*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Tuesday, May 06, 2008

A picture is worth....$13


Kathleen Akin of Wyoming was featured in The Enquirer April 24 for her decision to be a single mother. But it was her dog that got the attention of the Hamilton County Auditor's Office.


After a photo showed Akin, 45, and her children walking with Sophie, the family's King Charles spaniel, Akin got a letter from the Auditor's Office.


"We saw a picture from Thursday's Cincinnati Enquirer of you in the 'Single Women Who Choose Motherhood" article,'" stated the letter. "When we checked our dog registration database, we didn't find any references you had licensed your dog Sophie."
Akin's response: "I was like, 'Oh my God.' There are so many people out there not paying their child support and they're wasting their time on a $13 dog registration."

Jessica Brown has the story here


60 Comments:

at 10:38 AM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, lady, the County Auditor's office does not handle child-support payments. They do dog licenses, though.

Besides, we know about the child-support enforcement actions because the government takes action against them. All those people you read and hear about owing child support are known to us becausee a government agency somewhere has gone to court on behalf of the parent and received a judgement.

Sheesh. How ignorant can we get? I wonder what she thinks of Marc Dann. Does she buy his "other people have affairs" defense? Or does she think he should go because she doesn't approve of his behavior or demeanor. Either way, she is a pathetic hypocrite and probably votes for Democrats.

 
at 10:41 AM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Auditor's office has nothing to do with "people not paying their child support". If they did it would probably be done better.

 
at 11:45 AM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.

Seems the auditors office has time to harass citizens for a dog license, but doesn't have the time to recoup (CAUV) property tax breaks for, so called, 'farmers' in the plush "culture of corruption' valley of Indian Hill, where the land should be valued at 100,000 per. green acre, yet some are not ?

Seems dusty can take the time to harass a citizen, but, fails to respond to records requests and explanations why the Camargo County Club is receiving 100's of thousands of dollars in reduced property valuations.

Check out the sweet deal dusty's cronies get:

CAMARGO CLUB THE 529-0091-0033-00 8605 SHAWNEE RUN RD SHAWNEE RUN RD 33.99 ACS R2-

CAMARGO CLUB THE 529-0091-0046-00 8605 SHAWNEE RUN RD SHAWNEE RUN RD AC IRR R2-

CAMARGO CLUB THE 529-0100-0004-00 8605 SHAWNEE RUN RD REAR SHAWNEE RUN RD AC IR R2-

CAMARGO CLUB THE 529-0100-0009-00 8605 SHAWNEE RUN RD R2-T5-S36 SW AC IRR

CAMARGO CLUB THE 529-0100-0025-00 8755 CAMARGO CLUB DR CAMARGO CLUB DR 19.4028 AC

CAMARGO CLUB THE 529-0100-0028-00 8605 SHAWNEE RUN RD SS SHAWNEE RUN RD 14.3909 AC

CAMARGO CLUB THE 529-0100-0029-00 8605 SHAWNEE RUN RD CAMARGO CLUB DR 15.

Seems the auditors, wRong wingnut whacko, crony employees can use the county dime to defend their wicked ways by 'blogging all day when they should be providing the taxpayers with a return on their investment !

Hey 'fishwRap' since the auditors office is willing to travel down the ole dusty roads to investigate your fine work, why don't you do a little investigative reporting, of your own, regarding the auditors (CAUV) documentation, recoupment efforts, verification efforts, etc. ?

dusty could end up in the same seat as that crony lover AG (Dann) with his head between his legs to kiss his *** good bye !

Time for the DINO to early retire ?

PATHETIC 'family values' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE, for a real, DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 12:05 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, Pathetic!

Wondered where you'd go when the other blog went away. Glad you found this one. I missed you.

It's probably an indication of the veracity of your ongoing CAUV pogrom that no reputable media has bit.

Then again, if they did they might find your friend, Vic "The Trick" who just started playing the CAUV game this year, helping herself to a tax break of her very own.

 
at 12:16 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Since when is informing someone that they are breaking the law considered "harassment"?

 
at 12:35 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm with you on your frustration Kathleen. This story is another perfect example of the reason so many people consider themselves loyal Americans who are damn tired of the American government. Whoever made the decision to pursue this situation based upon a name and published photograph has way to much time on your hands. And we, the citizens paying your salary,are putting you and your team on notice, should senseless greedy decisions like this continue your employment should be terminated. Failure to curtail this type of activity could result in the public at large fearing governemnt intrusion into every corner of their lives. It's the type of persons involved with this decision that we MUST eliminate from our government payrolls.

 
at 12:42 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

~

Hon. Kathleen Akin pays $10,280 per. year property tax for her .77 acre single-mom home while former disgraced congressional candidate 'hack Black' pays zero on his .28 acres and zero on his .95 acres and only $7,948 per. year for 10.27 acres ?

All while the private CAMARGO CLUB DRIVE ASSN pays only $24.20 a year for 11.72 acres ?

Seems the single-mom doesn't belong to the extreme right club ?

PATHETIC 'family values' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE, for a real, DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 1:01 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

529-0091-0033-00

that's a pretty sweet tax rate for a large amount of prime real estate.

check it all out at http://www.hamiltoncountyauditor.org/realestate/rover30.asp

 
at 1:08 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Last time I checked, and this wasn't long ago, the auditor was a democrat! Maybe the bold faced typer from the Camargo Club knows something the rest of us don't - and it's nothing to do with his wacko "family values" or "having enough with this and that..."

Had enough taxes? Had enough of Dann? Had enough of city clowncil? Had enough of crazy libs? Vote Republican, vote independent!

 
at 1:26 PM, May 06, 2008 Blogger Hamilton County Voter said...

I purchase a license for my dog every year - so should everyone else.
Good for Hamilton County and for Dusty!

 
at 1:39 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Corey said...

I love how that guy post on every blog, in that font and just rambles, let's me know what post to skip.

YEah, her dog not having a license has nothing to do with people not paying child support.
What's that teaching her kids? As long as you think someone is doing something worse, you can do what you want?
Grow up lady.

 
at 2:07 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dusty's office is so out-moded, he needs to worry about modernizing his operations and making it more efficient rather than nickel and diming people to death.

 
at 2:08 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am just curious as to who in the Auditor's office she must have ticked off in order for them to conduct an investigation of her and their dog.

Is this standard operating procedure for employees in the Auditor's office to scour local newspapers looking for pictures of families with their pets, investigate them, track them down and harass them?

Big Brother is always watching.

 
at 3:22 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

'Anonymous said...Since when is informing someone that they are breaking the law considered "harassment"? 12:16 PM, May 06, 2008"

When the 'FREE PRESS' is used for LAW ENFORCEMENT !

We can't wait until that 'China Syndrome' city-clowncil puts up that red-light camera !

Once you get used to the press and street monitoring, you won't mind a wide-span, pin-hole camera in your mandated Chinese digital tuner converter to monitor your living room, bed room, den or office ?

After all: It's for interactive live video and you might have an unregistered gun or dogie !

Hello, Tibet !

How's that 'RELIGIOUS FREEDOM' going ?

We heard you were trying to VOTE ?

Second note:

Why hasn't the auditors office explained that fax ?

PATHETIC 'family values' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE, for a real, DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 3:39 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Next thing you know, the people who run reds light in their cars are going to complain when they get caught in the act.

 
at 4:05 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

If Dusty was really doing favors for his "cronys" he wouldn't be putting all the values on the Internet.

The CAUV (agricultural) tax breaks are REQUIRED by state law - for people in Indian Hill and anywhere else.

Anyone believing any property is improperly valued has the right to file a complaint for a hearing before the Board of Revision.

It doesn't cost anything to file. If there was any validity to the repeated charges of misvaluation by the perpetual funny type face blogger that is what she would do.

But she hasn't. I know if I had the kind of "goods" on any public office as she pretends to have on Dusty, I'd be doing more about it than writing newspaper blogs.

 
at 5:08 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rhodes has one of the best run offices in the county. He's constantly improving his website.

Read the article - he said he disagrees with dog licensing. But it's his job to do it. If you don't like the law call your State Representative. Don't blame Rhodes for following the law.

What is he supposed to do when some woman is cavorting across the pages of the newspaper with unlicensed dogs? Look the other way? Pretend he didn't see it?

Get real.

 
at 5:34 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

~
"Anonymous said...Dusty was really doing favors for his "cronys"...putting all the...tax breaks...for people in Indian Hill...improperly valued...perpetual..."goods" on...public office...to have on Dusty...4:05 PM, May 06, 2008"

Another wRong wingnut whacko crony employee invoking political protectionism while blogging on the COUNTY DIME !

The fact that the 'schmidt-head' plagiarizers are foot-tapping support for the auditors office is a clear sign that the 'culture of corruption' is alive and well !

Where is that signed exemption from the State Tax Commissioner you talk so much about ?

Why don't you produce it ?

Didn't think sooooooooo !

We will pass enforcement off to da da da whine since she seeks to be a county judge and currently sits as a minority on the county commission !

She'll probably love that scoop on two of the members of the Board of Revision ?

It is all about timing, sweetie !

Think Pa pa pa Pat will collaborate with the opposition ?

That would make our day: Hey judge Davis !

Tell dusty to hurry up and explain that fax and complete that document request would you please: Drake Tracy !

No telling what else we'll discover ?

Wonder if anyone has asked for the last three years recoupment and segregated them by location ?

Think there would be any recoupment in Indian Hill ?

Wow, things are getting:

PATHETIC 'HypocRite' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE, for a real, Democrat 2008 !

 
at 6:17 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
Anonymous said...Maybe the bold faced typer from the Camargo Club knows something the rest of us don't...1:08 PM, May 06, 2008"

MAYBE ?


 
at 7:01 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
"Anyone believing any property is improperly valued has the right to file a complaint for a hearing before the Board of Revision."

Once again the 'schmidt-head' crony is 'CLUELESS' about 'Who MAY FILE' !


 
at 7:07 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tell it like it is...way to go... Mr.Butch Boldface!

 
at 7:38 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

That whining woman from Wyoming needs to wake up & get a reality check. Child support payments are a very serious matter & are handled in an efficient manner. That doesn't absolve her from paying for a license for that dog. Cridy! She lives in Wyoming, has 2 kids, & a pedigree dog. I guess with costs being what they are, $13 would put her over budget & then her keeping up appearances facade would become a bit faded in Wyoming.

Oh say, doesn't the dog on a leash law apply in Wyoming??? Looks to me that this mutt of champion blood specimen is bounding along without a leash.

Nice examples of abiding by the law she's establishing for her 2 kids. Real nice job. No dog tags, no leash. Way to go, whiny woman from Wyoming!

Thanks for applying the statutes fairly, Dusty! You're the man!!

 
at 9:29 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

How do you "blog on the county dime" at 4:05pm when the county offices close at 4:00pm?

C'mon Carrie, Carrie quite contrary. How does your garden grow? Maybe with lots of CAUV exemptions all in a row...

That Dusty has always had a special place in his heart for Indian Hill
just like most west side Democrats.
They are well known as big Indian Hill boosters. That's why Vic "the Trick" got her CAUV tax break this year.

Oh, wait a minute. Those west side Democrats are DINOs because most of them are Catholics and they don't believe in killing unborn babies.

Keep on bloggin' ... nobody's buying any of it ... It is pretty amusing, though. And what else do you have to do?

 
at 9:55 PM, May 06, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jeezis Butch...take a pill...take a lot of pills...
So what does Dusty get out a deal with Camargo CC? Surely not a membership.He's a West Sider fercrissakes,Butch!
Golly,if they can hunt down this woman her little dog,too,I guess all the Pit Bulls and Rotweillers in The OTR and University Heights are already licensed,huh?

 
at 5:55 AM, May 07, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The real shame is that this was even a story. Who called the media? If Dusty, then shame on him for embarrassing a taxpayer in public. If Akins, then pay your license fee like everybody. You have to be from another plant not to know that dogs must be registered.

 
at 6:15 AM, May 07, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey bold typer guy.

You wrote that Camargo Club Dr. Assn. pays next to nothing for an 11 acre tract. You are right. BECAUSE IT IS A PRIVATE ROAD, wide enough only to drive cars upon. Therefore, it has no market value as it can't be used as anything other than a private road for the houses that live on Camargo Club Drive.

Are you really that dense?

 
at 9:46 AM, May 07, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

~
" Anonymous said...You wrote that Camargo Club Dr. Assn. pays next to nothing for an 11 acre tract. You are right. BECAUSE IT IS A PRIVATE ROAD, wide enough only to drive cars upon. Therefore, it has no market value as it can't be used as anything other than a private road for the houses that live on Camargo Club Drive. Are you really that dense? 6:15 AM, May 07, 2008"

Oh, what a wRong wingnut whacko !

Would that not make it a 'DRIVEWAY' ?

So, if that's your bizarre justification where does every homeowner sign up ?

The current use is zoned 500 Residential vacant land, no difference than any other lot, PERIOD !

A driveway does not consume acres !

Highest use value unless qualified for exemption !

So, come on 'sweet jeans' let's see you plagiarize some more 'culture of corruption', elephant dung tails !

PATHETIC 'family values' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE, for a real, DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 10:33 AM, May 07, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The idea proposed by some in this blog that a public official can not use information in the public realm in performance of his duties is beyond bizarre.

Are they suggesting that no official should pay any attention to anything in their news media?

 
at 12:50 PM, May 07, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Seems the bold faced typing guy is wrong again.

Click on the map related to the Camargo Assn land and be enlightened. A private road it is.

It is sad that one can be so wrong.

How can a private road take so much land? Easy. It's a long road. Maybe bold faced typist guy should check it out.

 
at 4:46 PM, May 07, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

bold face typer is female!

 
at 5:18 PM, May 07, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
"Click on the map related to the Camargo Assn land and be enlightened. A private road it is."

A private road leading to a residence is called a "DRIVEWAY" !

A private road for trail horses is called recreational use !


 
at 7:37 PM, May 07, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wrong, you idiot.

 
at 8:28 PM, May 07, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kathleen Akin = one whiny rhymes with rich

 
at 9:01 PM, May 07, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
Anonymous said...How do you "blog on the county dime" at 4:05pm when the county offices close at 4:00pm?"...9:29 PM, May 06, 2008"

Well then, the county crony either left work EARLY or is using tax-payer property to blog ?

"And what else do you have to do?...9:29 PM, May 06, 2008"

Maybe make deposits to the family trust-fund with that little government contract business ?

The family will be hiring for 1 1/2 Weeks only, paying $22.50 per. hr. Oct. 27 - Nov. 4, 2008.

Must be able to continually lift 50 lbs. You will be unloading and transferring by tossing locked sacks.

We are expecting an influx of wRong wingnut whacko misleading campaign literature ?

Meet at 6:30 A.M. Oct. 27 at the corner of Bridge Overpass and River Bottom !

The position is non-union but you will be taking a major load off the United Postal Workers Union !


 
at 10:08 PM, May 07, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

No, it is a private road. I drive on it.

The road is called "Camargo Club Drive".

It starts at Drake Road near Graves and winds through the area.

It is 2 lanes wide, and the parcel in question is part of the road.

It is not owned by Camargo Club, but rather by the Homeowners Association.

I estimate it, along with its associated right of way, to be about twenty five feet wide.

 
at 11:18 AM, May 08, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
"Anonymous said...No, it is a private road. I drive on it.
The road is called "Camargo Club Drive". It starts at Drake Road near Graves and winds through the area. It is 2 lanes wide, and the parcel in question is part of the road. It is not owned by Camargo Club, but rather by the Homeowners Association. I estimate it, along with its associated right of way, to be about twenty five feet wide.
10:08 PM, May 07, 2008"

It is private land with a driveway to private homes. If one person owned the property the other home owners would have an easement !

We are aware it is the homeowners associations property and never represented that it had anything to do with Camargo Club and golf course !

There are 128 properties getting reduced valuations in I.H. including some property management companies, banks and 'Linders' !

Cite the statute of the O.R.C. that justifies the association's property valuation.

If the property is 20 ft. wide, how long is it ?


 
at 12:38 PM, May 08, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

As any real-estate person can tell you, property has value based upon its use, and potential use.

A narrow strip of land that has no higher and better use than as a roadway has a very low level of desirability. It would be unbuildable, as it could never meet property setbacks.

The amount of land has nothing to do with value in a case like this. The usability of the land is what matters.

 
at 3:24 PM, May 08, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
"Anonymous said...As any real-estate person can tell you, property has value based upon its use, and potential use. A narrow strip of land that has no higher and better use than as a roadway has a very low level of desirability. It would be unbuildable, as it could never meet property setbacks. The amount of land has nothing to do with value in a case like this. The usability of the land is what matters. 12:38 PM, May 08, 2008"

Highest use value, PERIOD !

We wonder how many pieces of property in OTR pay only $ 25.00 in property tax because they are narrow lots ?

Cite the statute !

PATHETIC 'family values' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE, for a real, DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 5:21 PM, May 08, 2008 Anonymous Kent Evans said...

The idea behind the need for a dog license is only for revenue. Why give credit to "Dusty" for pretending he's corralling a need for the county to keep track of dogs? As to his "hip" staff...maybe they could treat people in a dignified manner instead of the smug way I've witnessed.

 
at 5:50 PM, May 08, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Dusty" has asked for no credit. State law requires that dogs be licensed for whatever reason and the Auditor's office is charged with doing that.

What could be more "dignified" than
advising someone they are required to license their dogs? "Dusty" didn't make an issue of it, the lady did when she called the newspaper to complain about getting the letter.

 
at 6:32 PM, May 08, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Property setbacks are set by local municipal ordinance. There is no ORC for such things. Indian Hill requires at least 100 feet (dependent upon the part of Indian Hill).

I also believe that a deed restriction requires that the land be used as access. Therefore, it is nearly valueless. Since it cannot be used for anything but access to a few residences, it is worth nothing.

You are barking up the wrong tree, and are clearly wrong.

The highest and best use is what it currently is.

Not to mention that the adjacent property owners have easements to travel across it, therefore nothing could ever be built upon it.

 
at 9:56 PM, May 08, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
Anonymous said...Property setbacks are set by local municipal ordinance. There is no ORC for such things. Indian Hill requires at least 100 feet (dependent upon the part of Indian Hill). 6:32 PM, May 08, 2008"

A city, township, village can't devalue property by muni-code.

If the property is devalued there must be an O.R.C. that permits it, PERIOD !

An easement has nothing to do with valuation. In every location the city, township, village has an easement on everyones property rights. That doesn't permit each homeowner to have that section devalued !

There is a utility pole in someones yard and it can't be used for any other purpose. Do they get a devaluation ?

Cite the statute !

PATHETIC 'family values' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE, for a real, DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 10:21 PM, May 08, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.

By the way the 'driveway' leads to their other 'property' !

Take a look at this 'property'. Click on the map. It has an address of Beechtree in Springfield Township. It is only 20 feet wide at the street. You will see a private road leading to it. The private road is called Commonwealth. The property from the edge of the road to the street(Beechtree) is unusable for any other purpose. The land is valued at $17,100 !

Guess what: They don't get the same benefits as the Camargo Club Assc. ?

Cite the statute !


 
at 11:12 AM, May 09, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, Pathetic:

No need to "cite" any "statute".

If you believe a property is mis-valued you have the right to file a complaint with the Board of
Revision.

Or you can keep posting silly blogs and making foolish charges.

Your choice.

 
at 11:23 AM, May 09, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...


Maybe, the private road is an improvement and the property should be valued higher than the land alone for which is $100,000 per acre ?

Yet land and improvements are only valued at $1,000 ?

We shall provide you with the statute that supports that theory of land improvement, (notice the terms private road in the statute) now, you provide the statute that discredits the O.R.C.:

Chapter 5703-3 Property Tax
5703-3-01 Property excepting oil, gas and water production plants.


(A) For the purpose of classifying property for taxation, items of property devoted primarily to the general use of the land or buildings thereon are to be considered as real property and all other items of property including their foundations and all things accessory thereto which are devoted primarily to the business conducted on the premises are to be considered as personal property.

(B) The following items are hereby classified as real property for the purpose of taxation. This list is not all-inclusive and items similar to those herein classified are to be considered as real property if they meet the test as set forth in the preceding paragraph.

(1) Land and improvements to land, including retaining walls, piling, and mats for the general improvement of the site, private roads, walks, paving, areaways, culverts, bridges, viaducts, subways and tunnels, fencing, artificial lakes, reservoirs, spray ponds, dykes, dams, ditches and canals, drainage, storm and sanitary sewers, water lines for drinking, sanitary and fire protection purposes.

Provide the exemption statute, CLUELESS !

PATHETIC 'family values' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 12:25 PM, May 09, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
"If you believe a property is mis-valued you have the right to file a complaint with the Board of
Revision. 11:12 AM, May 09, 2008"

Typical clueless, wRong wingnut whacko, spewing the elephant dung propaganda !

Appears the 'culture of corruption' really can't read the laws or they would have visited the previous post that discredits them !

Now, for the slow learners:

Scroll down to the paragraph heading titled:

'Who may File' !

PATHETIC 'HypocRites' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 2:33 PM, May 09, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

HAD ENOUGH DEPRAVED DANN DEMOCRATS?

VOTE REPUBLICAN IN 2008!

 
at 5:02 PM, May 09, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here 'tis. What do the words "any person owning taxable real property in county" mean to you"? If you don't "own property" maybe you can find someone who does to help you correct these great injustices.


WHO MAY FILE: Any person owning taxable real property in the county, the board of county commissioners, the county
prosecutor, the county treasurer, the board of township trustees of any township with territory in the county, the board of
education of any school district with territory in the county, or the mayor or legislative authority of any municipal corporation
with territory in the county may file a valuation complaint.

 
at 6:30 PM, May 09, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
"Anonymous said...Here 'tis. What do the words "any person owning taxable real property in county" mean to you"? If you don't "own property" maybe you can find someone who does to help you correct these great injustices."

You need to scroll down further and review the Ohio Supreme Court decisions !

There have been several, which have ruled against anyone other than the owner of the property !

The theory is overzealous neighbors !

Check the Tax Appeal Board's cases !

We didn't expect you to know that though, Clueless !

PATHETIC 'family values' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 7:04 PM, May 09, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.

Maybe this can help: 'CLUELESS' !

Not to worry, Pa pa pa Pat wants to be a judge real bad and it may be a little more difficult against an incumbent ?

He'll be grabbing for headlines !

PATHETIC 'HypocRites' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 11:08 PM, May 10, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey, Pathetic:

The few cases you found with various procedural issues simply don't overturn the basic protection "any person owning taxable property in the county" can seek from the Board of Revision with a valuation complaint.

If you're afraid to file complaints yourself, you can provide your information to the school district affected. The school boards have real attorneys on retainer, are always filing Board of Revision complaints any welcome any chance to increase their tax take.

They would love to see you coming
- assuming there is any validity to your charges.

Your failure to do anything about the many "injustices" of which you write - even to the point of making weak excuses why you can't - says so much more than your continuing posts.

 
at 11:21 PM, May 10, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
"Anonymous said...Maybe the bold faced typer from the Camargo Club knows something the rest of us don't...1:08 PM, May 06, 2008"

Never one to say we told you sooooo !

MAYBE ?

 
at 11:23 AM, May 11, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
"Your failure to do anything about the many "injustices" of which you write - even to the point of making weak excuses why you can't - says so much more than your continuing posts. 11:08 PM, May 10, 2008"

Hey 'clueless', flip-flopping, county crony employee, you just can't learn to read !

First it was one thing, now it is another !

When that is the case, there is no wonder the incompetent auditor and staff will engage in political protectionism, PERIOD !

We wonder if there are red-light cameras in the county offices as the clean-up is in process ?

It is all about timing, sweetie !

The ducks will be on the dusty roads before your boat floats !

Perhaps, there are several attorney, government officials, following ?

There is no telling what will be discovered ?

We continue to 'rope the dope' and entrap her ignorance !

Now, county employee, when could your school board file ?

What dates ?

You totally lack credibility, PERIOD !

But hey, Thanks for being a FOLLOWER !

PATHETIC 'family values' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 11:47 AM, May 11, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This sounds like Coast, We demand and Rothenburg are chasing scandal ?

 
at 12:34 PM, May 11, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pathetic knows nothing beyond how to make ridiculous, unfounded charges over and over and over...

But that's all she knows. Poor thing is too scared to do anything more.
Maybe she should go back to suing the Bengals.

And I'm happy to say I told you so..

 
at 4:24 PM, May 11, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
"The few cases you found with various procedural issues simply don't overturn the basic protection"

This sounds like a lie-yer's rhetoric !

Once again it is XXX judge Tryingtofoolyou !

And I'm happy to say I told you so..12:34 PM, May 11, 2008"

Once again it is XXX judge Tryintofoolyou !

There is no telling what we will discover, but, we do know there will be pathetic: FOLLOWERS !

PATHETIC 'family values' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 8:25 AM, May 12, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Could this mean that Pathetic is finally going to do something beyond posting hilarious blogs?

We know she's afraid to file value complaints with the Board of Revision. (Others can and do - but the law says she can't). And I guess we can assume even the school boards don't take her seriously.

Let's see if some attorneys and government officials will bite. I know the Auditor's office loves visitors and Dusty loves publicity.

I can hardly wait.

 
at 1:15 PM, May 12, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
Anonymous said...I can hardly wait. 8:25 AM, May 12, 2008"

Then hurry up, wRong wingnut whacko county crony, and complete the public records requests, email requests, phone call requests, statistical audits, sample random letter audits, random audit file, current woodland agency list of properties under state land management, explanation why Camargo is not on the the woodland management list, explanation why CAUV requires commercial timber and Camargo is listed as non-commercial timber and why is there no adjoining farming land application that qualifies under CAUV, explanation why there was an 11 page fax from the Camargo file after a request for documents yet before the documents were produced, explanation of why you do not have an agency list of those properties under any federal conservation program, is there none in Hamilton County, etc. ?

We hear they are a matter of discovery ?

We have been promised access ?

Will will expose the observation if we happen to be provided with the information !

No guarantee: we didn't make the request. We hear it's in the works ?

Hey, thanks for being a: FOLLOWER !

How's that for publicity, XXX judge Tryintofoolyou !

Have to run, cover your tracks, feet getting hot ?

Perhaps another fax will conceal incompetence ?

PATHETIC 'family values' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE, for a real, DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
at 1:59 PM, May 12, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The only wrong, wingnut whacko is you, darling.

Once again, barking up the wrong tree, but what's new?

Who is "we"? More shadowy rogues skulking around trying to create an issue where none exists.

Your blue smoke and mirrors legal opinions never fail to amuse.

 
at 6:03 PM, May 12, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.
"Anonymous said...The only wrong, wingnut whacko is you, darling.Once again, barking up the wrong tree, but what's new? Who is "we"? More shadowy rogues skulking around trying to create an issue where none exists. Your blue smoke and mirrors legal opinions never fail to amuse. 1:59 PM, May 12, 2008"

Well, it would seem 'lie-yering, farmer black' has lost a 'field hoe' and it is heid-ing in OH-1 !

HAY, if they spent more time getting volunteers and less time spreading the trail-horse manure, they may be able to kick a little elephant dung off them, there, riding boots ?

PATHETIC 'family values' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE, for a real, DEMOCRAT 2008 !

 
Post a Comment*

Links to this post:

Create a Link

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck