*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Monday, November 12, 2007

An "Incredible Squandering" of Tax Dollars?

On the agenda for Cincinnati City Council's neighborhoods committee Wednesday: a letter from Jeffrey Bakst, an attorney in Mount Auburn who writes about what he calls "a complete lack of management in our city and the incredible squandering of valuable dollars..."

Here's what he says happened in "this very upsetting event," according to a September letter to council members:

In the last year, the city tore up the sidewalks from Kinsey Avenue down past Reading Road. The replacement sidewalks were beautiful.

But on Sept. 18, he drove to his office at Auburn and Kinsey avenues and found city workers tearing up the new sidewalks that had been put in seven months before.

Apparently the tearing-up was for a new gas line, "which is certainly a good thing for our community. However, it is quite obvious there was no planning done whatsoever, no attempt to cooperate with utility companies or visa versa....it has caused me great aggravation and damage to my property and wasted thousands of dollars. Regardless, you better start to take heed of what you are doing in the city or we are sure to go down the tubes. This was nothing short of gross mismanagement and it has cost the tax payers many thousands of dollars. Isn't it time that this kind of waste stops."


13 Comments:

at 5:57 PM, November 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Has it cost the taxpayers thousands of dollars? Did you even check who's footing the bill?

Or do you just post any whack-jobs letter that he CCs you on?

I suspect the latter. Anything that makes the city look bad, regardless of facts. Gannett isn't really known for its fact-checking.

 
at 6:32 PM, November 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.

When it comes to 'gas' this guy is a 'beano' counter !

Duh, maybe the deteriorated gas line was not discovered until after the concrete 'poor' !

This is what happens when you have, wRong wingnut whacko, 'cronies' on the county payroll !

Hello, DUKE is a corporation !

PATHETIC

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 7:19 PM, November 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This what happens when the foot-tapping bold typist sits in the City Hall Restroom and sniffs the wrong type of gas all day long.

 
at 7:46 PM, November 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Justin Jeffre would NEVER have let this happen.

Justin was robbed! Recount!

 
at 8:38 PM, November 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bakst didn't read the info very carefully that was sent by Miller Pipeline, Duke Energy's contractor for the gas line installation.

It's printed clear as day that properties will be restored to the condition it was in before the installation took place. Currently, sidewalks that have been torn out have a tarpath. That will be replaced with a standard sidewalk.

As for who is footing the costs, it's Duke Energy's project, but customers will have to absorb that on the utility bills. Count on it. Bakst's out in left field when he claims this is a taxpayer eating banquet. And, uh, the updated gas lines are an improvement for the city's infrastructure. Some of the lines being replaced are ancient & could pose catastrophic risks. Bakst's office blows off the foundation because of a rusty, deteriorated, ancient pipeline, he'd have something else to whine about.

 
at 8:47 PM, November 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I find my self in a quandary... I'm partially agreeing with bold italics dude (all but his normal ignorant republican hate...)

Working for another local government, most of the time we do not know that Duke plans to replace a gas main until they submit a right-of-way permit. I'm sure there was precautions taken to try to prevent removal of the sidewalk after the permit was applied for but due to other utilities, right-of-way issues, roadway geometry, etc. that may have been the only place to put the line in.

And Mr. Bakst apparently doesn't understand that city employees don't install gas lines. It's Duke (and normally a subcontractor for Duke, at that.) And Duke will pay for the re-replacement walks.

Our agency contacts and works with Duke and other utilities on major capital improvements. I really doubt a sidewalk replacement would warrant utility coordination so Duke may have not been notified or at the time Duke did not plan to replace the gas line. I've done a project where Duke decided to replace the gas line at the last minute (and delayed the project.) Sometimes with Duke you never know.

 
at 8:18 AM, November 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

In Clifton Heights the City had a big push to repave our streets; only to have Duke come in this spring and dig them up to replace the gas lines. Having been in the construction trades my whole adult life I know not to put the plumbing in after the drywall goes up. The fact that there is apparently no communication between the City and the utilities that use our right of ways, does a number of bad things. First, it does waste money; either ours as tax payers or, ours as energy consumers. It costs twice as much to do it twice no matter how you slice it. Second it creates the impression that someone downtown, is getting kickbacks from someone in the paving business or concrete business, to not do their job. I mean how hard is it to get on the phone and call the utilities up and ask what the replacement schedule is on their underground equipment?

 
at 9:00 AM, November 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The same thing happened on Isabella in Oakley. They put in all new curbs and paved the street, only for it all to be chopped up later for gas lines. Now the pavement is uneven and it is unsightly!

Even if it doesn't cost the city any money, SOMEONE is losing money from this kind of waste! And at the very least: (i) the citizens suffer b/c they have to deal with 2 or more construction projects,and less than beautiful results; and (ii) there is a waste of physical resources, which can't be good for the environment.

 
at 11:07 AM, November 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

a heckuva fine point and article and post but remember all of you voted in just recently the same group of council members.

Helllooo??????

 
at 12:18 PM, November 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The same thing is happening in Northside on Virgina Ave.between Chase and Kirby. New gas line are being installed and the work is tearing up a resently rehabed street that included new cutters and sidewalks.

 
at 1:13 PM, November 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
"...I'm partially agreeing with bold italics dude (all but his normal...republican hate...)..."

"...when the bold typist sits in...City Hall..."

dude, his = gender bias ?

Thanks for acknowledging whom the wRong wingnut whackos are !

Thanks for making 'bold endeavors' the most important element in your posts !

Oh, it's hard to be humble !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 5:10 PM, November 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

("Anonymous said...a heckuva fine point and article and post but remember all of you voted in just recently the same group of council members.")

This one gets dumped in the lap of Milton Dohoney, our city manager who has oversight over city operations. Council isn't allowed to interject into daily operations. If Dohoney isn't looking for a place to plant a boot, over this, then he's not doing his job either

 
at 6:56 AM, November 15, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree. Dahoney needs to earn his keep on matters like these. To his defense (I guess) this has been happening over the years. In Hartwell, we have brand new curbs, storm drains, and pavings being uprooted by sewer work and soon to be gas lines?? I say go further than getting MSD and Duke (gas)in play. Get the electric lines buried and eliminate the ugliness which detracts from nice ornate house facades. It's time that beautification needs to take a precedent and housing as a whole. If this happens all the other planning issues will fall into place.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck