*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Monday, June 25, 2007

Monzel Ups The Ante Against Queensgate

Chris Monzel's pushing a new motion against the proposed Queensgate barge terminal along the river. Remember, he picked up the ball on this one after John Cranley stepped away from leading the issue because he works for a developer whose East Price Hill project overlooks the Hilltop Concrete Co. site where Queensgate wants to do its river-to-rail operation.

First, Monzel asked that a previous resolution against the Queensgate project be heard by council's economic development committee. But Chris Bortz, chairman of that committee, said that resolution was moot because it was specifically tied to a proposed Queensgate lease that council already rejected. He said there was nothing to talk about or act on because nothing's pending before council.

So Monzel jumped in with a motion that any lease proposed in the future with Queensgate be rejected and the space be kept as greenspace and made into a place for recreation.

His accompanying statement: "Cincinnati's western neighborhoods are in the early stages of a renaissance that will reshape and reposition these communities as never before. In an unprecedented turn of events, all community councils representing the Price Hill area are in agreement that this land should not be reverted to industrial use. It is important that we as (a) body take a firm stand and support the neighborhoods in their desire to see this site utilized in a way that maximizes the recreational benefit for all of Cincinnati's residents."





.


13 Comments:

at 9:39 AM, June 26, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

pander, pander, pander

 
at 9:49 AM, June 26, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

now, how hard was it to post a real story, Jane, instead of some petty bs about what the mayor ate for breakfast or whether some council member wears boxers or briefs?

 
at 10:02 AM, June 26, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

'...recreational benefit for all of Cincinnati's residents'? Give me a break. Maybe more west siders should start patronizing the EXISTING central riverfront parks that are truly for EVERYONE's use.

The notion of carving out the last remaining true river/rail/road multi-modal industrial site, already surrounded by other industrial sites, to be used for green space is positively absurd. Who wants to go use that? It's not as if the industrial areas just sprung up after people bought residences in the area...

I'm not sure where Mr. Monzel (or Mr. Cranley, for that matter) thinks that the City is going to raise the revenue to maintain another park. Instead, they've decided to turn away $4M/year in revenue. Do the math... how many decent jobs does the City have to create (each paying 2.1% in payroll tax) to make up for that revenue?

Keep this industrial site for industrial use and keep it revenue producing... Call it an "industrial park", if that helps.

 
at 10:28 AM, June 26, 2007 Blogger Radarman said...

It should be apparent to anyone looking at Price Hill and Lower Price Hill that those communities need job openings way more than they need park space. To let this important project be denied in order to improve the view from The Queen's Tower and the condominiums on Mt Hope would be ridiculous.

 
at 10:52 AM, June 26, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Once again, Ice Cream Boy, Bradford his trusty sidekick, and Christa his Powder Puff Girl, have shown just how utterly inept and clueless they are.

 
at 11:37 AM, June 26, 2007 Blogger usefullidiot said...

Radarman,
Maybe they don't want any private sector eysores to compete with MSD.

LOL

 
at 1:13 PM, June 26, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good for you Chris Monzel!

 
at 3:55 PM, June 26, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The city is fortunate to have a Councilman like Chris Monzel who works so hard on quality of life issues for the neighborhoods. He's worked to take away liquor licenses for crime-infested bars, restrict sex offenders, deal with drug-dealing ice cream trucks, promote greenspace, move billboards away from residences, among other things.

While other Councilmen waste time on meaningless resolutions about federal issues (Crowley) or endlessly bicker without getting anything done (Ghiz and Berding), Monzel and his staff are busy working to improve the lives of city residents.

 
at 5:29 PM, June 26, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Isn't it ironic that only Council's west side residents are standing up the west side?

 
at 9:41 PM, June 26, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I say keep the industry on the west side. Its not as though they would smell the smoke, fumes, and rotting stench associated with such noxious uses, since they live in absolute squalor now. You know, I think this is cutting off your nose to spite your own face - well stated about the need for jobs and employment verses ANOTHER park. Besides, we all know that people from the west side of town are so stupid that they will actually support such a bird-brained notion. Here is a thought, if you don't like the view from Price Hill, move to Mount Adams, or Mt. Lookout, or anywhere else on the East side of I75 morons!

 
at 10:55 PM, June 26, 2007 Blogger Kevin LeMaster said...

The city has precious little available industrial space for new firms. So they build farther out and Cincinnati loses their revenue to a neighboring city/township.

I understand the feelings of neighboring people preferring greenspace to industry. But the western riverfront has historically been industrial. Greenspace (between a viaduct and railroad lines) won't be available for public use and will be a drain on the budget of the city. (It costs money to maintain and provides no revenue.)

 
at 4:02 AM, July 24, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok let's break this down...

Queensgate could generate hundreds of millions in revenue for the Cincinnati region. The region is already very industrial, and Cincinnati desperately needs jobs.

vs.

A handfull of $300K-$400K condos which will serve to warehouse retired or soon to be retired baby boomers. And whiny, spoiled condo owner baby boomers at that... The same people who drain city resources by whining that they want everything to be perfect as if Cincinnati should be like Blue Ash. And hey we already have huge parks that nobody uses... Let's build more parks! I'd like to see another park full of weeds and vegrants shooting up heroin.

Now what lesson did we learn from Forest Fair decades ago...
BUILD IT WEST AND THEY WON'T COME.

 
at 10:35 PM, September 04, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

LETS REMEMBER THAT CHRIS MONZEL WAS THE SOLE COUNCIL MEMBER WHO WAS AGAINST EXPANDING THE HUMAN RIGHTS ORDINANCE TO PROTECT GAY TAX PAYING CITIZENS FROM BEING FIRED FROM THEIR JOBS JUST FOR BEING GAY

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck