*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Debate over debates rages on

The gubernatorial flap over who wants to debate, who offered to debate first, who wants to debate now, or when and where, continued today.

Let us know who you think is taking the high road based on press statements:

In their latest news release, Secretary of State Ken Blackwell's campaign says U.S. Rep. Ted Strickland’s campaign "has now reverted to gamesmanship in an attempt to back away from their public commitment to a series of summer and fall debates.''

“We don’t want to have a debate about the debates,” said Carlo LoParo, Blackwell's spokesman. “We want these two candidates to speak to the people of Ohio in an open, fair and free-wheeling discussion, beginning as soon as possible.”

In a news release earlier today, Strickland said he accepted debate offers from several groups and media outlets. However, LoParo said that when the Blackwell campaign contacted many of those media outlets and organizations, they said they had not yet sent out invitations for such a debate, nor received acceptance of their offer from the Strickland campaign.

“We are disappointed Congressman Strickland is playing games instead of conducting good faith negotiations to arrange these important debates for the summer and fall,” LoParo said. “We stand ready to make arrangements for these debates immediately. It seems Strickland has no interest.”

Monday, Blackwell proposed the following dates, cities and times for the upcoming two weeks:

-- Thursday, June 15, Youngstown, 9 a.m. – 10:30 a.m.
-- Monday, June 19, Cincinnati, 11:30 a.m. – 1 p.m.
-- Tuesday, June 20, Columbus, 11 a.m. – 12:30 p.m.
-- Wednesday, June 21, Columbus, 4 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.
-- Thursday, June 22, Columbus, 1 p.m. – 2 p.m.

Each week, Blackwell offered to issue a new list of proposed times and dates with the hope a few will accommodate Strickland’s schedule.

The Blackwell campaign also stands ready to meet with the Strickland campaign to coordinate other dates, times and locations, LoParo said.

Strickland's campaign, meanwhile, announced it is committed to multiple debates that have been proposed to both campaigns by independent organizations and media.

The Strickland campaign proposed four debates - one each month starting in July.

"We are committed to sitting down with the Blackwell campaign and discussing dates, times and formats for debates," said Strickland debate coordinator David Wilhelm. "However, the Blackwell campaign, at this time, has refused to sit down and have such discussions. Quite frankly, they seem more interested in trying to score political points than coming to a serious agreement."

Wilhelm noted that the most recent communication he received from the Blackwell campaign demanded a format that would not allow for questions from a panel or an audience - only speeches by the candidates.

"Speeches by both candidates in the same general vicinity are not the same as open debates moderated by a neutral party with questions from the media or the public," Wilhelm said. "I think Ohioans will see through this ruse and demand what they deserve: real debates with tough questions."

Strickland's campaign said it would participate in the following debates or forums proposed by independent organizations and media:

-- Children’s Hunger Alliance
-- Ohio Association of Broadcasters
-- League of Women Voters/Ohio Historical Society
-- Major media consortium, including the Cleveland Plain Dealer and the Columbus Dispatch and others. (A similar primary debate offer also included the Dayton Daily News, Public Radio and TV and the Ohio News Network).

If Blackwell and Strickland agree to agree, several Enquirer readers have asked if any groups are inviting Green Party candidate Bob Fitrakis or Libertarian Bill Peirce to any debates?


8 Comments:

at 10:11 PM, June 14, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why Strickland would ever debate buckwheat blackwell is beyond me ?

In independent polls Strickland leads uncle tom blackwell by 16 points !

It would appear no one cares what buckwheat taftwell has to say.

Strickland should require blackwell to submit his debate request on the same weight of paper that suppressed the voters of our great state.

He should also make blackwell personally hand deliver the proper weight paper, preset the proper national ID to insure the request is not fraudulent !

__

 
at 10:26 PM, June 14, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This whole thing sounds hauntingly familiar... In the fall of 2005, I challenged Jean Schmidt to a public debate to be held in Hamilton County. She ignored my challenge. At the time, I was the only person in the United States of America who was running against Jean Schmidt.

Then again, in January 2006, I challenged her to another debate. She again ignored my challenge. She was afraid that I would be more knowledgeable and better prepared to discuss the future of Ohio than she was capable of doing...

The politicians of America often think that they can hide from their record and ignore the voice of the people that they supposedly represent. They are wrong.

The difference between Ted Strickland and me is that he will eventually be successful with his challenge for a debate. He has an organization of qualified people. He has a political campaign fund. And he is currently winning the election to be the next Governor of Ohio.

There are politicians. And then there are real people. Ted Strickland is one of the finest, most honest and decent people that you will ever meet.

Ted's opponent is hiding from him. He is afraid to debate Ted Strickland in a public setting in a forum that is arranged by independent organizations. Ted Strickland's opponent cannot run on his record. He has nothing to offer the State of Ohio and that is why he is playing this political game of hide and seek.

Get on with what the people of Ohio need. People have problems and they need leadership to take our state in the right direction. I want to see a public debate between these two candidates. I want the entire state to have the opportunity to decide who they will vote for based upon the issues and the answers that the candidates are able to provide. Maybe I believe in something that one of these candidates is unable to offer. Maybe that's why the Secretary of State won't accept Congressman Strickland's legitimate challenge.

Ohio can do much better than what we have right now. The children and families of Ohio DESERVE better. Accept Ted Strickland's challenge.

Jim Parker
Foremer Candidate for US Congress
Southern Ohio - 2nd District - 2005 & 2006

 
at 10:47 PM, June 14, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry - comments on "Debates" inadvertantly posted at item below- "Dohoney".

 
at 1:09 PM, June 15, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

If Blackwell would play games with the election process (paper weight, voter registration rule changes) why wouldn't he be expected to play games with the less important debate negotiations?

If he thinks a man who's got a vested interest in the election outcome can be trusted to oversee the vote counting then, he just doesn't take the election process seriously.

 
at 8:04 PM, June 15, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Off topic question to Enquirer blog reporters:

Do you plan to post any items about the jail sales tax, which was clearly this week's biggest local story? Lack of coverage here on the blog seems conspicuous by its absence.

 
at 10:30 PM, June 15, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

(Sorry for another off-topic post. It's unlikely the Enquirer will report this story, so a comment posted here will have to suffice for now.)

Weekly Medical Newsletter Calls Enquirer To Task

 
at 5:20 PM, June 16, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why do you insist on ignoring the other candidates in the race. Libertarians and Greens have candidates that represent us and you don't get to pick our candidates for us, though you always try.

 
at 9:46 AM, July 05, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Debates should not be held UNLESS all qualified/certified candidates are allowed to participate. It is an outrage for these orgnizations to allow only the 2 major parties when independents required 5 X the number of signatures to qualify for the ballot.

Isn't democracy about having our voices heard?

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck