*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Monday, June 19, 2006

Ted Strickland's not-so concealed weapon

When was the last time you heard a Democratic candidate for Ohio governor raking Republican state legislators over the coals for being soft on gun rights?

The answer is, you haven't.

But Ted Strickland is not the typical Democrat. He comes from hard-nosed, hard-scrabble southeast Ohio, where gun-toting is a way of life, whether for hunting deer or just for some peace of mind when you live down at the end of a long farm lane in the middle of nowhere.

So Strickland touts his 2nd Amendment beliefs at every opportunity, much to the chagrin of the upscale urban Democrats who shudder at the thought of J. Kenneth Blackwell in the Ohio governor's office.

It was not so strange, then, that the Strickland campaign cut loose a press release Monday morning taking Ohio Senate Republicans to task for adjourning for summer recess before acting on House Bill 347, a piece of legislation that gun owners belive would strengthen the Ohio Concealed Carry law. One of the things it would do is eliminate the requirement that concealed carry permit-holders keep their weapons in plain sight while in their vehicles.

"As governor, I would support passage of this bill in its entirety and would sign H.B. 347 into law the moment it hit my desk,'' Strickland said in the press release.

The statement of support for H.B. 347 came just as Strickland was winding up a three-day, 19-stop "Turnaround Ohio'' bus tour.

The tour assiduously avoided all major urban centers with the exceptions of Dayton and Columbus, winding its way instead through small towns and rural areas like Waverly, Chillicothe, Wilmington, Troy, Sidney and Wapakoneta.

These are places full of conservative, Republican-leaning voters - the same kind Strickland has depended on in his southeast Ohio congressional campaigns - who might well appreciate a gubernatorial candidate eager to protect their 2nd Amendment rights.

They also happen to be the backbone of the Republican voter base in Ohio, the kind of voters Republican candidates for governor can't live without.


5 Comments:

at 1:16 PM, June 19, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is about time a Democrat stands up for our constitutional rights.

We all need to be gun toter's !

The government is now the terrorist !

___

 
at 3:19 PM, June 19, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good for Mr. Strickland. I am glad that my party has finally become intellectually consistent when it comes to constitutional rights. The 2nd Amendment is just as important as the rest of the Bill of Rights. For too long, the Republicans have dominated gun owner's issues. I'm glad that we are finally taking back responsibility for defending every constitutional right. Go Ted!

 
at 9:46 PM, June 19, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Another reason that I so very much believe in Ted Strickland...

To refresh everybody's memory, I am the Democrat who supports every hunter and private gun owner from here to Canada...

Jim Parker
Former Candidate for US Congress
Southern Ohio - 2nd District - 2005 & 2006

 
at 12:54 PM, June 22, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"So Strickland touts his 2nd Amendment beliefs at every opportunity, much to the chagrin of the upscale urban Democrats who shudder at the thought of J. Kenneth Blackwell in the Ohio governor's office."

This makes no sense. Strickland edging into Repugnican identity issues makes him even more of a threat to Whiteywell. So, this upscale urban Democrat applauds the move. Now, if he were to go too far and be a total gun nut that was against registration and safety laws, that would be a different story; what Ted is doing is undermining the wrong wing urban legend that libels that Dems are simply anti guns or anti civil liberties, which has never been the case.

 
at 6:39 PM, October 15, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, I'm an urban Democrat and a leftie too bood, strong Libertarian leanings as well. I'm all for Strickland speaking his mind on the carry permit issue. Heck, the other guy who came out, by his actions, on this issue was Hackett. He has a carry permit and he needs it.

There is also the fashion statement issue. If you're going to wear a gun it is really immodest to show it off. After all, just having it is enough and you don't want to cause undue concern by flashing your piece.

Good for Strickland. The gun issue is over. Sure, ban military weapon style guns...packing an Uzi is not cool. But this is a reasonable issue.

Strickland needs to do a tour of the cities. We're ready!!!

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck