*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Friday, October 12, 2007

Catholic group criticizes Chabot

Rep. Steve Chabot is under attack from members of his own religion – Catholics.

Chabot, a Republican from Westwood, is among 10 Catholic members of Congress who are being targeted in a radio ad sponsored by Catholics United for voting against legislation to expand the State Children's Health Insurance Program, known as SCHIP.
The ad was unveiled today. Listen to it HERE.

It will air primarily on Christian and talk radio stations from Monday to Wednesday, and feature a mother urging Chabot to support SCHIP, saying that voting against health care for poor children is not a "pro-life" or "pro-family" vote.

“Building a true culture of life requires public policies that promote the welfare of the most vulnerable,” said Chris Korzen, executive director of the group, said in a release. “Pro-life Christians who serve in Congress should honor this commitment by supporting health care for poor children.”

Chabot's spokesman Todd Lindgren said the ad fails to tell the whole story.

Chabot did vote against the bill to expand SCHIP, but he did so because the bill expands the SCHIP program at a huge cost without finding ways to pay for the expansion.

The House passed the SCHIP bill but it was vetoed by President Bush. The ad comes as the House is poised to vote to override the veto later this week.

“While I believe it is necessary to renew the SCHIP program and continue to help provide assistance to the children of working families without health insurance, this bill is a fiscally irresponsible approach that cannot be adequately funded,” Chabot said last month.

Chabot voted to create SCHIP in 1997 and supports renewing the program – but in a fiscally responsible way, Lindgren said.


33 Comments:

at 5:31 PM, October 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does anyone find it interesting that the top two staffers for this liberal group are former Democratic & union organizers? Oh no, they don't have an axe to grind against republicans.

 
at 8:13 PM, October 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good for Chabot. I don't think anyone has a problem with the truly poor getting health care. This program has been expanded to include people up to age 25 and families with incomes up to $83,000. This just a forerunner to government run health insurance.

 
at 8:23 PM, October 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

After the last election, there has been an insurgence of "religious" based groups that are nothing than liberal propagandists using a religious moniker to shield their motives. They think that if they give it a religious tone, people will think that liberals are "spiritual" people also.

Most are a farce.

 
at 9:22 PM, October 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

And -- these are the same folks that have looked out (actually the other way) for all those children molested by Catholic priests! Yeah that's pro-family isn't it? It was vetoed because it would remove children from private insurance and put them on the public dole! How progessive!

 
at 9:44 PM, October 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh, so now the Republicans are concerned about "fiscal responsibility," huh? Where was their "fiscal responsibility" when they created this gaping budget deficit?

It's despicable that the Republicans would prioritize tax cuts for the rich over healthcare for uninsured kids.

Steve Chabot should be ashamed of himself.

 
at 10:19 PM, October 12, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Catholic doctrine adheres to the democratic platform in all areas except abortion. It is no surprise that this organization has leadership from the democratic camp.

Real Catholics know this

 
at 1:24 AM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The US conference of Catholic Bishops and Catholic Charities USA urged Congress and and Bush to support SCHIP.

If Chabot and Jean Schmidt are truly pro-life, they will take advantage of the opportunity to do the right thing and vote to override the Presidential veto.

 
at 1:28 AM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chabot voted against the bill because it expands the SCHIP program without finding ways to pay for the expansion, according to his spokesman.

Ahem. And how does Mr. Chabot explain his votes to expand WAR without finding ways to pay for the expansion?

 
at 8:56 AM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does anyone find it interesting that Chabot lied about how the SCHIP expansion would be paid for?

"Chabot's spokesman Todd Lindgren said the ad fails to tell the whole story. Chabot did vote against the bill to expand SCHIP, but he did so because the bill expands the SCHIP program at a huge cost without finding ways to pay for the expansion."

The SCHIP expansion would be paid for by an increase in taxes on cigarettes. It is a win-win solution. Increasing cigarette prices has shown to decrease the number of kids who start smoking, which makes overall health care costs go down. In the meantime, is John Boehner has to pay a little more out of pocket to help kids while he kills himself, I honestly don't give a damn.

 
at 10:02 AM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is this the same Chabot that the wRong wingnut whacko party once claimed him to be an unstable and shell-shocked Catholic man of faith?

Now, he speaks for the fundamentalist fanatics when formally he condemned them ?

He has flip-flopped with the wRong wingnut whackos so much that he has become the poster-boy for the elimination of health insurance programs!

PATHETIC !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2007 & Little Jeffre!

 
at 12:58 PM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

ah, republicans, the party of fiscal responsibility. wait, that was in the 50's. its 50 years later and they are the party of borrow and spend, indeed they spend like drunken sailors. the only problem is that they are heartless b**t**ds and choose to spend on war and death and not life and growth.

i've had enough, have you?

vote democratic this year and in the future.

draft al gore, the only person ever elected president who did not serve.

 
at 1:15 PM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe the person advocating for the cigarette tax should take a look at the numbers. In order to fund that tax for SCHIP, we're going to need 22.4 million additional smokers to keep the program solvent. Typical tax and spend liberal thinking. Why should smokers bear the burden, especially to pay for illegal immigrants and wealthy families who are covered by the Dem-backed SCHIP program? Good for Chabot. He voted against Medicare drug bill and now this. Thank God there is some common sense in the halls of Congress.

 
at 1:37 PM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:56 Anonym

Unfortunately, you didn't realize that over 22 million new smokers would have to start smoking for the increase in the cigarette tax to cover the expansion in the program. Recent trends show that this will never happen. Not to mention, benefits for new children enrolled in the program would be cut 85% in 2012 in order to conform with the Democrats new "Pay-Go" rules on spending. The bill is full of budget gimmicks, and the Democrats are unwilling to compromise. The Democrats would rather say that the President and Steve Chabot are against health insurance for children then to actually work with Republicans. Talk about pathetic.

 
at 1:49 PM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Except tb, in order to be fully funded by the cigarette tax, SCHIP would require an INCREASE in the number of smokers. And aren't cigarette taxes a regressive tax that fall mainly on the backs of the poor anyway? I thought the democrats were against those....

 
at 2:05 PM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some ignorant fool said, "After the last election, there has been an insurgence of 'religious' based groups that are nothing than liberal propagandists using a religious moniker to shield their motives. They think that if they give it a religious tone, people will think that liberals are 'spiritual' people also. Most are a farce."

Get over it, buddy. Republicans got away with the same crap for years. I'm sure you'd say the same thing about Republicans fronts like "Focus on the Family," and bought and sold republicans like Rev. Chuck Winburn.

 
at 2:19 PM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why on earth is this ad not being run in Jean Schmidt's district as well? She also voted against the S-Chip bill.

 
at 2:21 PM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Please run this ad in Jean Schmidt's district. She also opposes the S-Chip legislation.

 
at 5:24 PM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

If the program was to pay for bombs to kill and wound and put children in hospitals then I'm sure Chabot would had been all for it... this guy is a total fraud who says he is for american families. Yikes!!!!!

 
at 9:10 PM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

tb:

what happens when you rise the price of something?

if you didn't take a basic econ class, heres a hint: demand doesn't go up.

so you want to pay for a program that will continually expand with taxes from a product in which the demand will go down, thus the tax money coming from that product will go down?

only liberals would think of something so irresponsible and ignorant.

 
at 10:33 PM, October 13, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

well, if Chabot loses the Catholic vote, he is toast. he might get the slack-jaw Right Wing Jesus Freak votes from the Incesto-American communiy, but that's not enough to win, even in Cincinnati.

 
at 1:05 AM, October 14, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chabot is teamed with the whacko COAST group so he to is against schools, pro life, and education to the detriment of our community , save a dollar and ruin society, yes he's against the jail with his COAST brothers!

 
at 1:23 AM, October 14, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

For the love of God....

Steve get a new do!!!!

Rudy GuliNazi lost his ugly comb over...

Steve get to the barber - ASAP!!!

 
at 3:34 AM, October 14, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ask Chabot about making a MILLION DOLLARS on oil stocks after ushering in the Bush-Cheney oil legislation. Or, shut up!

 
at 1:58 PM, October 14, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

WOW poor Steve Chabot, even your own church is against you. It's not supprising, with most Americans waking up to the GOP Greed and idiot Bush, Chabot has stood proud with all his neocons. Future problem for Steve; while he was taking direction from Bush, he wasn't listening to his constituants and they voted him out the FIRST CHANCE THEY GOT.

Change is comming. RIP GOP!

 
at 11:55 PM, October 14, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

C'mon, Steve Chabot! We can borrow the money from China, just like we do to finance our glorious war!

The beauty of it is that the kids who get the health care - and their children and grandchildren - are the ones who are going to be paying anyway. What's a few more billion? Put it on their tab and let us get back to the business of enjoying our big fat tax cuts!

 
at 3:29 PM, October 15, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Republicans are spreading plenty of lies about SCHIP. The nonpartisan FactCheck.org has a must-read article separating the fact from the fiction. Check it out!

 
at 9:51 AM, October 16, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

What I see in almost every message is a lot of heat and no light.

I have always believed and still do that it's my civic duty to learn as much as I can about the issues and vote accordingly.

I'm a 67 year old independent, but my oh my why would any young person be interested in politics let alone voteing if this blog is indicative of our political discourse.

Calling names and demonizing those with whom we disagree seems to be the norm, at least on this blog.
How sad.

 
at 11:10 AM, October 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chabot had no problem voting for the fiscally irresponsible Medicare prescription drug coverage that helps even the richest Americans at a cost of $730 million dollars....
but he won't vote for $35 million expansion to cover kids because it MAY help some middle-class kids... ?

 
at 11:13 AM, October 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chabot had no problem voting for the $730 millon Medicare prescription drug coverage program which benefits even the richest adults -- but he won't vote for a $35 million program that covers poor kids and some middle-class kids ?

 
at 1:04 PM, October 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey liberal moonbat @ 3:34 AM:

Congressman Steve Chabot drives a '93 Buick Century. [So much for your oil $$ theory.] He's honest, decent, and a good family man.

You are a pathetic liberal moonbat blogging from your mom's basement at 3 AM. Go back to downloading kiddie porn. Cowards like you never amount to anything in life and hate anyone who does.

 
at 2:59 PM, October 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Check your facts. Chabot voted AGAINST the Medicare Prescription drug plan even though he was under intense pressure from House and administration leadership. So much for your talking point about him marching lock step w/ Dubya. You folks are shameless liars.

 
at 8:56 PM, October 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Steve's '93 Buick is all show - just like that wonderful mess on his head.
However, if he really voted against the Medicare prescription crime, I'll vote for him forever.

 
at 7:33 PM, October 21, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chabot is terrible. A chimp with an R in front of their name could get elected in this County.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck