*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Supporters of Issue 5 pass statewide smoking ban

Ohio voters soundly rejected Issue 4, a limited ban on smoking in restaurants, bars and other public places, but supported Issue 5, which calls for a complete ban on smoking in workplaces and public places.

"We are so grateful to Ohio voters who saw past the tobacco companies’ smokescreen and voted to create a healthier future for Ohio workers and future generations," said Tracy Sabetta, co-chair of SmokeFreeOhio's campaign.

"Tobacco companies spent millions, but could not defeat thousands of passionate volunteers from across the state who worked countless hours to make this dream a reality," Sabetta said.

The SmokeFree Workplace Act will officially be state law in 30 days. It may take a little longer for the Ohio Department of Health to craft rules to enforce Issue 5.

Ohio is the 15th state to pass stronger smoke-free laws. The list includes: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Montana, Utah, Vermont and Washington State. Several countries have smoke-free laws, including Italy, Ireland, and Scotland.


27 Comments:

at 1:32 AM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nice job Ohio - today smoking , tomorrow fat people. Where does imposing our will on everyone around us stop?

 
at 2:36 AM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bye. Have a good time. Oh, yeah, almost forgot.... join the ill-informed who shot down the gambling issue. How many of our dollars are going to the Indiana boats? Yes, I work at one of the casinos. And every night I come home from work and my spouse complains about the smell and stench of cigarette smoke on my clothing. Look at the bright side. At least YOU can smoke there. I have no choice as that is my employment. Second hand smoke kills.

 
at 7:55 AM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Phil Burress must be salivating today. Knowing that the voters in Ohio are willing to let government take over all their decision making, the legislation of our morals is not far behind. He should have no problem getting the same weak-minded people who voted for Issue 5 to vote for whatever anti-pornography legislation he throws out at the next election.

Congratulations Phil and the rest of Ohio.

 
at 8:36 AM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cry me a river, smoking is an addiction that shows a lack of self control and self respect. Why should your weakness threaten my health? Not to mention increasing my dry cleaning bills because my clothes are caked with smoke everytime I go out to a bar. And for all you people complaining about bars/restaurants, try going to New York sometime. Completely smoke free and completely enjoyable bar/restaurant experience. Plus, do you know how much easier it is to strike up a conversation with someone when you're standing outside having a smoke, than inside the bar where the music is too loud to talk and its so crowded you can't move? I predict people will be a lot happier with all the extra sex they're getting rather than being bummed about this new "inconvenience.

 
at 8:57 AM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Congrats on passing issue 5! Tobacco smoke is a carcinogen, and therefore a health hazard. It should not be allowed in any public place. This is not an issue of "constitutional rights" or "freedom." No one has the right to poison other people.

 
at 9:00 AM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The point is, it's not the government's job to legislate how someone runs their business. Business owners should be free to decide on their own whether or not to allow smoking. Many restaurants in Cincinnati have already gone smoke-free on their own, without Big Brother standing over their shoulder forcing them to do it.

BTW, the gambling issue was a joke too. At least the voters got that one right.

 
at 9:15 AM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Watch out Ohio, next it will be crying babies not allowed in public places.

 
at 9:21 AM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Now that issue 5 passed what about the alcohol that I do not like. Second hand smoke may kill but alcohol kills alot more. I am offended when I have to be around alcohol and have to worry about someone driving drunk or even worse killing people. Also this is just the beginning how many other things will our state start to tell us what we can do and when we can do it. This is really to bad that citizens want this type of life.

 
at 10:12 AM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ummm, Im sorry how about our rights to be able to smoke freely in public. We do live in America right? We do have freedoms, or so we did. I mean cry me a river! People have been smoking for centuries this is not a new development. People who smoke should not be treated like second class citizens, and that is exactly what this ban is making them out to be! The real question is what freedom and right are the government and the lackeys that follow it going to take away from the people! And all the activists out there giving themselves high fives because they got this ridiculous ban passed well I say...GOOD JOB! I can't wait to see all the jobs and money lost from this ban that you all fought so diligently for. Hopefully you voted yes on the minimum wage because there are going to be a lot of people forced to look for other jobs!

 
at 11:39 AM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Everyone that complains that businesses will lose business because smokers can't go there any more are ignoring the non smokers who will now go to those businesses becasue they don't have to deal with smoke any more. I don't go bowling right now because I can't deal with the smoke but you can bet once the ban is in place and it is smoke free I will be there and have more money to spend than the smokers since I am not spending it on cigarettes!!

 
at 12:20 PM, November 08, 2006 Blogger C. W. Henry said...

Wow I am completely suprised that for once backwards hillbilly Ohio has shown that we can be forward thinking and ban smoking in public places as it has been done in California and New York!

I will no longer have to sit in a "Non-Smoking" section of a restaurant that is separated by a chest level partition. (that really stopped the smoke!) I can take my family to a restaurant anywhere in Ohio and not have to wait 30 minutes longer for Non-Smoking on a weekend night because we refuse to sit in the smoking section. I can now go back to a sports bar and not be sick for two days afterwards and feel like I smoked two packs of cigarettes.

I think at first some hardcore smokers will go across the river so that they can continue to smoke and eat or smoke and drink, but the business owners in Ohio will find that the small amount of business they lose to KY will be made up for by people like me that will now frequent their smoke FREE establishments.

I also think that it is interesting that the margin of victory for this vote was almost exactly the same as the poll of smokers vs. non-smokers in the state.

Maybe, just maybe this will entice a few smokers to actually stop this disgusting habit, if not, enjoy the great outdoors, I'll be inside breathing fresh clean air!

 
at 1:06 PM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe, just maybe this will entice a few smokers to actually stop this disgusting habit, if not, enjoy the great outdoors, I'll be inside breathing fresh clean air!

I guess the smokers do win then. They'll be outside getting exercise while you're sitting in your smoke-free restaurant eating your supersized high-calorie food. Pretty soon we'll have to vote for an amendment to the constitution outlawing extra value meals because the non-smokers are now all fatties.

Irony is wicked, don't you think?

 
at 1:40 PM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Those who commented about not having to sit in a non-smoking section anymore must be going to restaurants that do not exist. So many restaurants (and other businesses) were already smoke-free in Cincinnati. Also, the comments about weak-willed people who smoke who now might quit is very offensive. I agree with the others that we are going down a slippery road. Next, we will be voting on whether or not to weigh people before they enter a restaurant. If you are over a certain weight - sorry - you may not enter, and the penance for your 'weakness' is 45 minutes on the Stairmaster.

 
at 2:03 PM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Just keep voting for the government to take care of every human weakness and we'll be voting on absurdities that you can not even imagine. The next Issue will be to weigh everyone before he/she enters a restaurant. If you are overweight - sorry! - you can not enter -and your penance will be 45 min. on a Stairmaster for being 'weak-willed' (as one Blogger here called smokers - very insulting!).

 
at 6:08 PM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Folks, smoking is an addiction -- and since most smokers think that this at most means "psychological" dependency, let me explain how it works.

Nicotine mimics the neurotransmitter acetylcholine. Acetylcholine aids the transmission of all your feel-good chemicals between nerve cells -- dopamine, seritonin -- so taking nicotine boosts transmission of these chemicals. This is the original "high" that hooks smokers.

Unfortunately, over time the body grows desensitized to the abundance of nicotine, and with it acetylcholine, so that smokers begin to need to supplement with nicotine just to feel *normal*. Without it, in their desensitized bodies they experience an acetylcholine deficiency and their feel-good chemicals get artifically choked off; this accounts for the withdrawal symptoms smokers experience: anxiety, irritability, depression. This happens because the body is chemically out of whack.

This is addiction. It's *chemical* dependency, and when a person "needs" a cigarette, they are trying to get back to the place they were before they began to smoke: that is, they're trying to experience again being chemically balanced. In short, nearly all smokers develop into a kind of acetylcholine-diabetic, and they need to medicate with supplements of nicotine -- like a diabetic does with insulin -- merely to feel normal.

This is not freedom; it's behavior that stems out of the need to treat a real disorder. The Tobacco companies have known all of this since the late 1950s; they just neglected to mention it to you. Framing nicotine addiction as an expression of your *freedom* is the big con of the Tobacco Industry.

This trend of instituting smoking bans goes way beyond Ohio; it's worldwide and growing: France, Italy, Scotland, Ireland, UK, the 14 states in the US. Smoking, right or wrong, is now associated with public disease, and because of this, soon the public ashtray will go the way of the public spittoon, which itself disappeared along with the practice of chewing tobacco widely when its public practice began being associated with the spreading of disease.

The winds of change are shifting. Smoking will never again have the "cache" that mid-century advertising and mid-century movies tried to attributed to it. It will only devolve further and further in the public's mind as an increasing repugnant activity.

Then when you add that it kills you with cancer, emphysema and heart disease, that is costs you 2 grand a year, and that it make you smell like crap, maybe you might look at this more positively -- like it's the universe saying, "Wake, the heck, up!"

Or you can retreat to Kentucky and stay in denial. You can lite one of your 7300 cigarettes that you as a pack-a-day smoker will have to smoke this year (year after year), and you can keep telling yourself how "free" you are in the process.

 
at 9:16 PM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This has nothing to do with the technical aspects of addiction, or "smokers' rights". It has everything to do with the fact that government has no place telling private citizens how to run their private businesses. I wish all the anti-smoking blowhards would get that before throwing all these useless statistics in our faces.

 
at 11:03 PM, November 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Two things:

1) Every state that has passed a smoking ban has seen an INCREASE in revenue for restraunts and bars.

2) You have a right to smoke, but it's a choice. A CHOICE.

 
at 10:09 AM, November 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is absolutely insane. This kind of vote is like going to a predominately white neighborhood and voting for a black issue. 26.2% of Ohioans smoke, 73.8% don't smoke. So if every smoker in Ohio voted we still wouldn't have a chance. How can this even be put to a vote, it's completely unfair to us second hand citizens, the minorities, the smokers. Way to go Ohio. I buy my cigarettes in Kentucky, now I have to go out in Kentucky, Why stay here?

 
at 10:23 AM, November 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is absolutely insane. This is like going to a predominately white neighborhood and voting on a black issue or vice versa. 26.2% of Ohioans smoke. If every smoker in Ohio voted there is still no way we could stop this issue. This was a scam from the word go. Let govenment beat up on yet another minority, the smokers. If I could quit today I would, but it's not as easy as all the non smokers think. America gave us the cigarettes, now that we are hooked they want to impose laws that limit us to sitting out in the freezing weather to enjoy our addiction.

 
at 2:19 PM, November 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is wrong unjust etc. etc. Will Ohioians ever get it in their heads that there are people in this state that want to keep their freedoms. You can't win in this State. No Smoking-No Legalize gambling- What next. Going to tell me what TV progams to watch what Church to go to, what car I can drive. Hey, how would the non-smokers like it if we the non-drinkers took their right to drink away? I thought this constitution we have was for all not the majority. Give me my choices rights back. THE COURTS SHOULD OVERRIDE THIS STUPID LAW. I DO BELIVE THIS TO BE ILLEGAL!!!!!!!

 
at 4:28 PM, November 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

By the way one other thing to add
Ohio's nickname is the Buckeye State. I quess our fore fathers had the same problem with a bunch of WORTHLESS NUTs, that have nothing better to do than to make other peoples life difficult. Take it away take it all, one day there will be a law that you NON-SMOKERS will object to because you feel it is stepping on your rights.

 
at 8:43 AM, November 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

You all still don't get it, do you?

Once again, the issue here is that government has no place dictating how someone runs their business. The smoking issue is secondary. Let the individual decide how he or she wants to run his or her business.

Issue 5 is not about denying people the "right" to smoke, or about treating smokers like second-class citizens. It is about giving the government more and more oversight into how we live our daily lives. It is about taking away the freedom of choice. It is about letting the government decide what is and isn't good for us.

You all need to get over your hatred of those who smoke, or your hatred of those who don't. Get over yourselves and see the real issue, and you will realize why passing Issue 5 was a bad idea.

 
at 1:13 PM, November 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

First, the Government does have the right to regulate private business. Does all the time. That is why I do not have to share my dinner with rats and mice, or step on puddles of tobacco juice in malls. Its called a health code. And since smoking violates that code it can be regulated. Thus, no smoking in public places.

Secondly, any ignorant fool who posts about the businesses in Ohio "closing up shop" because of this needs to travel outside their own little trailer park. Smoking bans similar to Ohio's exist in nearly 50% of the states in this Country and encompass about 65% of the population. Last time I checked NYC and Cally were doing just fine in the food and drink industry.

 
at 11:01 PM, November 12, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

the next thing the government is coming after will be your guns, trucks, barbecue grills, private property etc. this is not about smoking and the crafters of issue 5 know it. this is just another perfect example of the united states going down the drain and heading for a socialist metropolis because you have a large segment of voters who want the government to control their lives plain and simple. 60,000 people die every year in cars but no mention of banning cars even though the whacked libs want to ban trucks and suvs. it is becoming scary that everday we wake up there is some new law saving ourselves from each other. krushev was right when he said the soviet union will take america over with a pen. guess what? we are 60% there. you nuts in ohio voted for change alright, more government control of your lives.............

 
at 12:40 AM, November 14, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

For the record I am a smoker, and voted yes on 4 and no on 5. I am not happy with the way the vote turned out. However I do understand it. So I have to go out side a smoke a cig. This will not kill me. My point is out of all the comments that are listed, How many of you voted. If not please keep your oppinions to your self. If you didn't vote, cant complain I say.

 
at 10:34 AM, November 27, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

hey i been a ohio citizen all my life and i think this issue 5 has gone way too far.I can understand not smoking in food places like applebees or mcdonalds,or even fridays but bars? public place like the zoo or even kings island? I personally dont think this is right to smokers non-smokers should think about that because we cant smoke nowhere public thats retarded how about cars? the blow out smoke and now we have no e-check. where does the rights of americans start? it is so stupid. and for those who was not watching the news thats a smoker or non smoker..THE POLICE WILL NOT ENFORCE THIS LAW ONLY THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT...just think you complain 2nd hand is bad for you yes i understand...so is red meat,taking a shower,the sun. they all cause cancer so does this mean we cant eat? cant go outside? its my life i will smoke if i damn well please outside.its my right as a tax payer and u.s citizen to amoke my nicotine if i want i pay for it i will smoke it.

 
at 9:01 AM, November 29, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

All I can say is watch out drinkers! Your next and I personally will be glad of it. This ban passed because you can't profit at a Reds or Bengals game from tobacco. But you can from all the alcohol!! I'm waiting for the next prohibition and then we will see what people say about freedom. Grow up Ohio!

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck