O'Reilly concedes in judge race
From Sherry Coolidge:
At midnight, 1st District Court of Appeals candidate Jim O'Reilly conceded:
"While I respect and accept the voters’ decision, I must express my concern at the loss of diverse viewpoints now that the appeals court becomes 6-0 Republican, and the Supreme Court shifts to 7-0 Republican. The citizens of Hamilton County told us they wanted change, but their votes were roughly the same as the last contested race, in 2002, which also lost by about 60-40. Our campaign reached thousands of Hamilton County residents and found support in dozens of communities. We thank those who worked for change and we hope that future challengers will work as hard and devote as much energy to the needs of the people as our team members have done. We remain convinced that accountability will someday come to our courthouse. "
8 Comments:
Well Jim... I can tell you what is different between 2002 and 2006... that poor sum buck in 2002 didn't blow 250,000 dollars of his own money.
I also find it ironic that your parting shot in Hamilton County politics was also a lie. You didn't reach 40% buddy.
When the county went blue tonight and every other race is to tight to call... you managed to orchestrate a blow out... oh and don't count on an appointment from Strick-daddy when one comes up... you managed to tick of just about every high ranking Dem in the county.
Truly a job well done.
You gotta be kidding! What an arrogant, pompous ass. Now he can crawl back into his hole in the ivory tower of academia.
Oh yea, he may lose his law license too for his outrageous ad that the Supreme Court fined him $5000 for.
It will be interesting to see what the liberals, er, progressives, at the UC Law School will do to him. Probably nothing.
Oh, by the way Professor, you CAN access court records online OR you can go to the courthouse and get them.
As a Republican, I commend the Democrats for their victories in the elections. I have nothing but contempt for arrogant asses like Jim O'Reilly.
Good luck with the Disciplinary Counsel, Jim!
We really need to take partisanship out of the judical system in Ohio.
and the winner is...
The winner out of the O'Reilly camp this season was none other than political advisor Chris Seelbach. Charging roughly $3,500 a month to O'Reilly for his services that equaled to almost a $1,000 dollars per percentage point.
May we all find work like this at some point in our life.
And the winner is... Part II
This award goes to advisor Scott Seidowitz who charged O'Reilly some $25,000 for production of his commercials and I am sure took the normal 15% cut on buying the TV ads from the local companies. Plus, its truly the commercial that keeps on costing because the Supreme Court isn't done with its fine yet.
As a Democrat, I was very interested in this race so I looked at the campaign finances of each candidate. When I saw O'Reilly's report the first thing that came to mind was Paul Newmann and Robert Redford... yes cue the music from "the Sting" because poor O'Reilly paid out the rear for this stuff.
I guess not everyone lost in this race.
Say what you want, his campaign was run more competently than his legal career. What diverse viewpoint was he trying to provide, that of a spoiled two-year-old?
O'Reilly's comments sum it up very well. For him, this entire election was about bringing a Democrat to the Court of Appeals. He did not seem to care about qualifications or experience. He dropped $250,000 of his own money on the hope that he could ride on the coat tails of this Democratic move during this election.
What he seemed to forget throughout this whole process is that while particular judges may be members of certain parties, the role of a judge is non-partisan. Maybe he didn't realize it when he signed up to run, but on the ballot his name did not have a "D" next to it. In the end, as was evidenced last night, the voters will choose the more qualified candidate.
It also didn't help any that the Supreme Court sanctioned him for lying in his TV ads, or that he was exposed as having a history of prejudicing an African American student.
Wow.
How many times is Steve Goodin allowed to post anonymously here?
Also, will there ever be an end to his anger towards Mr. O'Reilly?
Maybe not esp. since it's Mr. Goodin who is n pursuit of Mr. O'Reilly's seat on Council in Wyoming.
You're not fooling anyone here in Wyoming, Steve.
And you're really not fooling anyone in the good ol' Republican Party here either..!
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.
<< Home