*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Mental Health Organization Supports Issue 27

The National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) is endorsing Issue 27, the sales tax increase that would pay to build a new jail and fund public safety programs.

The national organization supports people with mental illness and their families.

Here's what it said:

“Many of the repeat visitors to the county jail system are there due to mental illness and substance abuse. Issue 27 will finally address the county’s 70 percent recidivism rate through investment in reforms and treatment,” said David Ranz, NAMI executive director. “Let’s get it right – and stop locking up mentally ill and drug/alcohol addicted citizens. Instead, let’s hold them accountable for their own recovery.”


8 Comments:

at 2:05 PM, October 16, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

“Let’s get it right – and stop locking up mentally ill and drug/alcohol addicted citizens."

Uh, it's a JAIL, correct?

and,

"Instead, let’s hold them accountable for their own recovery.”

And if they are not accountable, they go back to JAIL, correct?

My guess is the real reason NAMI is for it is that it will create jobs for its membership.

And the Cincinnati police FOP is opposed to it since it will result in more Sherif's Dept jobs and fewer for THEIR union.

So, let's review. The people whose job is to take the criminal element off the street are OPPOSED to the jail and the people who advocate rehab vs. incarceration are FOR the jail.

Is any one else confused?

 
at 2:28 PM, October 16, 2007 Blogger usefullidiot said...

Well, DUH !!!!!!

Don’t you think there could be a few million in this tax grab for important seminars in Palm Springs?

 
at 5:25 PM, October 16, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

NAMI apparently knows the way to keep their clients out of jail --- in the long run --- is to get them treatment and services.

The costs for treatment and services is far less than throwing them in jail time and time and time again.

The price to house inmates for a year - $50,000
The price to treat them for a year - $18,000
The price to finally grasp recovery and live your life -- priceless

 
at 8:58 PM, October 16, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's not just a jail. Please, don't bother voting if you're not going to bother learning about the issue.

 
at 9:03 PM, October 16, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

VOTE NO ON ISSUE 27!

 
at 12:51 AM, October 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you for convincing me to vote against the Mental Health levy. I was undecided, but this pushes me into the No camp. If these folks are admitting that all the money we already spend on Mental Health is a miserable failure, why would I want to throw any more of my money down that rat hole? We need to cut bad programs not expand them.

 
at 10:17 AM, October 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

NAMI- National Alliance of Mentally Ill is an organization of mentally ill people, not providers of Mental Health Services. They are advocates, not practitioners.

They are not associated with the Mental Health levy.

The Mental Health & Recovery Services Board is the agency that oversee the programs and the money from the Mental Health Levy.

So Nami does not profit from the passing of the jail issue and nor do they speak for the Mental Health & Recovery Services Board.

The Mental Health Levy funds services that the entire county benefits from. If it was not for the levy there would be many mentally ill adults and children who would go untreated.

 
at 10:17 PM, October 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

My Brother was mentally retarded (Downes for PC'ers) and I loved him equally (if not more) to my wife & kids. He spent the last 10 years of his life in the care of a religous organization PA that was run by people next to angels.
I couldn't have more sympathy for this except I have no reason to believe that Hamilton County is up to the task. Their Family Services program is a disaster.
I'd contribute (& will when I pass) 10 times to Friendship Community (Lititz, PA) what I'd give to Ham Co to "manage" this issue.

If there are specific proposals, let's hear them. Throwing money at the bureaucracy doesn't work.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck