The Battle of the Steves?
Rep. Steve Chabot won a seventh term in the U.S. House last fall by fending off a well-financed challenged from Democrat John Cranley, but the Westwood Republican may not be out of the woods yet.
Next year, if he decides to seek an eighth term, Chabot is likely to face a Democratic challenger whose family is well known in the GOP enclaves of Cincinnati's west side suburbs and who has made a career of winning elections in a Republican-leaning Ohio House district - State Rep. Steve Driehaus.
The Price Hill Democrat has already had discussions with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) about taking on Chabot in 2008; and will be in a perfect position to do it - his eight years in the Ohio House under Ohio's term limits law will be ending and Driehaus will have to move on.
Tuesday, he sounded like a candidate.
"By next year, Steve Chabot, with all due respect, will have been there 14 years and people are going to start looking at whether or not it is time for something new,'' Driehaus said.
Driehaus, the minority whip of the Ohio House, said that term limits forces him to "look at other options'' and running for Congress, he said, "ranks right up there at the top of the list."
Last year, Chabot won re-election by about 9,000 votes out of about 202,000 cast in the 1st District, which includes most of the western half of Hamilton County, a small area of Butler County, and most of the city of Cincinnati.
The district is considered to have a 50-50 split between Republican and Democrat voters, based in part on the nearly flat-footed tie between George W. Bush and John Kerry in the 2004 presidential election.
9 Comments:
I love how politicians are always saying "I'm being forced to look at other options." It's as though voters are supposed to accept that the only alternative a politician in one office has when term limited is to find another public office.
Whatever happened to new blood? It's all about shifting seats around no matter if they are Democrats or Republicans.
Why can't we start electing people with real jobs to office, or why can't politicians find real jobs when they are term limited? It's like we have to support them and their lifestyle for the rest of their lives.
And why is he already running for Congress when he just started his term in the legislature? Why can't our politicians focus on their current jobs?
Driehaus wants to look different than Steve Chabot. Maybe taking some time away from politics would be a good start.
Driehaus will take advantage of increased turnout in heavy Dem areas during the Presidential election. He is much more polished and likeable than Cranley, who comes across a a smart-aleck know-it-all on the stump.
Steve Driehaus is the real thing, and Steve Chabot will be driving his 93 Buick around Westwood come January 2009. Chabot's staffers will have to get real jobs for the first time in their adult lives.
Who is Steve Driehaus? Has he ever had a real job?
anon 3:39, you sound very bitter about the last election. Don't think that Driehaus will do any better than Cranley, he's been drinking the DCCC Kool-Aid.
Driehaus is just another career politician looking to stay on the public payroll. And what happens when voters learn he's a pro-section 8 guy?
Can anyone, ANYONE, tell me something that Steve Driehaus has done for this community? He's all talk and no action. Like too many politicians, Driehaus just likes to hear himself talk. Chabot's a sincere guy and voters know it. Buick or no Buick.
Yup. This one is a win for the Dems. When I was driving out to Cranley's HQ I noticed all of the yards with both Chabot and Driehaus signs. It was easy for those voters to turn away from Cranley. Now they are forced to choose.
Here's to ya, Steve! You shoulda ran last year!
...and the Repubs are already trembling...
Count me in for another run by Cranley. If Driehaus wants in, too, then there can be a primary battle.
I just hate it when people applaud "term limits for politicians."
"Term limits" were not a matter of concern for the Founders and Framers of our Constitution. Why? Because we have a built-in 'term limit' --they're called "Elections."
And if you want to argue that "elections" themselves aren't sufficient, then you're just arguing that our Republic simply doesn't work any more. So what's left?
The more professional politicians (those who put their reputations and lives up for continual public scrutiny) are vilified, the more that power is being ceded to the unelected: we call them "bureaucrats," "career civil servants,"
aka, "literati," "mandarins"
We really don't want that. And if you have romantic notions about some kind of 'amateur ideal' in politics, then you're dreaming.
The idea of a "citizen-legislator' is quaint, but it doesn't work in todays real world.
Having met Driehaus and Chabot, I have to say that my initial impression is that Driehaus is classier, more of a free thinker, more balanced, and a FAR superior statesman to Chabot. There is a reason why he is highly regarded by members of both parties in the Ohio legislature. Chabot might be a very nice and genuine person, but he is a lightweight in terms of expertise and competence, while Driehaus seems much more on-the-ball.
There are exceptions to this rule, but in political parties the cream often rises to the top. Driehaus? Minority whip. Chabot? Unbelievably, after all these terms in Congress, he still ranks in the bottom third in terms of influence in Congress.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.
<< Home