*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Barrett drops a bomb on Dems; says "sayanora''

It's not easy leaving a roomful of politicians speechless, but State Rep. Catherine Barrett pulled it off Wednesday night, when she told the Hamilton County Democratic Party executive committee she is dropping out of the 9th Ohio Senate District race.

Democratic party leaders gathered in the basement of the Norwood Community Center Wednesday night for the purpose of deciding whether or not to endorse in several primary contests, including the 9th District, where Barrett was taking on State Sen. Eric Kearney, who was appointed to the job in January when Mark Mallory left to become Cincinnati's mayor.

Barrett, who is about to be term-limited out of the Ohio House, was sore at being passed over in favor of Kearney for the appointment, so she launched a campaign to defeat Kearney in the May 2 primary.

This opened up the prospect of a costly and assuredly nasty primary battle that many in the paraty wanted to avoid.

Party leaders decided to split the baby. State Rep. Steve Driehaus and Tyrone Yates played the role of Solomon as the co-chairs of the party's nominating committee. They recommended that the party's executive give both candidates a party endorsement, but before that could be acted on, Barrett got up in front of the group Wednesday night and said she was quitting the race.

"I want a healing process tonight,'' said Barrett, who a standing ovation from the group.

Party leaders applauded; and also breathed a sigh of relief.

Kearney said Barrett's announcement took him as much by surprise as it did the rest of the Democrats in the room. Her decision, Kearney said, may have had something to do with the fact that he has raised at least five times as much campaign money and had polling that showed far ahead.

But Kearney gave Barrett credit.

"It took a lot of gets for her to get up there and do that,'' Kearney said.


22 Comments:

at 11:53 PM, March 22, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

**

Not your best work Hugable:

You usually spell check and proof read your bias reports.

Did those party leaders have an open bar again ?

**

 
at 12:00 AM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

it took a lot of guts for Kearny to admit that he published that useless rag of a newspaper (the Herald)

 
at 12:04 AM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I liked Gaby Downey.

She expressed a grace and humbleness for which the middle class can relate.

If all it takes is a genuine desire to represent a body of peers she would win the review.

Unfortunately it is more about the money to win.

That is a shame, she would make an excellent representative.

**

 
at 1:26 AM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Howard:
Let's see if you can start really doing some reporting. First of all, Barrett announced her intentions to run for this seat in April 2005. As a political reporter you are off your beat. When she sought to reannounce the matter in the summer of 2005, during a hotly contested mayoral race, she was asked to hold off by particular local party leaders until the heat was over. Reporters used to get to know their venues, evidently the Enquirer does not require this matter.

Sore, no Howard, she, and other Democrats were hurt, especially well qualified members of the party who also interviewed. She had plan the run regardless of what happened. She is no knee-jerk reactionary. A formal letter for 4 of the 6 candidates heaped them all intoone letter to let them represent themselves and present their wares. Barrett wnet into her interview with around $20,000 available and the pledges of close to $100,000 if she were appointed. The appointee's named was pencilled in as addendum on the letter for the 4 of 5 campaign proven and registered Democrats interviewing. In case you ever need them, I have the e-mails for the exchange between myself and the State Senate administrative person showing that there was no written record submitted for Mallory's replacement as there was for the rest; only phone conversations with "people" was noted in my phone contacts. Seems like an awful responsible position to go on the words via phone and with no written statements.

Barrett was on target November 8th with the mayoral race ended; I came on board that evening. Officially done on December 15th; you were there. The interesting fact that your paper has not covered a non-Democrat with a tepid personal citizen voting record is interesting; that's the appointee, not Barrett. BOE has all of the records. Man hasn't voted as a Democrat for close to 9 years; most recent party visibility was as a Republican. These are facts Howard. Please report them AND interview the person who is the main topic of your article.

The nasty battle has not been Representative Barrett's, it has been waged from day one by lack of Democratic leadership which 1)refused to place her name on the lists for tax contributions when it was known she was running, 2)"HACKETTING" her access to funds she has applied for in endorsements through PACs/Unions. Howard, working with a candidate like Barrett is a pleasure in that she is a professional businesswoman citizen servant and dedicated to the benfits of all members of the Democratic unit, especially the grassroots organizations. She has 7 of 8 strong wins, 4 of them coming in the 31st/32nd House. The contender's efforts was one loss.

Costly, hell yes. Costly to the heart and soul of the Democratic party that has already been fractured, drawn and quartered during the last 6 years. Barrett's other races were run on small funds and great solid connection in the communities. When you field over 61% of the vote in 3 races with oppponets, then have the Republicans leave you alone in a year when they could have sunk money into the 32nd seat, 2004's Bush-Cheney vs. Kerry-Edwards race, you have earned the base and the allegiance from the voters.

Driehaus and Yates are to be both commended and otherwise tremendously respected for their efforts with the overall scope of their committees. These men are as committed to the health of both the Democratic process as they are to their constituents, both in the party and in the 31st and 32nd respectively. Efforts like theirs and dedicated Democratic regulars have held this party together, and now coming forward to heal divides.

The recommendation committee was a duly balanced act that can be delineated at another time. The members of the group looked at candidates for several races, not just the 9th. Let's just say that for half of a co-chair to continue to cross the bounds of leadership, and trying to enforce his personal opinion for a selection, in any race, is offensive to the process itself and the service of the party. That committee ended about 6 weeks ago and the half co-chair held on as long as he could to convene this matter yesterday evening.

The standing ovation came from a gathering that contained over 80 Barrett supporters. The decision was made after Barrett arrived. Howard, I am Catherine's campaign manager, money is a factor. Capping a candidate who is a dedicated Democrat for a backroom deal spun with glitz and loyalties owed outside of the party is bad enough, but our meeting was about the many people disenfranchised by this local party. This was not just about this race, it's about the love of the constituents and the respect and dedication a citizen servant owes them first over business connections and debts to be paid off.

Howard, some breathed a sigh of relief, others are aghast, and some are now unsure where their futures are. When the book is printed about this race, it will be interesting who is true to Democratic Blue....and who just doesn't give a damn. Barrett gives a damn, will continue in her positon as a duly elected by the citizenry official who was the only registered Democrat in the 9th race (still not made it to the BOE?).

Kearney's speculation on money has some merit, but both our recent push polls and extended poll showed more interactive recognition for Barrett at over 11 points in both situations. So the surprise for me tonight is a bit great......but it is with the pride of recognizing that, in the rugged nastiness of politics, where a seasoned vateran ahould have been hateful, Barrett is the winner. Her forthrightness in care and helping steer the party toward a new day through healing and activist participation is the example that serves as bedrock for the energizing of the local party.

Catherine Barrett's dedication with respect to her party is not a commendable as much as it is a mark of great character, courage, and true concern for the real big guns for HCDP......the hardworking activists that made her campaign able to be participative for both Democrats and citizens who demand their officials be responsible to them and not the big L....lobbyists.

Any e-mail or Columbus research you need on this matter, Howard?
Just let me know. We did not lose a candidate tonight....we gained back the heart of the party based on a true Democrat's principle of service to all citizens.
Jenny Edwards,
Campaign Manager
Barrett for 9th Ohio Senate

 
at 7:32 AM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hate to say it but this loyal Dem who bleeds blue will have a very hard time voting for Kearney. It won't be that hard to decide not to vote for him. Since I've never voted for a Republican before, why start now? I hope Kearney gets spanked and the party learns a lesson.

 
at 7:45 AM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

What? A democrat can read? (the handwriting on the wall)

 
at 10:37 AM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Catherine Barrett is a class act.

 
at 11:16 AM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Catherine Barrett is a class act! It takes a special person to take such a bold move.

At this point I don't think they can even take Rep. Barrett's name off the ballot. I say we vote for her ANYWAY, anyone who exhibits this amount of character and integrity is a person I want to see representing me in Columbus.

 
at 1:03 PM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Some don't know Senator Kearney, apparently.

He co-chaired the (05) Democratic Municipal Judicial selection committee and worked tirelessly to assist a slate of honorable candidates.

This is the first line where a citizen is likely to become involved in the system.

The grassroots, for the most part, ignored this critical opportunity and instead focused their attention on the mayoral race.

As such, we were only able to place one new endorsed Democrat on the bench, the Honorable Ted Berry.

The point being, because the grass roots wasted an exceptional opportunity, they have no clue of the fabulous contribution Senator Kearney made to HIS great local party.

The people who claim to be in the know apparently, don't know "Schmidt."

It is an honor to have you as Senator, Honorable Kearney !

Signed,

Former Judicial Committee person !

 
at 1:38 PM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

It wasn't "his party' all those years he never voted or pulled a Dem ballot. I'm guessing it became his "adopted party' when he decided he'd go after the Senate seat.

 
at 1:45 PM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not true. You apparently did not read the prior post.

Kearney had no idea that Mallory would win or that the position would even be available to seek, for him.

He was approached with a suggestion, outside the party leadership, and pursued it.

You just don't know "Schmidt', period.


**

 
at 1:48 PM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is this the SAME Kearney who was at Steve Reeces' annaversary party? He claimed that he was supposed to bring a Proclamation but couldn't bring it because he didn't know how to get one passed!

Look, anyone sitting in a Senate seat that cant even get something ceremonial done is NOT who I want representing me in Hamilton County.

 
at 2:03 PM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Learning bumps in the road.

First, one would have to believe your arguments as factual.

Your credibility has certainly been placed in question.

Second, get over your bitterness, your candidate pulled out.

I think it becomes real clear who the (R)wrong wing member is in this argument !

Now:

Moveon .org

**

 
at 2:12 PM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

If you think Barrett made her decision blindly, think again.

She spoke to all the right people.

She decided to devote her efforts to electing a great governor.

Her actions will not go unnoticed.

We should all unite behind her great leadership and elect her chosen candidate for governor.

The citizens of Ohio, deserve no less.

Thank you Honorable Barrett for placing your state and country above yourself.

We can all learn something from your courage.

**

 
at 8:25 PM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I find it quite interesting that Jenny Edwards is whining about how her canidate got screwed in this process since she was a disaster when she co-chaired the party selection for city council canidates!When she had the chance to make fair edorsements she was nothing more than a lap dog for Tim Burke.She pushed a pre selected group of canidates and now the party is doing the same to her. If she would of shown some integrity then she would have credibilty now!

 
at 9:27 PM, March 23, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 1:45- "you don't know Schmidt" wasn't clever the first time you said it, much less a second time. What makes you think Kearney wasn't primed to run just in case Mallory won? How incredibly naive/stupid you are, oh esteemed judicial committee member- we're not worthy...

 
at 9:27 AM, March 24, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

At 3/23/2006 8:25 PM, Anonymous said...

Gasp! The same Jenny Edwards who let herself be bullied by Burke and Jenny O'Donnell into endorsing Jeff Berding when the nominating committee didn't want to . . . forcing a rushed process, throwing off those "unruly" committee members who refused to support Berding, and forcing a vote of the full slate as oppossed to individula candidates.

 
at 10:26 AM, March 24, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

How incredibly naive/stupid you are, oh esteemed judicial committee member- we're not worthy...

I don't agree with you because he would have been one of the first to jump in, not the last.

Ms. anon - felling insecure, know nothing, please don't make be bow to the powers, "can of Schmidt".

You have the opportunity to serve. Honorable Kearney did.

There are doer's and wannabe.

We know where you are.

Useless, in action and words.

Now go abort yourself !

**

 
at 9:37 AM, March 25, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Barrett has dignity and set an example for others to follow. The democratic party is sinking deeper into the belief that money wins elections. Money is important but ideas and integrity win elections. Focusing on the money is what the republicans have done for years. They have more of it than the sell out democrats will ever have. We have a party full of wannabe republicans and the rank and file have been misled down the wrong path. Party leadership has been compromised by Burke and the boys. What a disgrace for citizens that care about good government.

Until the democratic party begins to operate on principles once again we will continue to surrender political power to the ruling class.

 
at 9:49 AM, March 25, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Hamilton County Democratic Party once again demonstrated its weakness by using underhanded and backroom tactics that undermine fairness, the democratic process, and its own "values". In the long run, a party cannot survive and grow this way.

A Special Correspondent

 
at 6:54 PM, March 25, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Surrender - They have it !

Even if they are, as you call them (R), they have pined the (D) badge upon themselves.

If you think that the wrong wing would not accept any of our candidates in their party, think again.

In fact, we'll take any (R) into the Democratic party.

If fact if there are 20 Senators who would like to become Democrats because they don't like the way that wrong wing nut has abused his power, we welcome you with open arms.

As Bob Barker would say:

Hey (R) Senators, Congressman -

Come on Down !

--

 
at 12:02 AM, March 26, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Did we witness an attempt to keep
the women candidates from receiving
HCDP endorsements last Wednesday?
It was interesting to note how many attendees walked out long before the meeting had concluded.
Did someone ring the bell and let the class out? I did not hear a bell ring...
The War Cry has been RUN Dems RUN-
become a candidate for THE party!
Yup we will see who will step up to the plate in 2007 & 2008, so they too can be HACKETTED by their
own and be replaced by a player with the so called "RIGHT CREDENTIALS"! Should we choose a male pupil from Yale, Brown, Stanford or simply William & Mary? If you wish to run in OHIO as a DEM, get your name on a few nonprofit boards,do nothing, by all means do not give the organizations any of your hard earned money to such organizaitons, do not fill your full term (a method to enhance one's curriculum vitae).Hold fundraisers for damaged goods from the other party to pay for favors. Act cutesy and humble.
Marry into money. Take elocution and acting lessons. Join the "Future
Legislators of Ohio" (I heard Taft will be the big daddy) and by all means major in journalism and politics at an institution of higher learning. Hint: some of the Ivy Leagues are now admitting students whose parents make less than $50,000 annually. Education will be fully funded. What a way to go! Always,always work hard on developing your persona. Avoid political party affiliation-honey it never matters.
What if on the day of the Primary
not one Democrat comes out to vote in the 9th District: Squash goes the pumpkin.

So says we, the members of the "CINCINNATI LADIES CLUB OF HOUSEWIVES AND SOCCER MOMS".
Ladies get out of the VOTE!

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck