*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Thursday, August 02, 2007

...and the Gloves are Off

It was the longest County Commission meeting in history.

OK, maybe not, but it sure seemed like it. Almost four hours with very little accomplished other than the commissioners yelling at or about each other. As usual, it was Todd Portune and David Pepper (both Democrats) against Pat DeWine (the lone Republican.)

Think I'm exaggerating? It was so bad that during a break, staffers joked they need some girls with "Round One," "Round Two" signs!

Commissioner Pat DeWine had an especially rough day. He was blasted left and right about everything from the sales tax to budget cuts. He was also blamed for spreading malicious misinformation about his colleagues on a hot-button issue -- abortion.
Here's how it played out.


ROUND ONE:

The day started with a nasty exchange between DeWine and Sheriff Simon Leis on DeWine's opposition to Commissioners David Pepper and Todd Portune's sales tax increase. See the previous blog for more details on that.

ROUND TWO:
Then, drama unfolded over the indigent care levy, which passed last November. Apparently a clause was left out of during contract negotiations effectively allowing levy dollars to fund abortions.

DeWine discovered the problem Monday and asked his colleagues what happened. They said they didn't know, but that the clause should be put back in. Several hours later C.O.A.S.T. issued this statement blaming Portune and Pepper.

So Wednesday, it was on. Portune and Pepper spent probably the better part of an hour blaming DeWine for spreading false rumors. (They spent all day Tuesday fielding angry e-mails and phone calls)

"It seems clear that the source of COAST information came from this floor," Portune accused.

Added Pepper: "This is frankly in my five years one of the most dishonest things I’ve ever seen."

DeWine refused to take blame. They interrupted each other, talked over each other and Portune called DeWine "out of order" several times.

Finally, to stop all the fuss, Portune and Pepper passed a resolution putting the clause back in.

DeWine introduced his own solution: a blanket resolution that says Hamilton County can never spend tax dollars on abortions, period. His colleagues want it reviewed by legal staff.
UPDATE: This whole segment of this blog caused a stir, and may require further clarification. Please note, although the levy passed last year, the contract remains in negotiation. All references above involve the draft document or negotiations on it. During the discussions this week, the Health Alliance offered its take on the issue and some background on exactly how this occurred.

ROUND THREE:
DeWine also got heat Wednesday for proposing several 2007 budget cuts. This was in response to discussions about where to put 300 overflow inmates (and how to pay for it) when a housing contract with the Butler County jail runs out in October (read the Enquirer story here).

Portune and Pepper first blasted DeWine for not coming up with cuts sooner (Portune had presented his list in a letter last week.) Then they criticized the cuts as not feasible. Even Administrator Pat Thompson got a word in.

"You’re talking about (cutting) infrastructure to run this organization in a lot of instances," Thompson said. "I would never recommend some of the things on this list."

Hopefully budget meetings next week will be more civil.

BudgetReductions.doc
healthalliance.doc


24 Comments:

at 1:53 PM, August 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

How about defunding the Port Authority? How much do they get and what have they done? The Enquirer should investigate that.

Also, whats the latest with The Banks?

 
at 2:26 PM, August 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

DeWine is so close to COAST that one would think they were married.

 
at 2:58 PM, August 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pat DeWine is going down in 2008. He is nothing but a right-wing, anti-safety, anti-school, anti-gay, anti-public anything hypocritical, adulterous Repugnicant.

I am so glad we got rid of the Repugnicant cartel that has ruined this state and got rid of their majority at the county level. We are coming for the White House, and the lying Repugnicant cartel is going down there, too.

Can't wait to see Kentucky voters dispatch their Repugnicants to the curb later this year.

We need another jail- for all the crooked Repugnicants!

 
at 3:56 PM, August 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Repungicant?

Sounds like another one of your oh, so "tolerant progressives".

 
at 4:24 PM, August 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The real story in all of this is the "urbanization" of Hamilton County.

This is just another example. It is, in fact, a city council meeting of anyitme in the last 17 years.

 
at 4:39 PM, August 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

www.dumpdewine.com

 
at 4:54 PM, August 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jessica - A previous version of this item included a sentence about a COAST member being in charge of the Tax Levy board last year. Was that deleted by mistake and do you intend to re-insert that line?

The COAST member was, of course, Chris Finney, who was appointed to the Tax Levy board by his business partner, Phil Heimlich. In his disclosure statement affidavits for both the Tax Levy board and the Drake board, Finney failed to identify that he and Heimlich were business partners in Three Centurions LLC and Three Centurions 2 LLC. See for yourself. Here's Finney's Drake affivavit. See line items 21 and 22.

Finney's an attorney, licensed by the Ohio Bar. It appears he lied on two sworn documents submitted to the Ohio Attorney General.

 
at 8:17 PM, August 02, 2007 Blogger Unknown said...

Anonymous coward 4:54 PM has lied to us. Line 21 asks about a financial interest with "the Nonprofit Combination". Line 22 asks about a conflict of interest or self-interest with "the Nonprofit Combination".

Just because you make an accusation and send us to a link doesn't mean you've proven your allegation. In this case, your link disputes your own argument. Didn't you even read the file before posting it or did you think nobody else would read it themselves?

 
at 8:25 PM, August 02, 2007 Blogger Unknown said...

As for the original content of this thread, Sheriff Lies and The White Democrats are being hypocritical. First they say this jail crisis is so bad we're going to have hundreds of criminals running loose. But when DeWine offers the cuts to solve this problem, they say the cuts are too deep and can't be done.

Wait a second, I thought we were facing a prisoner crisis? If we were really facing a crisis that was going to spike the crime rate, they would identify the money needed and make the cuts elsewhere. This is an intentional campaign of lies and fear by the 3 fascists to blackmail us into voting for a massive, regressive tax hike to fund their pet projects.

These elected officials need to respect our decisions. We voted down a Sales Tax hike once and we're going to vote it down again. They will need to come up with a real plan to build a jail, and they better realize that the ultimate solution will be much closer to the DeWine plan than The White Democratic plan. Their blackmail techniques will not work.

 
at 9:09 PM, August 02, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

cincyjeff, I disagree with your interpretation of the affidavit. Finney's financial relationship could reasonably be construed to be a conflict with the Drake sale. After all, Heimlich and Finney engineered the deal to sell the hospital to the Health Alliance. (And didn't that deal turn out to be a winner?)

But I'll defer. Like many points of law, this one is worthy of debate. Perhaps you or someone else should bring it to the attention of the Ohio Bar and let them decide?

By the way, interesting that anon's post bothers you more than the fact that the president of the county commission appointed his business partner to two influential county jobs without either of them disclosing their financial relationships. No doubt you have your reasons.

Another point, why is anon 4:54 a coward for remaining anonymous. After all, you post using a pseud.

For those paying attention, the third Centurion in the Heimlich-Finney businesses is named "jeff," too: Jeff Eichhorn. He used to work for Jim Petro when he was AG. That Jeff is now commercial real estate up in Lebanon if anyone's interested.)

In any case, you seem overheated. Any particular reason you'd like to share with the class?

 
at 1:56 AM, August 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

You know, there is one line in DeWine's budget cuts that is VERY telling - he wants to cut $2M from Juvenile Court Programs.

Juvenile Court programs serve at risk kids - kids with families in trauma - children who have been molested, foster children, kids getting in trouble because of other life factors they were born into.
Cutting services to children and making such a dramatic cut to be borne by these disadvantaged children - in our community, with the children's services problems we have - is utterly disgusting.

RESIGN DEWINE! RESIGN DEWINE!

Our children can't afford your fiscal policies.

 
at 9:35 AM, August 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

DeWine also wants to cut a program that intervenes to identify and get back onto a positive path high school dropouts. By cutting the program for a whole year, he would rent TWO WEEKS of jail beds at Butler County. (I guess so DeWine can lock the high school dropouts up). This is the right-wing/COAST/DeWine priorities for you.

CincyJeff, DeWine's list is a complete joke. All it does is allow the County to continue Butler County for 2 months-and that's it. And his numbers are completely inconsistent with the budget office's own numbres on how much those cuts would actually generate. Some proposed cuts are not even legal under Ohio law. Others would lead to lawsuits that the County would lose.

Just like with his abortion lie, DeWine is caught in a massive fraud on the voters (saying for months he had a way to pay for a new jail without a tax increase), and he now has no answers. He can't even find a way to continue Butler County for a year, let alone build and operate the new jail he says we need.

 
at 9:52 AM, August 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The reason Finney's name was taken out is because he is calling around and lying and saying that the TLRC had nothing to do with the indigent care levy last year (because Pepper pointed out, accurately, that the change to the abortion policy happened last year, under Heimlich/Roberts/FInney's watch), not this year.

Finney/COAST attacked Pepper/Portune about a policy scre-up that THEY and their right-wing cronies themselves made (although apparently by mistake). And now that they started the firestorm with their outrageous attack email, Finney's trying to duck and hide, and get his name out of it.

 
at 10:44 AM, August 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Anon - Look at Portune's list of recommendations too. He also proposes a $2 million cut to Juvenile COurt programs. Try for a second to see past your hatred for all things Republican and look at the facts.

 
at 11:50 AM, August 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 10:44 am: Portune's Safety Plan includes measures that will increase the funding for Juvenile Court programs.

 
at 12:44 PM, August 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Re: The Case of the Mysterious Disappearing "Abortion Ban Wording"

This situation with the hospital contract is the political equivalent of a missing bottle of whiskey, with two alcoholics saying the two tee-totalers took it.
If pro-abortion Commissioners Pepper & Portune didn't engineer a sneaky move to delete the abortion ban wording, then this is a coincidence of monumental proportions!
To Mr. Pepper & Mr. Portune I say, "Sorry if we're skeptical, fellas, but it's a stretch to believe pro-lifers Phil Heimlich & Pat DeWine would've yanked the abortion ban."

 
at 1:26 PM, August 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've noticed a disturbing trend. Ever since it's been clear the petitioners would turn in the required number of signatures, there has been a spike in the number of personal attacks against the high profile supporters of this effort.

The pro-tax side is making less and less of an effort to discuss the issues, choosing instead to spend more of their efforts making this about personal attacks. I think it says a lot about how they view their own proposal. If they were proud of their proposal they'd be happy to discuss the merits of it. Of course, if that was the case they would have presented it to the voters in the first place instead of try to sneak it by us.

 
at 1:30 PM, August 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

anonymous 9:35, if you check the doc. file posted here you'll see that DeWine included cuts for both this year and next.

 
at 5:30 PM, August 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 12:44 pm

The facts are absolutely clear. A mistake was made in 2006 under the Heimlich/DeWine/Finney/Roberts regime. (Read the email from the Health Alliance--which has no axe to grind, or agenda). The prior regime did not intend it, but they removed the language. Very simple.

When the mistake was discovered on Monday, Portune and Pepper immediately told DeWine that they agreed it would be corrected.

Rather than simply solve the problem, DeWine and COAST wanted to score political points, so the smear campaign began with their nasty emails that went all over the place (even though Portune and Pepper had already made their position clear).

But they were so sloppy, and did such a poor job looking into what really happened, and Pepper and Portune responded so quickly to the discovery of the mistake, that in their effort to smear Pepper and Portune, the whole thing backfired on DeWine/COAST/Finney.

Now they're trying to blame Pepper and Portune for NOT CATCHING the mistake THEY CREATED when they were in charge.

But DeWine knows, and all documents will show, that the negotiations since January have been conducted by the Prosecutor's office, and the drafts were only presented to the commissioners in the last couple weeks.

These guys are clowns, and this is one that's so clear they can't even lie their way out of it.

 
at 5:35 PM, August 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

DeWine came up with these cuts in one day. They won't withstand the light of day. They guy has no plan, never had a plan, and just keeps making stuff up so he'll survive next year's primary.

Court Reporters? The hotel tax? Newspaper subscriptions? Firing the County receptionist? End building and capital maintenance (good thinking in light of the bridge collapse)? No new technology? Sometimes, he's double-counting. Other times, his number are way off what the actual budget savings are. Ohter times, he's making cuts that he has no authority to make, or raising other elected officials' funds. Next week's meeting will be ugly as people discover what a fraud DeWine really is.

And even if EVERY CUT he proposed could happen (and made sense), he still has only identified enough money to keep Butler County going for two months. No new jail (as he promised he could do). No operation of a jail (as he promised he could do). No balanced budget for 2008 (which is required).

This guy has misled the citizens for months, and it's coming out in every meeting.

 
at 7:44 AM, August 04, 2007 Blogger Unknown said...

Blaming Heimlich and DeWine for this possible attempt by our pro-abortion Commissioners to provide taxpayer-funded abortions is not supported by the facts. From the document provided by the Health Alliance: "To refresh your memory, we began our contract negotiations and discussions with the County Administration and the Prosecutor's office late last year and only recently concluded them."

Phil Heimlich lost his re-election in November 2006, the same day this levy passed. Negotiations started shortly after that right as Heimlich was a lame-duck Commissioner leaving office. For over 6 months this contract has been negotiated under a Democratic-controlled County Commission whose President is named Todd Portune. The White Democrats wanted to be responsible for running county government, so when are they going to start taking responsibility for their actions?

I can't say with 100% certainty whether pro-abortionists Pepper and Portune intentionally tried to back door taxpayer funding of abortions. What is obvious, however, is that their denials are betrayed by their refusal to enact Pat DeWine's motion to make it official County policy to ban taxpayer funding of abortions. It makes you wonder if they're going to try something down the road.

 
at 9:48 AM, August 04, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

CincyJeff-

Read the COAST email. While even you admit that Pepper and Portune did not intend it, they went on the attack from the get go even after Pepper and Portune had made their positions clear to their "colleague" hours before. Their email was absurd and shameful, particularly since the Health Alliance email shows that the origination of the change came from the 2006 negotiations, and more general changes pushed through by Heimlich/Roberts at that time. (The Health Alliance wrote that--not Portune and Pepper).

DeWine's motion could very well be an immediate violation of collective bargaining law, not to mention a whole host of other problems, so they responsibly asked for it to be referred.

 
at 12:18 PM, August 04, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

If Portune and Pepper would stand up and loudly proclaim their support for a woman's right to choose, they'd help steer the message away from the familiar hysterical rhetoric practiced by wee Jim Urling and cincyjeff.

These creeps are all on the run. Heimlich's kaput, Finney's still in hiding, and Brinkman got spanked out of the Ohio 2nd race.

How about a little pushback, Todd and David? If you're not up to the job, let's bring in some stronger Dems who won't buckle at the first peep from the COAST weenies.

 
at 7:55 AM, August 06, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Allowing the indigent care levy to provide abortions would be the end of the indigent care levy. Whether you're pro-choice or pro-life, Portune and Pepper did the right thing.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck