*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Resolutions by Cole and Thomas

It seemed like an odd thing for a city councilman to hesitate on, a resolution in support of the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health relocating in Bond Hill as opposed to in Clermont County.

But when Laketa Cole's resolution to do just that came up for a vote Wednesday, Cecil Thomas paused. Then, holding the resolution in his hand, he paused a little longer and smiled. Then he voted yes, as the rest of the nine did.

Thomas explained later that he was a little annoyed that Cole wanted her resolution to slide right through, while two weeks earlier his resolution in support of his unity statement had to be sent to a committee because Cole and others had questions. It ultimately passed unanimously Wednesday also, but not without Thomas trying to make his point.

"I was just reminding her," he said.

Labels:


3 Comments:

at 9:04 AM, May 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

is he kidding?

 
at 2:46 PM, May 11, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

hahahaha! good for him. i was there when she threw a fit at a council meeting because she needed "time" to read a unity resolution that she knew she was going to vote for anyway. she deserves it.

 
at 12:32 AM, July 10, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

That is exactly why citizens say we dont know what we are doing. Playing tic or tact is really childish.

I didnt ask for the resolution to pass without questions, however the BondHill community did. If he had questions I would have been happy to answer it. But rather make a point. And the only point was made was either on of childlike behavior or being against a neighborhood who wanted improvement and to have a Council person play games, is just childish.

I did not object to his resolution, but I did have a question, because there was a statement where it appeared to be binding Council and I wanted to know what it meant. Let me also point out he had just passed the resolution out, while the Bondhill resolution had been on his desk since before the meeting started.

I am voted by the citizens and they do not expect me to rubber stamp something just because it says unity. It is important to understand what we are voting on and for, it is a rare occassion that I vote on something and then say "what did we just vote on?"
Citizens expect me to know what I am voting on and if I do not I ask questions.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck