Ohio voting rights talk of the Nation and elsewhere
Fallout from last month's Rolling Stone article on Ohio's 2004 voting problems barely cooled. . . and along comes the July 17 edition of The Nation featuring an article on Ohio's past and future voting concerns.
Titled, "The Coming Ballot Meltdown," the article by Andrew Gumbel foretells problems in upcoming elections. Peg Rosenfield, a former Secretary of State employee who has served as an elections specialist for more than 20 years with the League of Women Voters of Ohio, offered this assessment on why chaos ensues locally on election day: "It's not that anyone will be out to steal the election necessarily,'' Rosenfield told The Nation. "They don't need to -- we can screw it up all by ourselves.''
The full article appears here:
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060717/gumbel
New reaction to Robert F. Kennedy's article, "Was the 2004 Election Stolen?" including by former President Clinton, and word of a lawsuit to be filed by RFK and others is posted here:
http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs
and here:
http://www.rochester-citynews.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A4545
Meanwhile, a coalition of civic groups said it will announce legal action on new Ohio voter registration requirements Thursday at a Cleveland news conference, at 10 a.m. on the front steps of the Carl B. Stokes Federal Courthouse.
Plaintiffs in the lawsuit include Project Vote, ACORN, People For the American Way Foundation, Communities of Faith Assemblies Church and Common Cause Ohio. All the groups conduct voter registration drives they say are hampered by new state requirements.
The voting rights debate also has heated up in Congress and at the Statehouse.
In the race for Ohio's 1st District, Democrat John Cranley will be joined at a Friday news conference by U.S. Rep. Artur Davis, who represents Birmingham and Selma, Ala., in the 7th District. Also speaking at the 11 a.m. news conference at Integrity Hall, 2081 Seymour Ave., Bond Hill, will be the Rev. Fred Shuttlesworth and former Cincinnati Vice Mayor Alicia Reece. According to campaign spokesman Elliott Ruther, Cranley plans to take a "voting rights" pledge. Reauthorization of the federal Voting Rights Act is being debated by Congress.
At the Statehouse, meanwhile, Democrats today urged Congress to pass the Voting Rights Act.
State Senate Democratic Whip Teresa Fedor of Toledo sponsored the Ohio resolution. Congressional Republicans recently prevented the federal act, formally titled, "The Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks and Coretta Scott King Voting Rights Act Reauthorization and Amendment Act of 2006" from being reauthorized, insisting on changes.
State Rep. Lance T. Mason, a Shaker Heights Democrat, said he plans to introduce a similar voting rights resolution in the Ohio House.
The federal Act was first passed in 1965 to ensure voting rights of African Americans. Before its passage, many African Americans were subjected to literacy tests, poll taxes and other scare tactics to keep them away from the polls.
When then-President Johnson signed the federal act, he said, "There is no Negro problem. There is no Southern problem. There is only an American problem. . .Every American citizen must have the right to vote. . ."
"I believe that America still has a problem," Fedor said in a prepared statement. "Ohio still has a problem. We have had more than our fair share of voter suppression tactics and schemes just in the past few years. While our men and women are overseas trying to help Iraqis win the right to vote, it is shameful that Republicans at home would prevent renewing the Voting Rights Act."
"Ohio and other states are returning to schemes reminiscent of poll taxes, literacy tests, and other Jim Crow-like behavior," Fedor said. "The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was historic. Unfortunately, 41 years later we still have a lot of work to do in ensuring every eligible American has the right to vote. Without question, America still has a problem, and that is why I am urging Congress to reauthorize this Act."
14 Comments:
Meanwhile, a coalition of civic groups plan to announce legal action on new Ohio voter registration requirements Thursday during a news conference in Cleveland.
I think you mean "... coalition of civic groups plans to ..."
But then, it's the Enquirer you work for. Somehow I am not surprised.
It's amazing that we are at a point that Voting Rights is an issue.
Rather than do something for the people, Republicans like Blackwell and Chabot actually try to suppress the vote. It just sounds too crazy to be true.
Still, Ken Blackwell riggs the rules. Steve Chabot wants to gag all nonprofits from registering people to vote.
Then, these same GOP bozos try to "spread Democracy" in exchange for oil.
Big Jon attempts to resurrect himself !!
Why do you need to be shamed into action ??
Where does it say plan? And who do you work for?
BILL CLINTON says of RFK Jrs' Rolling Stone article:
" I thought Robert Kennedy made a very persuasive case and what was clear is that the Secretary of State (of Ohio), now their candidate for governor, was a world class expert in voter suppression and that he was doing everything he could to keep voters that he thought were Democrats from voting, in every way that he could.”
IT'S TIME FOR A REAL INVESTIGATION OF '04 ELECTION TO OCCUR WITH CLOSE SCUTINY OF THE ROLE J KENNETH BLACKWELL PLAYED IN SUPPRESSION OF DEMOCRATIC VOTES. HIS MISMANAGEMENT OF ELECTIONS, SHOWN IN HIS OWN INVESTIGATION OF LUCAS COUNTY :
http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/elections/lucas.htm
This report includes the fact that REPUBLICAN VOLUNTEERS were allowed UNSUPERVISED ACCESS to UNSECURED BALLOTS prior to the election, as well as this list:
*failure to maintain ballot security
*Inability to implement and maintain a trackable system for voter ballot reconciliation .
*failure to prepare and develop a plan for the processing of the voluminous amount of voter registration forms received.
*issuance and acceptance of incorrect absentee ballot forms.
*manipulation of the process involving the 3% recount.
*disjointed implementation of the Directive regarding the removal of Nader and Camejo from the ballot .
*failure to properly issue hospital ballots in accordance with statutory requirements.
*failure to maintain the security of poll books during the official canvass
*failure to examine campaign finance reports in a timely manner.
*failure to guard and protect public documents. ETC.
IS INDICATIVE NOT ONLY OF HIS POOR MANAGEMENT SKILLS BUT HIS WILLINGNESS TO PUT HIS POLITICAL ASPIRATIONS OVER HIS OATH TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION.
Blackwell helped Bush in FL just after the election in 2000 and became a millionaire in 2001 while in office.
Rolling Stone : Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
Blackwell, in fact, served as the ''principal electoral system adviser'' for Bush during the 2000 recount in Florida,(45) where he witnessed firsthand the ...
www.rollingstone.com/news/story/ 10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen
AND THIS FROM AN ARTICLE BY MARK NAYMIK OF THE CLEVELAND PLAIN DEALER:
Ohio Gov. George Voinovich appointed Blackwell to fill the vacant state treasurer's seat in early 1994, which Blackwell successfully defended in November of that year.
Meanwhile, he was on his way to becoming a wealthy man, investing in a Cincinnati-based broadcast company whose sale in 2001 made him a millionaire.
Blackwell showed party loyalty in 1998 by agreeing to stay out of the gubernatorial primary so Bob Taft - the choice of party leaders - could run without major opposition.
http://www.knowledgeplex.org/news/162509.html
FROM THE ANDREW GUMBEL ARTICLE:
It would be bad enough if Blackwell were acting merely to benefit his party, as he did in 2004. But in this case he's taking advantage of his office to act on behalf of his own ambitions. Unless something changes between now and November, he will remain in charge of counting the votes--his own and everyone else's. In a pivotal election in a pivotal state, this is far from reassuring. As Peg Rosenfield, an elections specialist with the League of Women Voters of Ohio who spent twelve years working in the secretary of state's office in the pre-Blackwell era, put it, "If you think '04 was a mess, just wait. I anticipate a debacle."
When votes are counted in total secrecy by partisans of one side or the other without audits or any way to verify the accuracy of the count, this cannot be a democracy by definition, whether it takes place in OH or anywhere in the world. Elections officials need to realize their loyalty is to the voters, not the voting machine vendors.
5:59 anon
since "groups" are plural you need a plural verb so "plan" is correct not "plans".
12:17 anon
The operative word is coalition.
With most of the paper evidence about to be shredded, discovery denied in Moss v. Bush, and the improper '04 recount, it's likely we will never settle the fraud issue.
What's clear is that the '04 election was a travesty to free, fair and accurate elections in Ohio, and the Secretary of State is the chief election officer. Timely registrations were not processed, registrations were improperly challenged, machines selectively allocated, and almost one-fourth of provisional ballots discarded. Even forgetting the likelihood of widespread fraud there was a de facto--if not strategic--vote suppression in Ohio. This year it gets worse with restrictive voter ID requirements and regressive voter registration rules. That's a tragedy for democracy in America.
We need the Voting Rights Act renewed, the machines dumped, and partisans out of election administration.
Anon @ 12:17,
Gee, thanks! Maybe you should read this first.
Instead of believing someone like Robert Kennedy, lifelong Democrat and wannabe president, why don't you look at the real evidence.
Here is what the Democratic National Committee's (DNC) own investigation stated:
The DNC Voting Rights Institute’s report on the election in Ohio, released on June 22, 2005, rejected claims that widespread fraud cost Kerry the election in Ohio. The DNC’s “statistical study of precinct-level data does not suggest the occurrence of widespread fraud that systematically misallocated votes from Kerry to Bush.” The DNC’s experts found that the similarity between the vote patterns for Kerry in 2004 and the Democrat gubernatorial candidate in 2002 was “strong evidence against the claim that widespread fraud systematically misallocated votes from Kerry to Bush.”
http://www.ac4vr.com/reports/072005/ohio.html
From the American Center for Voting Rights, run by a former member of the DNC.
RE The DNC Report
They failed to look at the mountain of evidence that was obtained through public hearings and grassroot efforts. Why would they do this, you might ask? Because admitting they failed the voters would make them look weak and more importantly to them WOULD DRY UP THE FUNDRAISING $. This is not about Kerry vs Bush or Dem vs Republican. The issue here is whether the outcome of elections reflects the will of the people. We have an equal protection clause in our constitution, it should apply to all voters.
The Dems have failed to bring up the GAO REPORT ON ELECTRONIC VOTING-a non partisan report issued from within the government. Why would they not bring this up? (It was released last fall. )
This is an issue of great importance. There must be integrity in the system. There must be verifiability and transparency, as well. Our elections must NOT be privatized to partisan corporations. There should be paper ballots counted at the precinct level with public observance of the counting.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.
<< Home