*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

Boehner announces Iraq debate on House floor


New House Majority Leader John Boehner has been saying for weeks now that lawmakers should - and would - get the opportunity to debate the future of the Iraq war in public.

"I think having a forum where members can express their interests, their concerns, their hopes is a good thing for the House," Boehner told reporters a month ago.

Now, that debate has taken shape in the form of a resolution, which the House will consider this Thursday. So tune in to C-SPAN on Thursday for the action.

Or, wait until campaign season and you might just see some of the footage from this debate used in commercials.

Boehner insisted to reporters at his weekly news conference today the debate is NOT partisan, but here is how he described the resolution:

"The fundamental question in this debate is are we going to confront the threat of terrorism and defeat it, or will we relent and retreat and hope the problem goes away? ... There are clear differences between where Republicans and Democrats are on how best to confront the global war on terror, and I think the American people deserve to see that there are different sides to this question and they can make up their own minds."

Note that back in March, Boehner was asked how big a factor he thinks the Iraq war is going to be in the mid-term House races this November. Here is what he said:

"I think it is a big issue. When the country is at war there is a certain unsettling that occurs with people around the country, as you might expect, and with 135,000 men and women from America fighting over there. They are from every community in the country. And so this anxiety that is out in America over this issue is understandable but it does have impact upon peoples' view of a lot of different issues."

So the Iraq war is going to be a "big issue" in the elections and yet having a public debate on it for the purpose of debating it is NOT political?

Welcome to Washington.


6 Comments:

at 9:08 AM, June 14, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

A darkly humerous song about a US Marine who falls in love with an Iraqi girl. The girl lures her to her home for an ambush, but she is shot dead by her own father and brother, who then kill another sister, before being taken out by the Marine.

It's called Hadji girl

HILARIOUS!!

Chorus:

"Durka, durka, Mohammed, jihad,
Sherpa, sherpa...Bakara!"


ALL together now!

"Durka, durka, Mohammed, jihad,
Sherpa, sherpa...Bakara!"

 
at 9:46 AM, June 14, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Our very own Paul Hackett was on Bill O'Reily last night and he TORE Murtha a new one!!!

Hackett is furious at Murtha for smearing our Marines without even looking at the evidence closely. Hackett said he tried calling Murtha a few times to inform him of what really happened, but the Pennsylvania Democrat Murtha wouldn't return Hackett's calls.

Paul Hackett just keeps impressing me more and more with his appearances, he seems so corageous and upstanding.

No wonder the Democrats didn't run with him in Ohio and instead chose that black woman Sherrod Brown. I guess they have to pander.

 
at 11:08 AM, June 14, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh boy - I cannot wait for all the brilliant things to be said about Iraq. Maybe Schmidt happens can make another brilliant statement. What I would like see discussed at least some:
1)How many times in US history has our justification for a war turned out to be wrong. How many times have we had to alter the justification for a war after it has started?
2)Specifically what exactly does it mean that we stay until the job is done? ie - security by Iraqis is as good as the best military in the world is doing with current year results being approx. 4000 dead Iraqi civilians. If the Iraqi's can provide the security as good as we have been able to do is that good enough or do we expect the Iraqis to achieve a security level better than the US military (best forces on the planet??
3) Discuss polls and sentiment of the Iraqi people - do they still want US troops in their country?
4) Would Congress and the American public supported going to war with only the current justification - would Bush even has asked for authorization just to establish a democracy in the middle east and to get rid of an evil dictator. (We go to war as a last resort to defend and protect against real bonafide threats - not for possible threats; if just possible threats we got a lot more work to do after Iraq). If yes - was Iraq the best target. How about Syria and all their chemical weapons or Iran which is now being run by a nut case.
5) Why is the prevailing thought process that is the US pulled back Iraq would turn out much worse and be overrun by all the bad guys. Discuss that if the US pulled back perhaps the total carnage would decrease because no foreign country would be occupying Iraq.
Hope I get to read or hear the discussion that would cover at least some of the above points.

 
at 2:46 PM, June 14, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sherrod Brown is a man.
And he's white.

 
at 4:14 PM, June 14, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sherrod Borwn is a white man?

Geezle-P, that must be why you never see his face on television.

 
at 8:15 PM, June 14, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Sherrod Brown comment was kind of funny...nope, he doesn't have much of a public profile, does he?

Now about that war in Iraq thing -- How many people would have voted for George W if in 2000 he had campaigned on the idea that the US should intervene militarily in the Middle East conflict?

Because that's why we're there: to establish a permanent American garrison to serve as a buffer zone for the State of Israel. The Iraqis themselves, and whatever kind of government they manage to assemble, hardly matter at all.

And of course, war is a highly profitable enterprise for some -- so what was that expression? "Bring it On"

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck