*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Monday, December 10, 2007

Oh, What Fun At Finance Committee

Leslie Ghiz was mad. Council allotted $2.7 million last year for the police department to spend specifically on high-visibility overtime (walking patrols, mostly, council thought). And the department didn't spend it all.

She started the conversation in Monday's finance committee talking about the committee meeting from the week before, when she learned the money hadn't been spent. "To say that I was upset is putting it mildly."

Then she went farther, saying had she known when she took part in City Manager Milton Dohoney's evaluation this summer that the money wasn't being spent, she "wouldn't have been so kind." And later: "The number 1 thing we wanted done wasn't done."


Dohoney, as usual, stayed calm. Police Chief Tom Streicher? Not so much.


The chief told Ghiz that for every complaint she said she got from residents in Avondale, North Avondale, Westwood, Price Hill and other neighborhoods, he had 10 compliments, or maybe even 100.


"Am I saying to you I won't do it? No, I'm not," Streicher said. "There is no intention to defy you."


One City Hall aide did the math and pointed out that with $2.7 million, every one of Cincinnati's approximately 1,100 officers would have had had to work more than $2,400 worth of overtime. That would be on top of the overtime for court that's mandatory and on top of any other overtime they have to do when they get involved in an incident that extends beyond quitting time. And on top of any extra hours they spend working uniformed details for private-paying customers, like Kroger.


Dohoney let the exchange go on about 10 minutes before jumping in with: "The administration needs to respond differently to your directive. And we will do that."


So now, how much money should council give the department for 2008, given that Streicher said he didn't need this much? All nine council members were re-elected last month after campaigns that focused much attention on how much they'd tried to fight crime.


31 Comments:

at 10:40 AM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Council needs to grow a pair and stand up to Streicher, who has been defying civilian authority for years.

Streicher is a hothead who is a bad dept. manager, and really should be replaced.

 
at 11:16 AM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tom Striecher is the best police chief this City has ever had. Let's crucify him for saving money. He does not suffer fools (Ghiz) gladly.

 
at 11:17 AM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kudos to Leslie Ghiz for standing up to the chief. Ever since she kicked the inept Scott Gehring to the curb, she has found her real voice again.

 
at 11:54 AM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Leslie. You did not know of leftover police money and now you are angry. You react TOO much and vote TOO much on things you do not know. Your job IS to know. Pay attention. Spend more time at city hall. Also try to return phone calls (be accessible) as you promised in the campaign and promised on a mailed postcard to voters). I am being anonymous because I am a registered Republican.

 
at 12:54 PM, December 11, 2007 Blogger Mark Miller said...

I'm tickled that council is giving police the necessary budget dollars to do their duties. But why does it have to be overtime?!? If Streicher can get the job done with "high visibility" straight time, then good for him. We are in the midst of a budget crunch for Pete's sake. And cops do have personal lives; we can't just work them to death.

 
at 1:00 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would hope that working for the City and walking the streets on behalf of citizens would be as "mandatory" as court time and showing up at Krogers on the side.

 
at 1:19 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

.

Streicher should be fired, PERIOD !

He knew he was not using the money. It took an audit to discover. He was greedy and put the community at risk.

If he knew he would not utilize the money, he had an obligation to inform the city.

He could have done that and the clinics and pools could have remained opened with the funds.

Or, the administration could have hired additional officers to patrol OTR, then the county could have better served the suburbs.

Streicher did nothing but pad ($$$) his department and he got caught with his hand in the cookie jar !

Voting records indicate he pulled a wRong wingnut whacko ballot in 04 !

Doesn't surprise us he is willing to be less than candid !

Somebody owes 'stan the man' - $75 grand !

PATHETIC 'HypocRites' !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2008 !


.

 
at 1:25 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Absolutely amazing. Here you have a
department head who is saving the city money and council goes balistic. Streicher and his staff are doing a good job in reducing crime in the city. I believe it is down 8% from last year at this time. If Streicher does not need the money, council should put it to
revitalizing neighborhoods.

 
at 2:03 PM, December 11, 2007 Blogger Nasty, Brutish & Short said...

Council sets the priorities, and it's the chief's responsibility to follow them. Even if he doesn't like them, even if he think he can save money by not following them.

The Chief was totally out of line and insubordinate. He does not get to put his priorities over those of the elected officials.

 
at 2:18 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is the height of arrogance. What councilmembers know is that Tom Streicher does not give a damn about what they think, or anybody else thinks. He makes no secret of it.

But, except for Ghiz, they cower, afraid of the man with the badge.

I did not know crime was reduced to an accpetable level so we don't need more patrols in neighborhoods. Could have fooled all of my westside neighbors.

 
at 2:36 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think the reason the cash was available was because striecher decided to use foot patrols as punishment instead of a crime fighting tool. so, that meant with such a negative label attached to it that few officers would want to d it and everyone (including the public now) think that they're in trouble.
striecher has it all backwards -- it should be the best cops with the greatest pinterpersonnel skills and the trust of the community - good guys and bad - who are walking the streets -- not cops who are a disgrace t the force.
striecher really screwed this up - maybe you do need leis in otr - 'cuase Atriecher has no leadership clue.

 
at 2:44 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

More than the money, what aggravates me about the "Chief" is all of these officers getting into all of this trouble and he does not even feel the need to explain to the public why he decides to let them off easy.

How many this month? Seems like this fish is rotting from the top.

 
at 2:54 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I like how folks here are trying to derail the real issue by attacking Ghiz and others.

The fact is, Streicher defied City Council's wishes without permission.

Every beat cop knows Streicher is NOT a good chief. How many times has his "car accidents" been covered up, anyhow?

 
at 3:19 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

We want to see police walking the busy streets. Streicher is full of it.

 
at 4:04 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is not about defying the wishes of Council this is about defying the wishes of the Citizens who live here. Seems to me everyone is focusing on the Council and the Chief when it is about us! We want them doing walking patrols. We want the quality of life issues hit head on. We want that face to face with the business owners in our Communities. We want those foot patrols on our main through fares. We want it and the Council asked for it and put aside money for them and then the Chief decided he knew best and didn't do them. I find myself on a very different side of this argument than usual.. not on the side of the Police. I am not happy about that but right is right. If Council told..say street sweeping to do 100 lane miles and they decided to only do 80 lane miles and then returned that "extra" money, if you streets etc were the ones that didn't get done would you be happy??? I don't think so. I did not nor did anyone one I have spoken with in my Westside community see ANY walking patrols this past summer. NONE. That is disturbing to say the least. I am in agreement, Streicher MUST go!!!

 
at 4:06 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Stop giving money to Streicher. Give it to Leis for Sheriff's patrols.

You can bet they will use it, and use it well!

 
at 5:28 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Streicher needs to go, and this city deserves the best possible talent that we can get to run our police department. The next chief needs to be recruited via a national search, instead of appointing the guy who managed to stick around the CPD the longest, because he is 'next in line'.

Streicher stood by while the CPD went on a slow down after the riots, in fact he gave his tacit approval to the slowdown. This slow down allowed the crime in the city to get completely out of control, and now the CPD don’t have the training, leadership or initiative to out the jeannie back into the bottle.

It’s time to bring in Si and his deputies. They are better trained, lead and far more professional than the CPD.

 
at 6:29 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

We have a strong mayor system - I say he should intervene!
What'd think Mark? .... Mark??

 
at 7:01 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here's what he Enquirer IS NOT telling you. From Kevin Osborn in today's City Beat:

http://blogs.citybeat.com/porkopolis/2007/12/things-the-othe.html

Things the Other Media Don't Tell You

Here’s another reason why alternative media matters.

If Cincinnati residents depend solely on mainstream media for their news, they won't get the full story about how the police department actually spent some of the money earmarked for walking patrols or Police Chief Thomas Streicher Jr.'s defiance of city council policy. They also won’t learn how several current and former officers have spoken out against Streicher for damaging morale in the department.

Before Laure Quinlivan left WCPO-TV's I-Team last month, she had taped interviews with several current and former Cincinnati Police officers who talked about how the attitudes and favoritism on the part of Streicher and his inner circle had damaged department morale.

The interviews were taped in the Northside home of Greg Harris, a Democrat who was running for Cincinnati City Council at the time. The officers contacted Harris after he had made a campaign issue out of the Linder Report, a city-commissioned study of the police department that suggested numerous changes to improve efficiency but was generally ignored by council.

Conducted by nationally renowned police expert John Linder, the study was ordered by then-Mayor Charlie Luken in summer 2005 and completed the following December. After much badgering by CityBeat, The Enquirer and others, it finally was released publicly in June 2006.

Among its findings, the study stated the police department is “overwhelmed and defensive,” while its operating culture was described as a “systematically defensive posture hamstringing operations and affecting all basic systems.”

Perhaps more important, it stated that rank-and-file officers felt ignored and treated unfairly by department leadership. It found that there was major mistrust of supervisors by officers, with only 28.1 percent believing that discipline within the department was fair and uniform and that most police officers — 64 percent — said their supervisors are more concerned with being obeyed than understood.

Quinlivan interviewed the officers and promised to electronically obscure their faces and voices on-camera out of fear of retaliation by Streicher. The I-Team report was set to air on Sunday, Nov. 3, because Quinlivan wanted it broadcast during a ratings sweeps month and before the council election. In an Aug. 31 e-mail to Harris before the interviews, Quinlivan wrote, “Please let the police officers know that if we’re going to do a story, it must be exclusive with the I-Team. If we can agree to that, then we can give it at least 5 minutes of air time and lots of promotion.”

After Quinlivan learned she was being fired by WCPO as part of budget cuts, however, the plans changed. Quinlivan didn’t want to air such a controversial report against the chief because she was uncomfortable about not having WCPO’s protection after she left the station.

Meanwhile, Enquirer readers aren’t getting the full story about the current controversy over how Streicher spent part of the overtime money allocated for walking patrols.

In an appearance before council’s Finance Committee Monday, Streicher said he was able to accomplish the same amount of walking, bicycle and horse patrols in neighborhoods without using most of the $2.7 million in overtime that council had specifically allocated for that purpose. In the chief’s inimitable style, this was done without telling council about the change.

Some council members — notably Democrat John Cranley and Republican Leslie Ghiz — have expressed skepticism that the same amount of targeted patrols was done. For his part, Streicher told council that he didn’t believe walking patrols were an effective crime fighting tool and that the $2 million he was returning from his budget to help ward off a deficit didn’t all come from the amount set aside for overtime; it also came from other “personnel savings.”

But what Streicher side-stepped in his council appearance was the $625,000 spent on non-budgeted items. They included $125,000 for renovations to the second floor of police headquarters, where the chief’s office is located, and $300,000 for various contractual services such as landscaping at police facilities.

Other expenses included $50,000 in elevator repairs at police headquarters, $50,000 for maintenance of the municipal garage, $25,000 in postage costs and $75,000 in reimbursements to the city’s law department.

A city budget planner last week initially told council that this money came from the cash allocated for overtime. After Streicher faced a council backlash, though, he wrote in a Dec. 6 memo to the city manager that money came from the “personnel savings,” not the overtime money. The bottom line: The money wasn’t spent as authorized by city council.

These readers won’t learn about those expenditures in the Enquirer’s article today about the controversy. The issue of CityBeat that hits newsstands Wednesday looks at some of the expenses, along with more background on this developing story.

Also not mentioned in The Enquirer was a vote taken by the Finance Committee Monday to spend $100,000 on an International Police Executive Symposium that Streicher wants the city to host next May.

The committee deadlocked 3-3 on recommending the expense be approved by the full council. Opposed were Cranley, Ghiz and Chris Bortz. Supporting the expense was Jeff Berding, Roxanne Qualls and Cecil Thomas. Abstaining were Laketa Cole and David Crowley.

Usually a tie vote means an item is left in committee and doesn’t move onto the entire city council. Mayor Mark Mallory has the executive power to disregard the tie and put it on council’s agenda. Whether the $100,000 expense will be on council’s Wednesday agenda remains unclear.

How Streicher chooses to spend taxpayer money and whether he abides by city council’s wishes says a great deal about the department’s priorities and whether Cincinnati’s form of government is functioning properly. CityBeat will continue to follow this story as more details emerge.

— Kevin Osborne

 
at 8:12 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

HE HAS GOT TO GO! Can the citizens of Cincinnati charge him with something for directly disregarding council's directions?

 
at 11:08 PM, December 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

We can spend that money to fight crime in our neighborhoods by tearing down blighted buildings. $2 million could really help my neighborhood. If the chief doesn't need it, we sorely do.

 
at 2:00 PM, December 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Q: Who has made the real difference in fighting crime in Cincinnati - the CPD's "Vortex Unit" or the Sheriff's patrols of Over-the-Rhine?

A: ???

The more I hear about Chief Streicher's attitude towards walking patrols, the less I respect his management style.

 
at 9:33 PM, December 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nobody cares what Kevin Osborne writes! He is a has been reporter who now works for a left wing rag with a very small circulation. Who reads that liberal crap outside of Clifton and Northside anyway?

You libs are just mad because you can't stand to see the tax payers money go unspent! Saving money...what a novel idea?

 
at 8:48 PM, December 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Same coach, same team, same result.

Is Cincinnati safer today than 5 years ago...or $700 million ago? What a waste, but somebody has to provide the cush jobs and easy overime for those who bleed purple and FOP relatives.

TIME FOR A CHANGE!

 
at 8:48 PM, December 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Same coach, same team, same result.

Is Cincinnati safer today than 5 years ago...or $700 million ago? What a waste, but somebody has to provide the cush jobs and easy overime for those who bleed purple and FOP relatives.

TIME FOR A CHANGE!

 
at 9:29 PM, December 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kevin Osborne writes for a rag that gave a primer on how to disrupt the city during economic summit a few years back. He writes for the rag that considers TimTom a hero and the police the "enemy." Hell, his buddy and colleague wrote about how we should just make all drug use/abuse legal .
CityBeat does a fine job covering arts and entertainment. Stick to your strengths, Mr. Osborne: Cincinnati's not Yellow Springs or Alphabet City or SOMA and the drug trade is not welcome.

 
at 11:24 PM, December 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obviously the last poster (anon 9:33) doesn't even understand grammar, so his opinions are also suspect.

 
at 10:47 AM, December 14, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sober Facts, maybe you should get your facts straight. I've never seen Osbourne write a pro-drug piece, and I follow local media closely.

If you want to paint that guy by the action of his co-worker (Flannery, I assume), then let's start painting all cops by the actions of the bad apples.

You wouldn't like that now, would you?

 
at 1:36 PM, December 14, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let us have the money in Westwood to get rid of blighted and vacant buildings.

 
at 2:30 PM, December 14, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey concerned- just stating what is written in CityBeat. Leftist agenda cloaked in great arts/music coverage.

Read this week's issue for the pro-drug op-ed. And re-read my initial post. I did not say that Mr. Osborne wrote the pro-drug piece.
BTW, check your spelling, or did you have Ozzy on the brain ?

I follow local media as as closely as , or even more closely than you. I read CityBeat weekly (mainly for the music/arts coverage, but also to see the stories that don't/won't get covered in the mainstream media.)
Unified message in the news/op-ed part of the paper, from the cartoons, syndicated columns, and local writers: only dissent is in the letters to the editor.

City Beat is to conservatives as the Enquirer is to liberals. As a flaming moderate, reading each helps clarify the truth, much like reading Mein Kampf after reading The Diary of Anne Frank, or Das Kapital after Common Sense.

I find the pro-drug message of City Beat detrimental to the health and safety of our community. I would hope Kevin Osborne does as well.

 
at 1:50 PM, December 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

City Beat is a liberal rag. I'm glad that Kroger's and other reputable stores refuse to allow that trash on their premises.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck