprised at all. There'll be plenty more surprises - we're just getting started here.
I think the complaints about the closed doors meeting are out of line. It's clear that this council is trying its best to work together, and this is obviously the place to start. Personally, I think that the 3 minute time limit on council member speeches is rather ridiculous, but the fact is that this is a board meeting of ten people, not a debating society (all the important discussion can and will, and probably already does, take place between individuals in conversation), for better or for worse (I doubt the quality of debate will suffer any from this rule, simply because it wasn't terribly high to begin with, and debate time was not discursive so much as a play to the Citicable cameras).
I agree however that Berding is a potential menace. Having worked with the man I suspect him of all sorts of poor motives, though I must say I admire his choice of committees to chair. Typically underhanded and sneaky. Clever, really. While for fairness sake I must grant him the possibility that he may do positive things, this is straight from his playbook: twist the rules and engage in backroom deals to promote his own limited and selfish ends.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.
<< Home