*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Hackett on Hardball - Transcripts

Here's the transcript from Paul Hackett's appearance on MSNBC's Hardball last night, courtesy of MSNBC:

FORMER OHIO SENATE HOPEFUL PAUL HACKETT TALKED EXCLUSIVELY TO CHRIS MATTHEWS TONIGHT ON "HARDBALL WITH CHRIS MATTHEWS" (5 PM and 7 PM ET)
SECAUCUS, NJ - February 20, 2006 - In his first television interview since withdrawing from the Ohio Senate primary race, Paul Hackett talked to Chris Matthews tonight on MSNBC's "Hardball with Chris Matthews" (5 p.m. ET and 7 p.m. ET). Hackett was seeking the Democratic Party's nomination in a race that will challenge Republican incumbent Mike DeWine. Last year, Hackett narrowly lost to Republican Jean Schmidt in the Ohio congressional race. Hackett's interview aired live at 5 p.m. (ET) and will repeat at 7 p.m. (ET).
Below is the entire transcript from tonight's interview.
"Hardball telecasts Monday through Friday at 5 p.m. and 7 p.m. (ET). Tammy Haddad is executive producer.
****
CHRIS MATTHEWS, MSNBC HARDBALL HOST: Joining me now is Paul Hackett in his first television interview since ending his run for the U.S. Senate in Ohio.
Major Hackett, thank you for joining us.
HACKETT: Sir, thanks for having me on.
MATTHEWS: You know, I, as a journalist and as a person who loves to watch big debates in this country, was hoping that your race would be one of the races in that country we could all watch this November and say now there's a guy who thinks the war in Iraq is wrong, the wrong policy. He's taken on the policy. The voters are going to get to vote on this war.
Now they don't get that chance, do they, because you pulled out?
HACKETT: That's true I suspect. I think obviously the voice I would have brought to it would have been unique, and it certainly would have been exciting. And the reality though is I had to make a tough decision based on the amount of money it would take to close the race in the ensuing three months.
MATTHEWS: Why didn't you go down shooting? Why didn't you just run and even if you risk losing, everybody risks losing, why didn't you?
HACKETT: Well, I have to ask myself what does that achieve in the end, what does it achieve for my party, the Democratic Party, which I me to be successful in November. And I have to ask what it achieves for my staff and for my family personally. And, you know, I didn't see anything positive coming out of that.
MATTHEWS: Did you see yourself losing?
HACKETT: What we found was if we were able to raise the money, we would have been successful in the primary, but that's $3 million.
MATTHEWS: To win the primary?
HACKETT: Yes.
MATTHEWS: Over the general question to win.
HACKETT: Total of $15 million is what I am told.
MATTHEWS: To win?
HACKETT: Yes.
MATTHEWS: And if you hadn't had that money, you wouldn't have been able to win?
HACKETT: No, I wouldn't have been able to get my message out. I would have been responding to somebody else's message, and I didn't relish the idea of being on the receiving end of somebody else's attack without being able to swing back.
MATTHEWS: OK. So you pulled out of the race under pressure from the Democratic leaders.
Say it your way.
HACKETT: Yes, sure. I was encouraged to get into this race, and I answered that call. And I was asked to step aside in this race, and I answered that call too. It doesn't make me happy, but in the final analysis, I pride myself in being a team player. But, you know, there are times when you get asked to sit down and you're not necessarily happy about that.
MATTHEWS: You know, I've watched politics for 30 some years now and I have never heard of a candidate being urged by party leaders to run and then told not to run once they told him to run. What happened here? Tell me the sequence. When did you get to asked to run for the United States Senate?
HACKETT: Shortly after the congressional race. I was called by Senator Schumer. I was called by...
MATTHEWS: Chairman of the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee.
HACKETT: Yes. And I was called by Senator Reid and...
MATTHEWS: The leading Democrat.
HACKETT: Right. Right.
MATTHEWS: And they both said...
HACKETT: They called my wife too.
MATTHEWS: And they said Paul Hackett, run for the Senate in Ohio.
HACKETT: Yes, you know, they actually -- you know what they said is they said your country needs you, and for a guy like me with my military background, you know, that's like waving drugs in front of an addict.
MATTHEWS: Sure. Did both the Democratic leaders that called you, Chuck Schumer of New York, the chairman of the campaign committee, and Harry Reid, the minority leader of the Senate -- did both say they would back you? Did you hear those words?
HACKETT: Yes. Yes, absolutely. Financially and otherwise.
MATTHEWS: And how many months later did you get the notion that they weren't backing you?
HACKETT: Well, it became pretty clear shortly after Sherrod Brown announced that he was getting into the race. The phone calls stopped coming, and at that point, you know, there was...
MATTHEWS: Did you call home and say are you guys still with me?
HACKETT: Yes.
MATTHEWS: And what did they say?
HACKETT: And the response was we're going to be neutral in a primary.
MATTHEWS: So they went from endorsement to neutrality.
HACKETT: They went from endorsement to neutrality to eventually pecking sides, which, you know, that's politics.
MATTHEWS: But why did they do that? You're talking about the leadership of the Democratic Party nationally. Did you have the support of Howard Dean, the chairman of the party?
HACKETT: He was always very supportive.
MATTHEWS: Is he supportive of you now?
HACKETT: In the sense that yes, I mean, he...
MATTHEWS: But did he pull the rug out from under you like the other guys did?
HACKETT: No, my take on it is I don't think he really had the ability to influence the...
MATTHEWS: So he's a figure head?
HACKETT: I didn't say that.
MATTHEWS: Well what is he if he's the chairman of the party and he can't endorse a candidate? What is he?
HACKETT: I think he's a voice of the party. I think he is an important fund-raising element in the party. But I don't necessarily think that he is able to control elected officials.
MATTHEWS: When you look around the country, Major Hackett, do you see any other people on the Democratic side or on the Republican side making an issue of the war in Iraq as a campaign issue for the American people to address this fall?
HACKETT: I think most of the veterans who have come back from Iraq and Afghanistan are making that an issue. At this point, they don't have the same notoriety if you will, or infamy.
MATTHEWS: No it's not -- you had a lot of people out there on the people who don't think this policy is good for America and didn't think so from the beginning, but there are very few clear candidates out there that said, "No, this war has been wrong from the beginning. I didn't vote to authorize the war. I don't think it's good U.S. policy, I'm a patriot. This is not helping our position in the world."
The country, I think, needs a kind of debate like that. I would argue because we didn't have one before we went to war. It's healthy to debate and it's especially necessary to debate war and peace, I think. Do you agree?
HACKETT: Obviously.
MATTHEWS: Well then why did you quit the race?
HACKETT: Three million bucks, $3 million. I mean, that is the ugly reality -- it's the ugly...
MATTHEWS: ... You can't get on the -- in other words, you can't win.
HACKETT: Right.
MATTHEWS: Because the other side can waste you.
HACKETT: Exactly. I mean, to put it in military terms, I can't shape the battlefield.
MATTHEWS: Schwarzkopf's words.
HACKETT: Right.
MATTHEWS: Because the other side can waste you and then you have to spend money to defend your good name.
HACKETT: Right.
MATTHEWS: We'll come back and talk about that. I want you to give us a lesson in civics here, for the people watching on President's Day. It's a good patriotic holiday, and they may have not agree with you on the war. Half the country agrees with you, half doesn't. But I think they ought to hear about how politics works and you ought to give them your benefit -- by the way, you still probably should run for office somewhere. More with Paul Hackett after the break.
And later on in the program, I'll talk to a former CIA intelligence officer who says the Bush administration cherry-picked information to make its case for war in Iraq. You're watching HARDBALL on MSNBC.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
MATTHEWS: Coming up, more with Iraq war veteran Paul Hackett in his first national interview since quitting that Ohio Senate race, when HARDBALL returns.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
MATTHEWS: We're back with Iraq war veteran and former Senate candidate Paul Hackett. Major Hackett, let me ask you about the decision to pull out of this race. You went in with the endorsement of the chairman of the Senate Democratic campaign committee, Charles Schumer of New York. It's his job to recruit candidates like you, he recruited you, right?
HACKETT: Right.
MATTHEWS: And then recruited by Harry Reid, the party leader.
HACKETT: Yes.
MATTHEWS: So you were a recruit going into a new mission, you thought.
HACKETT: Yes.
MATTHEWS: I'm serious, you were called into the mission by the top guys, you wouldn't have done it without their call, right?
HACKETT: Absolutely correct.
MATTHEWS: So you were recruited, you were a volunteer in this army of the Democratic Party against the war? Right? You're smiling, but it's what happened. You're taking this too easy.
HACKETT: Like a good attorney, I'm trying to see where we're going here.
MATTHEWS: Where we're going is why you think they buckled. Did you make too many comments that were hard for them to defend? Was anything you did after the recruitment of you that justified their loss of faith?
HACKETT: Not from my perspective, but I'm sure that my outspokenness on the war issue and many other issues that I believe in made them nervous.
MATTHEWS: Did you call Bush a coke head before or after they endorsed you?
HACKETT: That's a good question. I don't remember. Actually, it was before, but it was -- it was published subsequently, but you know back then -- he hasn't denied it.
MATTHEWS: Don't get into that. I will not do that on this show. I have no evidence the president has ever used coke. He's admitted having an alcohol problem, I used to have one, I admit it. Don't get into this if you can't prove it.
HACKETT: Right, got it.
MATTHEWS: Accept that as a condition?
HACKETT: All right, yes, yes.
MATTHEWS: Three months in the stockade. OK, let's talk about this here. When they told you to get out, because they never answered your calls, what was the final straw you decided, "I cannot wage an anti-war candidacy in a middle of the road state like Ohio, I can't wage one," because I'm curious why we're not really going to see one this year in this country.
HACKETT: Well I don't agree with the premise that -- first of all, that I was waging solely an anti-war campaign. I mean, I was talking about a lot of important issues, not the least of which is the economy.
And I think that the anti-war campaign if you will, can be effective if articulated correctly and accurately. And obviously I think that somebody who had served as I have in Iraq has the ability to have that discussion, and have a little bit of insulation against the Karl Rove attack, which is going to come obviously against all Democrats running in 2006.
I mean, he made no secret of it that he will attack Democrats in 2006 for being unpatriotic, for being weak on defense and national security. I actually think that my service in Iraq insulates me from that because there aren't...
MATTHEWS: ... They weren't going to swift boat you?
HACKETT: Well, with the Republicans, I anticipated the Republicans why going to swift boat me. I didn't anticipate that the Democrats were going to swift boat me and that was the surprise.
MATTHEWS: Who was doing that on the Democratic side?
HACKETT: You know, the word came from many Democratic chairs in the state of Ohio that my primary opponent was spreading rumors about my service in Iraq.
MATTHEWS: What was he saying?
HACKETT: I don't know. He never said them to me, but I would hear back from Democratic chairs that I had...
MATTHEWS: ... What are these photographs they're talking about? What do they have of you doing?
HACKETT: I have no idea. I can only tell you that I served my country honorably.
MATTHEWS: But there's no such thing as photographs out there showing you playing around with parts, human body parts.
HACKETT: Absolutely preposterous.
MATTHEWS: But you've heard these stories.
HACKETT: I have heard those stories and they're absolutely preposterous. I invite anybody who wants to make those allegations to come onto your show. I'll meet them here.
MATTHEWS: Did Sherrod Brown make those accusations?
HACKETT: That's what I'm told by make county chairs.
MATTHEWS: Do you believe it?
HACKETT: It came from...
MATTHEWS: ... Based upon the people you heard it from, do you believe that Sherrod Brown, the likely Democratic nominee for the Senate in Ohio, attacked -- was whispering about an opponent in the -- potential opponent, in fact, at the time, an opponent -- was an Iraq war veteran who was behaving in a dastardly way with a victim of the war?
HACKETT: Do I believe that it came from his campaign? Yes, I do believe it came from his campaign.
MATTHEWS: And you have reason for believing that?
HACKETT: My reason for believing it?
MATTHEWS: Yes.
HACKETT: From the multiple different sources throughout Ohio, all consistently pointing in that direction.
MATTHEWS: Have any of those sources gone on the record with newspapers or T.V. or anywhere?
HACKETT: Some of them have been interviewed by "The New York Times" and some other sources.
MATTHEWS: And they haven't been pick up then, that they haven't been trusted, or what?
HACKETT: I think that they have not specifically said to them what they specifically said to me.
MATTHEWS: Would you swear on a stack of bibles right now that Sherrod Brown has told untrue things about your war service?
HACKETT: Well I would swear that many people have come to me and said that, because that is a fact.
MATTHEWS: Have you ever asked him?
HACKETT: No, I have not spoken to him or anybody on his staff literally in months.
MATTHEWS: Well, when you do, let us know.
HACKETT: I will, indeed.
MATTHEWS: Major Paul Hackett is not running for the Senate -- will you ever run for office again?
HACKETT: Probably not. I want to be a part of politics as you may know, I've joined the IAVA, the Iraq Afghanistan Veterans of America.
MATTHEWS: Are they anti-war?
HACKETT: Yes, in the sense that they want to bring a swift and quick conclusion to the war on Iraq.
MATTHEWS: I'm sorry, Major -- who do we have -- who do you have out there that you have faith in as an anti-war critic, a critic of the war who's running for office this November?
HACKETT: I think all the IVA's. Andy Horn down in Kentucky, there are a number of others around. Eric Massa up in New York. There are a number of candidates around who have served their country in combat and in other conflicts, who have the same belief that I do, that the military was misused in Iraq. And that's really what -- that's what the conclusion is. The military was misused in Iraq by this administration.
MATTHEWS: Thanks for playing out here in Washington and happy President's Day.
HACKETT: We didn't even talk about civics.
MATTHEWS: It wasn't George Washington and Abraham Lincoln but we still know who we're really talking about, those two guys. Thank you, Paul Hackett.


7 Comments:

at 7:27 AM, February 21, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

What a sore loser Hackett is, and a shameless prostitute for media coverage. Is the Enquirer so lazy that all you want to do is post a transcript? We all know how to find this online.Why don't you contact Hackett and get a real soundbyte-and be sure to quote him when he says the F word, which he's so fond of doing.

 
at 7:57 AM, February 21, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Even as a Democrat, I thought Hackett lost all credibility when he accuses Bush of using cocaine with no suporting facts. Matthews made him look like such an amateur.

How can you believe the charges against Brown when he's so fast and loose with the facts.

 
at 7:57 AM, February 21, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Even as a Democrat, I thought Hackett lost all credibility when he accuses Bush of using cocaine with no suporting facts. Matthews made him look like such an amateur.

How can you believe the charges against Brown when he's so fast and loose with the facts.

 
at 7:58 AM, February 21, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Even as a Democrat, I thought Hackett lost all credibility when he accuses Bush of using cocaine with no suporting facts. Matthews made him look like such an amateur.

How can you believe the charges against Brown when he's so fast and loose with the facts.

 
at 8:08 AM, February 21, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Paul Hackett = Crybaby loser

 
at 2:11 PM, February 21, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The truth, you can't handle the truth !

Why doesn't someone ask Bush about hanging with that Southgate MI pioneer ? You'll learn a lot about cocaine swinging with that crowd !

Republican Truth

 
at 4:59 PM, February 21, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hackett is the real deal, and you know it. The coke thing has plenty of support. People have commented that they've done it with Bush and he never will deny doing it. He has, get over it. Maybe he didn't do it long or often but he won't lie and say that he didn't do it.

Is that good or bad? Doesn't matter - he still did it.

I think Hackett was good, judging from the transcript alone. The comments about Brown? Well look closely enough and you will see that Matthews gave him enough chances to get out of charging Brown. Hackett didn't take one; it seems that he is telling the truth.

No matter, it's sad that he was forced to step aside. People will never be happy until we pick our own candidates. When we can do that we might actually see some people that make everyone happy. Believe it or not, they are out there. The Enq will never cover them though.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck