Charter vs. Charter
For the second straight day in the campaign's homestretch, a top Charterite criticized the party's own candidates.
On Friday, the Enquirer published an op-ed column by Charter Committee President Michael Goldman, explaining the third party's support of Issue 22, the 9.95 mill property tax levy to support Cincinnati Public Schools. In it, he calls the school board's financial oversight "not acceptable."
That criticism of "the board" isn't meant to single out any one member, Goldman explained by phone today, but it does include veteran CPS board members Melanie Bates and Rick Williams, he said. Charterites back Bates in her race for City Council and Williams in his re-election attempt at CPS.
The column came just a day after Charterite Chris Bortz, an incumbent City Council candidate, slammed the school board himself.
Here's a few excerpts from Goldman's explanation as why they've endorsed candidates they believe made significant missteps at CPS:
"...We had endorsed Rick Williams twice before, and I think there was a predisposition to stick with him to be loyal. And when he explained his situation and how he read what had happened over the last couple of years, particularly with the last year, with the confusion or whatever you want to call it, the board of Charter had come away feeling Rick had learned something valuable from that experience."
As for Bates?
"We had endorsed Melanie twice for school board, and we believed in the person. There is a predisposition to the be loyal and stick with that person, even if they hit some rough weather, it's not totally of their own making. You want to give that person another chance. In both their cases, it seems very clear that they see what went on, and they're not happy about it either. They both believe the board could have performed better."
While Bates has long been on Charter's list for City Council, Williams was not a unanimous choice in his race. Last month, the party's Issues and Endorsements committee recommended that the party stay out of the CPS board race altogether. But Charter's full board overruled them and decided to give Williams the endorsement for the third straight time.
Williams did not return a phone call seeking comment. Bates said the criticism was only possible because she and Williams helped force the board to face up to its problems rather than hide them.
Tim Kraus, CPS teachers' union president, said Charter's missing the point by endorsing both Williams and the levy. He said even the levy's harshest opponents recognize its recent academic improvements and primarily take issue with the board's performance. The answer to that is to replace Williams, which the union hopes will happen.
"There's a distinction there, and Charter's not making it," Kraus said.
11 Comments:
Thanks for playing catch up. Did you ask Goldman if HIS kids are enrolled in CPS?
One of the biggest mysteries of this campaign cycle is the seeming disappearance of the Melanie Bates for Council campaiign. She started out with strong favorable name ID and had a compelling personal story on top of that. The Enquirer seemed sure to endorse her after two early puff pieces. Then around late August or early September, she seemed to get lost or jump off the tracks. She was poorly prepared for early cadidiate forums.
What in the world happened to this poor woman's campaign?
The CFT opposes Williams because he's talking about changes such as longer school days.
The CFT is funding the Bolton/Flannery/Nelms campaigns because they believe Bolton, as a teacher, will be more sympathetic to teachers. Flannery and Nelms are so clueless they'll follow whatever she says.
Ask why Bolton didn't collect even $1000 requiring her to file a campaign report this period. It's because someone else is footing the bills - the CFT.
Finally, there is a report by a reporter on the Charterite hypocrites.
Chris Bort$ is only out for himself.
I am glad you phrased it as "CPS teachers' union" instead of the CFT...for many years the union has participated in the charade of dressing up the system, instead of being the critic it once was.
There absolutely has been collusion between Sue Taylor of the CFT and Blackwell to make each other look good.
Tim Kraus, although a good guy, continues in the path that Sue Taylor laid out of covering for Blackwell's administration and opposing the elected Board of Ed.
Think about it!
Pa Pa Pa Please !
VOTE, for a real, DEMOCRAT 2007 and LITTLE JEFFRE
Bortz is a member of the Bortz Party until it's time for an endorsement. Otherwise he has not really a Charterite at all. He's a registered Republican. Expedience is all his Charter membership is - the only party that would take him when he decided to run. But his allegiance to other Charter candidates is nil. So him slamming other Charter candidates means very little as an "intra-party squabble."
Someone asked "What in the world happened to this poor woman's campaign?"
Answer: She hired disgraced former Ghiz staffer Scott Gehring
JEERS to Scott Gehring, for (1) getting fired by Ghiz for his poor job performance; (2) wrecking the city council campaign of the Widow Melanie Bates; and (3) being an all-around, class-A jerk.
People have long memories in Cincinnati, Scott, and your antics over the past year will not soon be forgotten. Any hope you ever had of a political career in this town is OVER!
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.
<< Home