Schmidt Q&A on immigration bill
Senate Republicans and the White House announced an agreement on a broad immigration bill last week, which the Senate is poised to consider this week.
The bill is similar to legislation the Senate passed last year, which stalled in the GOP-controlled House: It would give immediate, temporary legal status to most undocumented immigrants, but require them to pay fines, leave and apply from their home countries and wait at least 13 years to become citizens. It also would set up a new program for hundreds of thousands of foreigners to come here temporarily to work.
Finally, the bill would overhaul an immigration system that for years has given preference to relatives of U.S. citizens and permanent residents. Instead, a point system, similar to what is used in Canada, Australia and New Zealand, would be used that would give applicants for green cards credit for education, experience in jobs the U.S. labor market needs, ability to speak English and family ties.
In her weekly column, Rep. Jean Schmidt, R-Miami Township, explained where she stands on this bill.
In her own words...
QUESTION: Does Congresswoman Schmidt support the agreement reached among members of the Senate?
ANSWER: I strongly oppose the compromise being considered by the Senate. I believe the proposal rewards illegal behavior and does not do enough to secure our borders. It is important to note that this debate has just begun. The Senate must complete its consideration of this bill before it is sent to the House of Representatives. More importantly, the House is not bound to consider the Senate’s version of immigration reform. We are free to consider any proposal or none at all.
Q: Does the Senate proposal provide amnesty for illegal aliens?
A: My main problem with this agreement is that, immediately upon enactment, anyone here illegally as of January 1, 2007, will automatically receive a legal work permit – exactly what they broke the law to obtain. To me, that is a form of amnesty. This proposal rewards illegal behavior. The foundation of our nation is the rule of the law, and those who enter our country illegally violate the law. By granting amnesty to illegal aliens, we are sending the message that it is okay to break the law, and encouraging others to do the same. In 1986, the Immigration Reform and Control Act provided amnesty for undocumented aliens already in our country. At that time, we let 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal immigrants become United States citizens. Today we have more than 12 million immigrants living here illegally. The less we control our borders, the more we sacrifice our national security. When millions of law abiding people are following the law and patiently waiting to be granted U.S. citizenship, we simply cannot turn a blind eye to the millions who instead came here illegally and place them at the front of the line.
Q: Are there any components of the Senate proposal that Congresswoman Schmidt supports?
A: I believe that strengthening our borders is the number one priority for our homeland security. I understand the Senate agreement provides important border security and enforcement provisions that I support. The Senate agreement calls for expanding Border Control agents by 18,000; constructing 200 miles of vehicle barriers; and building 370 miles of fencing along the border. It also calls for deploying state-of-the-art technology including 70 ground-based radar and camera towers on the southern border and four unmanned Aerial Vehicles. I believe that we must do more to improve border security and enforcement. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) already has 15,000 Border Control agents and the 370 miles of fencing is less than the 700 miles of fencing that Congress approved last year. However, including these and other border protection initiatives is at least a tacit agreement that we must secure our borders.
Q: What will Congresswoman Schmidt do to address the illegal immigration crisis?
Q: What will Congresswoman Schmidt do to address the illegal immigration crisis?
A: I will vigorously oppose any legislation that grants amnesty to illegal aliens. I have in the past and will continue to support initiatives to strengthen our border security.
For more details on this bill, read THIS STORY from Mike Madden of Gannett News Service.
16 Comments:
Border security first, then deal with the illegals who are already here. The good Congresswoman has the right priorities on a tough question.
it's good to know at least one member of congress gets it.
thank you congresswoman schmidt.
she never answered the last question. every member of congress who opposes this compromise because it is "amnesty" needs to say what they will do to address the 12 to 15 million people already here. if their solution is to round them all up and ship them home, they need come up with a realistic way to do that logisitcally and financially, rather than just spouting rhetoric and talking points. no one has addressed this yet.
"...at 12:07 PM, May 22, 2007 tnp said..."
TNP = The Nazi Party !
just the support the liar needs !
Click those heels and goose-step right through that wRong wingnut whacko, elephant dung schmidt rhetoric !
PATHETIC !
HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2007 !
anon 1:52
actually, its very simple to deal with the ones that are already here. you ready for it????
ENFORCE CURRENT LAWS!
i believe that would solve our issues, yeah? sorry, but i'm kind of opposed to creating new laws until we can enforce new ones. thankfully, congresswoman schmidt does as well.
Congresswoman Schmidt is the only Member of Congress for the real people.
To the person who says they want a realistic way to round up illegal aliens and ship they away, round them up and ship them out is pretty self-explanatory. Do you need to present a plan that shows how you will tie your shoes after you put them on, or do you think you can just tie your laces without further ado? Any cost of rounding them out and shipping these criminals out will be far less than paying out a lifetime's worth of welfare benefits that would result from legalization. Just in the news the other day was that Iran kicked out 70,000 Afghans that were in their country illegally in just one month's time. There is absolutely no excuse for not doing just as much if not significantly more considering our government's capabilities versus that of Iran's.
Here we go again the html impersonator strikes !
We have you caller IP, thanks to that cookie following you around !
Does your family know your visiting that, sandra ali, whistle blower website ?
You need to look deep into your browsers, there is a cookie waiting !
Did you think we were from another planet ?
PATHETIC !
HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2007 !
A Q&A column to Jean Schmidt is an interesting way to hear her views. I hope Politics Extra will do more of these columns, addresssed to both Reps. Schmidt and Chabot. Topics I suggest are:
Their views on Iraq Withdrawal/Funding
The views on Congressional Ethics Legislation
Their views on voting representation in the District of Columbia
Their views on scheduling of election primaries
Their views on raising minimum wage and food stamp allowances
Their views on extending/increasing farm subsidies
Their views on Attorney General Gonzales
Their views on the US prosecutor debacle
Their views on rebuilding New Orleans
And whatever other topics readers wish to know about.
So apparently the Bold Blogger supports giving amnesty to people who broke the law.
Pathetic.
Schmidt is a poll-driven idiot.
There is no need to hire 18,000 border security agents and all that other crap. She simply runs down the list of focus-group tested solutions and tells voters what they want to hear.
The solution is so much simpler: stop granting American citizenship to illegal aliens just because they crawl across the border to have a baby, and enforce the laws already on the books.
If the laws are enforced, the need for border security goes away because there is a significantly reduced incentive to come here in the first place.
As usual, Schmidt proves her ignorance.
Anon 11:17-- identifying and moving 12 to 15 million people is a logistical nightmare. But if that is the solution on which this country settles, there has to be a plan to do that. No one has explained how this will happen. With respect to what happened in Iran, that is irrelevant: Our population is three times larger; Americe is six times a large in area; and we have 12 to 15 million illegal aliens here, 170 times as many as they just dealt with. I agree in principle that since these people broke the law they have no right to stay here, but if we really want to send them home, there needs to be a real conversation about how to do that, something that is missing completely.
Another thing-- no one is talking about the impact sending everyone home will have on the economy. Are Americans really prepared to pay $5 for a head of lettuce?
In response to the person who want s a plan for round-up and deportation, you made half of my case for me when you point out that we have far more illegals in our country than Iran did. We have almost reached a point where a person can't throw a rock and not hit an illegal, but if a plan is what you want how about this one.
The government puts into play all the detention centers that they have created over the years and begin rounding up all of the illegals they can find and putting them in these centers. This to be followed by an orderly processing in which we further identify those illegals guilty of additional crimes against America that owe us either prison time or their lives for execution. We execute all of them that have earned a death sentence, then we put the others in prison to serve their time until their sentences are served after which they are immediately kicked across the border. For the rest that are merely trespassing and stealing jobs and benefits from American citizens are immediately kicked out out of the country after we have taken DNA samples. Should they be found in America again illegally, positive id can be made and they can then be executed because we will not tolerate repeat offenders.
As far as transport goes, we use the railroads as much as possible with cattle cars to transport the illegals to the border. This will provide the most effective and cheapest means to transport the illegals.
We set a goal of cleaning out at least 15 million illegals at which point they might be getting harder to find thereafter. At this point we can switch from mass round ups to attrition by law enforcement. These illegals will have to come out to find either work, food, and/or a place to stay at which time when they do pop up or are encountered by law enforcement they can be immediately arrested and processed in the aforementioned manner.
"...So apparently the Bold Blogger supports ...people who broke the law...."
NO, that would be tnp, the NAZI party, willing to 'nose' behind lying schmidt !
lol, lol, lol
PATHETIC !
HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2007 !
Anon 9:42: How are you going to identify these people? We don't even know who they are. You can't just go ask every person with brown skin for proof they are here illegally-- that would be illegal under the 14th and 5th Amendments. So, how do you find these people?
You are quite wrong when you say we can't go after those with brown skin, it what we like to call a clue in police work. It's the brown skin that helps to easily identify most of these illegals. There is also the matter of speaking little to no English that is a big clue as well as a lack of valid documents that prove American citizenship. You bring up the 14th and 15th Amendments but they have nothing to do with anything here. This is just common sense, we are not being overrun by Western Europeans now are we? If we were to follow the limits you aparently want to set, we can just go ahead and declare the great American experiment as being over now and give up the country since we don't dare offend an illegal alien by having the nerve to ask these pieces of criminal shi* to prove they belong here and not somewhere else.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.
<< Home