*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Monday, October 09, 2006

Schmidt feeling some heat?


This 2nd Congressional District race wasn't supposed to be much of a contest, with an incumbent Republican running against an inexperienced Democrat who wasn't expected to have two nickels to rub together.

Well, maybe not.

You have to wonder whether Jean Schmidt is hearing footsteps, given what has taken place in the past week.

First, 2nd District voters - mostly Democrats and independents - found a flyer from the National Republican Congressional Committee in their mailboxes, one that goes after Democrat Victoria Wulsin on immigration, claming she wants to hand out $50 billion of taxpayers' money to illegals for Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and food stamps.

Then comes the first 30-second TV ad from the Schmidt campaign, one that tries to turn Wulsin into a Warner Brothers cartoon character, with funny "boing" noises every time her head pops up in the picture. The message: She wants to raise your taxes.

Last year, when Schmidt was running in the special election for the 2nd District seat, her TV ad campaigns started out with nice, happy ads of Schmidt on the front porch of her home, telling us she's our buddy and our neighbor. The go-for-the-jugular attack ads came later.

This could mean one of three things:
1. Schmidt's worried.
2. The Schmidt campaign wants to define Wulsin for 2nd District voters before she can define herself (Wulsin's TV campaign is unlikely to start for another week or so).
3. Or both of the above.


42 Comments:

at 9:33 AM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

OK, all you liberals on this blog, start telling us how Wilkinson isn't really a reporter and he is just being a mouthpiece for the GOP.

 
at 10:44 AM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The reason for the attack ads is clear. Schmidt is worried, and she should be. She attacks because she has no defense.
She is stuck to this administrations policies like glue. The Iraq occupation flies to mind. Or, how about the industry written "Mediocre Part D" prescription drug plan, cuts in higher education and tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans while the deficit skyrockets. Decent jobs are flying out of this region because of gov't policies that reward outsourcing. Etc, etc. ad nauseum.
All this is fine with her. Just check her voting record.How can she defend it?
She's trying to define Wulsin because she doesn't dare define herself.

 
at 11:01 AM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I cringe whenever I hear the name Jean Schmidt because I am immediately reminded of her comments about 37 year Marine Corp veteran (retired Colonel) Rep. John Murtha from Pennsylvania when after Murtha introduced his redeployment strategy for Iraq she was quoted as saying "Only cowards cut and run!".

Welcome to Washington D.C. Miss Schmidt...um, please leave NOW!

I sincerely hope Schmidt is feeling the 'heat' of this election cycle. Her constant "pro-Bush" agenda is destroying our state and our country.

 
at 11:37 AM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is Schmidt hearing footsteps? Only if it's a donor approaching with a check.
I can define both candidates succinctly:
Wulsin--steak
Schmidt--weenie (out of code)
You choose!
Incidentally, people who DON'T vote are just apathetic without the 'a'.

 
at 12:13 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Its takes donors with checks to pay for TV and mailings which is why Wulsin ia silent-NO MONEY. Check Act Blue, Wulsin has only raised $67,000. Which includes left over money from the primary. According to the Enquirer, Schmidt raised over $200,000. from the Tony Snow Fundraiser. Add this to all of her other fundraisers and you will be seeing a lot of Wulsin on TV.

 
at 12:34 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

You Dems are having a field day picking over Wilkinson's post, like a gaggle of vultures with a terminal illness. Congresswoman Jean Schmidt will win her contest against the liberal (or "progressive" or whatever you guys are calling yourselves this week) Wulsin, hands down. But the margin of victory will not be what it should or could be for this simple reason: the blind devotion of Christopher Finney's groupies who hate Congresswoman Jean Schmidt because 1) she's a woman, 2) she's not from Hamilton County, 3) she's not Tom Brinkman, 4) they can't defeat her and 5) she will not kowtow to Finney's Fanatics (AKA COAST). She's a tough-minded Conservative who's uninterested in playing your politically-correct BS games. She's run in FOUR election campaigns in the past 20 months. She's won three and is poised to win her fourth. She's a better person than any of her opponents, whether they are Finney/Brinkman sycophants, Dems, libs, progressives, greens, libertarians, socialists, tree-huggers or fools who preach retreat and defeat like that total idiot, John Murtha. So rant on, Dems. You're merely shouting down a rain barrel--and no matter what you say or write, you know it.

 
at 12:39 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Way to cover the horse race Howard. Just watch the commercials and you don't have to get off your ass and check their records or where they stand.

 
at 12:47 PM, October 09, 2006 Blogger natenoy said...

TNP or should I say Schmidt family member, if Jean is "a better person than any of her opponents" why will she NOT DEBATE either of us and prove it to the public?

Nate

 
at 1:13 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nate, According to the League of Women voters you are not entitled to debate. They require a candidate to get at least 5% in an independent poll to be allowed to debate. Nate, you split 1% with another write in. I think that means you have 1/2 of 1%. Now go ask Chris Finney and Tom Brinkman what you should do next.

 
at 1:58 PM, October 09, 2006 Blogger natenoy said...

The Survey USA Poll is hardly reliable. Our internal polls show us in double digits.

Nate

 
at 2:00 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey TNP-- Nice rant!
If you're still upset, one more dose of Ex-lax ought to do it.

 
at 2:33 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This post is directed solely to TNP:

TNP said: "Dems, libs, progressives, greens, libertarians, socialists, tree-huggers or fools who preach retreat and defeat like that total idiot, John Murtha. So rant on, Dems. You're merely shouting down a rain barrel--and no matter what you say or write, you know it."

So I'm assuming by your "courageous" stance on the war in Iraq you are in fact writing your post from within the Green Zone in Baghdad, Iraq right now? NO??? You're not on the frontlines fighting this war for petroleum, Bechtel/Halliburton and american global hegemony? What's that? Neither are any of your children? But Fox News says things are going great in Iraq? And I'll bet you are driving around with yellow ribbons on your car huh?


REMINDER as of 10/9/06:

U.S. MILITARY DEATHS IN IRAQ: 2743
U.S. MILITARY WOUNDED IN IRAQ: 20468

 
at 2:35 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nate, I really, really want someone, anyone, to knock off Jean Schmidt and send her lying a** back to her farm in Clermont County. But there is no way a write-in candidate is going to get double-digit votes, let alone a double-digit percentage.

 
at 2:36 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

anNoy: "Our internal polls"?

Your family is obligated to support you because they want you out of their basement, and chris finney left you high and dry, looking like a fool. Next time, use "My".

thanks.

 
at 2:43 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are you kidding Wilkinson? how on earth do you think she's scared of wulsin?

 
at 2:48 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nate,
You and your dad are two but that isn't double digit. The League of Women Voters says "independent" not internal. I don't think you even showed up as a fly spec on Vic's poll. Or did she phony up the numbers and take your 1/2% when no one was looking. Maybe you need to audit her numbers, it looks like she screwed you.

 
at 2:56 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nate is right, Survey USA polls are bogus. I'm not saying that Survey USA uses push polling (actually I am), but their company doesn't even have a phone number. It seems like most legitimate companies have a phone number. Anyone experienced in politics knows that the only two credible polls are Zogby and Gallup. Anything else is bought and paid for.

Anon at 11:37, "a donor approaching with a check," are you serious? Jean has been out-earned in every election since she lost to Tom Niehaus. She has donated hundreds of thousands to her own campaigns over the last few years. (Less than a mil but more than 550K) But that's chump change for someone who owns 1/2 of Clermont County. (And no, that's not necessarily a bad thing) Every election year, Jean's favorite charity is herself.

My prediction for the race: All real Republicans will vote for Nate Noy; democrats will vote for Wulsin; and all the Corrupt Clermont Cronies will vote for the most incompetent and embarrassing politician in Ohio history. More embarrassing than Buzz Lukens, more than Jerry Springer and more than Dick Celeste.

Good luck Nate. Vicki, if you were pro-life, you would be beating Jean by 20 points. Smarten up!

 
at 3:29 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Really folks, you should take it easy on Nate Foy. At least he's got the guts to take a position, unlike Jean "I know nothing" Schmidt.She won't even take a position on Mark Foley. Wonder why that is?
She's hoping that her silence on this issue is as golden as all the PAC money she's taken from :
Hastert 20K
Boehner 20K
Reynolds 10K (the guy who convinced
Foley to run again )
Price 15K (also under investigation

Do you think for one minute that she would even express some outrage and risk derailing her money train?
Not a chance.

 
at 3:37 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Where's Rantin' Ray and his sign when we need him?

 
at 4:02 PM, October 09, 2006 Blogger natenoy said...

Talk to the people that heard me on Cunningham last Monday.

Talk to the people in Adams County where the debate between Vic and I was played on the radio and where I hit the front page of the paper.

Talk to the people in the Mason Christian Village where I spoke last week.

Talk to the people in my home county of Pike.

Talk to ANY REAL REPUBLICAN!

Talk to the members of the Reform Party and America First Party in the district.

Wait there is more to come, like my upcoming radio interviews. My interviews with Channels 9,12 and 19. The November 4 Candidates forum in Hamilton County.

And the mother of all: November 1, Bethel, Ohio. Jean Schmidt, Vic Wulsin, and Nate Noy; ONE TIME ONLY will actually appear in the same forum. Call Melvin Dean to confirm (he's the ONE and ONLY ONE that was able to secure Bob and Jean in April.)

Did I mention that I'm gaining traction? Almost forgot, there are more Jean Schmidt bombshells to come, I'm just waiting for the right time.

Nate

 
at 7:10 PM, October 09, 2006 Blogger natenoy said...

Term limits an immediate Yes. It would drastically reduce corruption.

I actually researched the Fair Tax earlier in the year. On its face it's a hard sell, however it makes a ton of sense. I would support it if and only if all other forms of taxes were eliminated per the plan I read. With the refunds proposed under the bill it would actually LOWER taxes for most if not all Americans.

It also would act as a tariff on imports and help balance trade. Everyone should take a look at: http://www.fairtax.org/pdfs/nonpartisan_definition.pdf

If you read through the entire document it makes a lot of sense from an economic standpoint.

So, yes I would support it.

Nate

 
at 7:21 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nate go ahead and drop your bomb-shell. No one is listening anymore, you have lost all credibility.

Howard might be right about Jean being worried that Dr. Death or Dr. Wells or Dr. Wulsin is going to go on TV soon. But the real question is will Victoria have enough money?????? One good television buy costs 75 thousand thats probably all she has in the bank. One week won't win her the election.

 
at 9:53 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

When the FEC reports are filed on 10-15-06 we will see good old Nate with his pants down. I doubt if there will be much to see. I am sure the Enquirer will be holding the presses for this one.

 
at 10:46 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

All real wRong wingnuts should vote for Nat AnNoy !

The thinkers, Dem's and Non's should vote Wulsin !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2006 !

 
at 11:07 PM, October 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Anonymous at 2:33pm, 10/9--
I did my fighting against commies in Vietnam while retreat and defeat "elites" like you stabbed us in the back yelling "Hell, no, we won't go," as you violated federal law by burning your draft card. This war will be won by people like me so that people like you can continue to spout nonsense on blogs like this one.

I-71 Commuter, you are a serious candidate for the funny farm if you truly think for one minute that the hapless Nathan Noy is a real candidate for the Second District race. He's a half-bubble off plumb, and the only people who will vote for him will be Finney's Fanatics (AKA COAST) and Brinkman groupies. C'mon, you were just kidding, right?

Nathan Noy, why should Congresswoman Jean Schmidt stoop to debate you when all you've done in this campaign is create one trivial dust-up after another costing her time and money to defend herself against your specious nonsense? If I were her, I'd tell you to take a long walk off a short pier. Give it up, Nathan. Even if your campaign were to be "gaining traction," that's about as significant as a Tonka Toy race car picking up speed in a NASCAR race. Get real, and get gone.

And while I'm at it, Anonymous at 2pm, 10/9, I'm a regular person, unlike you irregular types who espouse the pro-abortion, pro-homosexual mantra, cut and run, unrestricted immigration, big govt, anti-military and high taxes line of tired old liberalism. You folks are the ones in dire need of fiber in your diet. You along with that poor, misguided Nathan Noy.

 
at 12:13 AM, October 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Victoria Wulsin is a horrible candidatew with or without attack ads.

 
at 12:31 AM, October 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Of course Mean Jean isn't worried about losing. That's why she's running negative ads 1 month before the election.

Get serious Team Mean. If a candidate is up by 20 points in the polls they're not goint to acknowledge the existance of their opponent. Mean Jean is about the only Republican who can lose this district. If we'd nominate any decent Republican we wouldn't have to worry about losing OH-2.

 
at 10:37 AM, October 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lets see, wasn't it Paul Hackett who called Dems’ most experienced/prominent military affairs member of the House "irresponsible and stupid". Hackett even said that Murtha "continues to foam at the mouth" On WLW700, Paul Hackett said that Murtha needed to get back on his meds.

 
at 10:59 AM, October 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jeff, I'm so very sorry Congresswoman Jean Schmidt has been mean to you. Why don't you race home tearfully, leap into bed, assume the pre-natal position and turn the electric blanket up to 9? You must not be "cincyjeff."
He's a twit, too, but at least he can spell.

Bilchuk, Congresswoman Jean Schmidt might well have chosen a few different ways of expressing herself in her maiden House floor speech, but the essense of her emotional remarks captured the feelings of a majority of her Second District constituents. And since her diatribe, she's gotten campaign contributions from individuals all over the country who loved what she said and how she said it. She's a tough cookie; she has to be to participate in all the 26.2-mile marathons she runs in each year. She also has to be to put up with the BS tossed at her by her detractors, like you.
But she can handle you and 10,000 just like you. As I've said before, the Bedouin saying applies, "The dogs bark, and the caravan moves on."

And while I'm at it, the Democrat "cut and run" idea would be a disaster, even if you folks do euphemistically call it "redeployment." You still don't get it; freedom is NOT free.
War is ugly, awful, degrading and destructive, no two ways about it. But unfortunately there are things in life that are much, much worse, such as loss of freedom, starvation, tyranny, oppression, living in constant fear, etc. Whether you believe it or not, we MUST kill people and break things OVER THERE so we don't face those same thugs and murderers here in our homeland. We saw what they want to do here on 9/11, and we didn't like it much. And for once, we have a Commander-in-Chief willing to take the war to the enemy wherever we find him instead of passively talking while we wait for him to hit us again and kill more of our people. You Dems don't seem to be able to grasp that. You can't seem to get past the death and injury to our troops. As awful as that is, it's part of the price we have to pay to protect our nation from our Islamic Fascist enemies. No matter what you say, we didn't ask for this war, but will sure as hell finish it in the years to come with your help or without it. Our success is absolutely necessary for your continued freedom to write the nonsense you so fervently spout.

 
at 11:18 AM, October 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Usefullidiot, except for your supposed allegiance to Nathan Noy, you and I are on the same page. I fully support the elimination of the income tax, the alternative minimum tax, the excise tax, the estate tax and the gift tax and their replacement by the FairTax, the legislation for which has been pending before the House for some time now. Just think what life could be like without the IRS. And the whole premise of the FairTax is based on revenue neutrality, i.e., the central govt would continue to glean the same amount of tax revenue it currently does. There are many, many other advantages to the FairTax, and I urge everyone reading this comment to read about it. Just Google "FairTax," get the website address (I think it's www.fairtax.org) and read about it.
It's time is coming, and all of us who want the IRS to be a nightmare of the past should get behind the FairTax. And thanks for bringing it up, Usefullidiot.

BTW, your blog handle doesn't do you justice.
Vladimir Ilyich Ulianov (AKA Nikolai Lenin) would not think you were one of the "useful idiots" that the Bolsheviks found so compliant and handy. You're much too smart to be a damned liberal fruitcake.

 
at 1:52 PM, October 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jean Schmidt is not the "ONLY" Republican who will lose the 2nd District of Ohio in future years. The District is changing. I know, I've spoken to thousands of Republicans from Waverly and Protsmouth all the way to Cincinnati.

A Friend of the People who live in Southern Ohio

 
at 2:39 PM, October 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey TNP,
Get with the program; it wasn't Jean's maiden House Floor speech when she criticized Murtha. In her first term she gave more floor speeches than Rob Portman did during his first 3 1/2 years in office. Jean loves the spotlight, in the only way a conceited lifelong politician can.

Jean was born into wealth and, except for being a lifelong politician, has never worked a day in her life. (Although she was a teller at her father's bank and an aerobics instructor.) With real-world qualifications like that, how could anyone doubt her working-class credibility?

(She may have earned a teaching certificate, but has never worked as a teacher. She was president of the right to life for 70 days.)

Rob Portman's resume before politics:
BA Dartmouth; JD Michigan; White House legal Council; Patton Boggs LLP; Graydon Head LLP.

Jean Schmidt's resume before politics:
Aerobics instructor; bank teller.

You decide if we have taken a huge step down.

 
at 7:11 PM, October 10, 2006 Blogger thirstycoon said...

Note, please stop trying to run your campaign through the blog. You summed up your character by threatening another "bomb."

 
at 7:17 PM, October 10, 2006 Blogger thirstycoon said...

Sorry, Nate. I didn't purposely spell your name wrong. It was a mistake, like claiming Jean didn't run the Columbus marathon. I apologize. Did you?

 
at 8:45 PM, October 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Crk said…It was a mistake, like claiming Jean didn't run the Columbus marathon. I apologize. Did you?

Jean does seem to be running a lot these days: running marathons, running her mouth on the house floor, running negative ads, even running from debating the “DOC”. Come on, we all know that Mean Jean is a coward, as she hides behind jokers like you

 
at 9:15 PM, October 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I-71 Commuter, my guess is that you have never made the same criticism of your man, Clinton, who REALLY has never held a real job, never paid a house payment, never bought a car, never put a kid thru college, never met a payroll, never managed a household or a business bottom line and perhaps has never let a single year of his married life go by without at least one episode of infidelity. I'm sick and bloody tired of the so-called Ivy League "elites" trying to run my life, because they are convinced they know how better than I do. Congresswoman Jean Schmidt is a life-long resident of the Second District. She lives in the suburbs, grew up on a farm and has business interests in various urban areas. All these aspects of her life play well in the Second District because of the varied nature of the 7 counties represented in whole or in part in the District, from urban and suburban eastern Hamilton and western Clermont to the small towns and rural areas of Pike and Scioto. Congresswoman Jean Schmidt knows the District, and she brings her own unique strengths to the tasks she faces as our Congressional Rep. And she's not a damned lawyer. I'm also sick and bloody tired of being represented by attorneys. I'm very glad Congresswoman Jean Schmidt has had the courage and stamina to run in four election campaigns in the past 20 months. I don't know of many men who could or would have done the same thing.
And I sure as hell don't think she is a "step down" from Rob Portman. A step in a different direction with a motivated, intelligent woman with her own special talents, yes. But "down"? Absolutely not, regardless of anything you or nutty Nathan Noy or Finney's Fanatics (AKA COAST) or Brinkman's groupies or any of the damned Democrats might say.

 
at 9:35 PM, October 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cincy911truth, you can't deny that you are one of the cut and run crowd. It's difficult for me to believe that folks like you refuse to understand that we have been dragged into a global war. I'm very thankful that President Bush has the common sense to fight it overseas instead of allowing the thugs and murderers to bring it to us again. Phase I was Afghanistan. Phase II is Iraq. Wait till you see Phase III; it'll knock your socks off. And of course, you are probably one of those well-intentioned fools who, like Ned Lamont in Connecticut, want to "talk" to our enemies. Frankly, I'm so sick of hearing the standard liberal parallel universe BS about "Bush lied and people died." We've been over and over this trail, and you've been proven wrong time and time again. Yet you persist in mouthing the same old empty claims. Perhaps you are so young that life hasn't knocked you down and stepped in your face enough. You may be one of those folks who don't yet know enough to know how little you know about the way this mean old world works. But that's okay. Sit back and enjoy yourself while our troops and sailors and airmen and women defend us in the middle east and around the world. Maybe one of these days you'll come to realize just how precious your freedom is and just how far we all need to go to defend it. I believe Congresswoman Jean Schmidt knows and will vote accordingly in DC. That's one of a large number of reasons why I support her and why she'll win this election just as she has the past three she's run in, your opposition and bad wishes notwithstanding.

 
at 9:40 PM, October 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous at 8:45pm, 10/10, you sound suspiciously like another knucklehead who pops up in these blogs now and then, badmouthing Congresswoman Jean Schmidt and whimpering about her being "mean."
You complain about a woman being "mean" and then call HER a coward. That's laughable. I'm so sorry Jean has been mean to you. I'll speak to her about that and ask her to treat you with the kindness and gentleness a sensitive creature like you deserves.

 
at 7:40 AM, October 11, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

TNP said... I'll speak to her about that and ask her to treat you with the kindness and gentleness a sensitive creature like you deserves.

When you speak to her, please let her know that I need her help….I would like to have one of those FAKE DEGREES that she brags about having. By the way, did you receive your degree from “MEAN JEAN UNIVERSITY”?
As for you, I feel sorry for people like you. You think the only people you can hide behind are liars and thieves. My suggestions would be for you to get out of Clermont County more.

 
at 10:46 AM, October 11, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why do Democrats think that Republicans think it is bad to take money from Dennis Hastert, John Boehner, and Debby Pryce when Republicans love those three individuals. Boehner is going to win in a walk and is 20 miles away, why do you think this message is resonating?

 
at 6:06 PM, October 11, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Usefullidiot :
You are an idiot and you are not usefull. Having a represtative that lies about having a college degree is a big deal! The fact that she doesn't have a degree, isn't the concern. But what matters is that she lied to voters about her credentials. Then, only to make matters worse, she lies about it again. In a vain effort to coverup her deception.
The woman cannot be trusted and has shown it repeatedly.

Jean said that she actually earned it, but never picked up the degree. Give me a break! First of all, anyone who has graduated college knows that the hours earned is what counts, not the paper certificate. After she said this, it was determined that she was a year and a half short of ever completing a degree. A year and a half!

Jean lied to the public about her credentials. The same credentials which voters used to measure her agaist other (more qualified and honest) candidates.

I'm no Democrat, but at least Vicki Wulsin earned her degrees and they're not "still waiting to be picked up."

 
at 1:08 AM, October 13, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This post is about gone. But I gotta chime in again, even tho these issues have long since been hashed out thoroughly.

Before we invaded Iraq, every single intel operation in the world, including Israel's Mossad, Russian, EU and UN intelligence and our own Clinton-corrupted and -weakened CIA agreed that Saddam Hussein had WMD. Even Bill Clinton said so. So did Al Gore.

With that intel plus Saddam's track record of using WMD against Iran and even against his own people in the Kurdish areas of Iraq, plus Iraq's obvious provision of safe haven for terrorists (e.g. Zarqawi's hospitalization in Baghdad), plus maintenance of terrorist training camps (remember the 727 fuselage in northern Iraq used to train airliner hijackers?), plus Saddam's threats against Israel and Saudi Arabia, plus Saddam's rebuilding of his military using "Food for Oil" money from the corrupt UN, all this coupled with his war with Iran, his invasion of Kuwait, the wanton sabotage of Kuwaiti and Iraqi oil wells and the tossing of the IAEA inspectors led our President to order the invasion of Iraq to carry out regime change. Bush did what he should have based on the best intel available at the time.

The establishment of a viable democratic republic in Iraq and in Afghanistan would put democracies on each side of Iran. With Turkey to the north, Iran would be hemmed in by democracies. That's important because there is a growing democratic revolution brewing on Iran's college campuses and among Iran's labor organizations that could possibly be enabled and strengthened enough to toss the Ahmadinejads and the ayatollahs out of power. Iran is currently the world center for terror support and training. Regime change will happen in that country. It would be much, much better if that regime were to be changed from within by the Iranians
themselves.

The Bush Administration is taking the war against the Islamic Jihadists to them in their own territories, in their own homes, in their sanctuaries. And we are hostile toward Syria, Iran, Sudan and the other terrorist sympathizing states, because this is a global war to the death. We must do whatever we have to, knowing it isn't and will never be easy. JFK said we had to be willing to pay any price to defeat our communist enemies in the 60's and 70's. We must now be willing to go the same distance to eliminate the global threat posed by these latest enemies, the Islamic Fascists. As a Vietnam war veteran, I know up close and personal how ugly, degrading and costly war always is. But loss of freedom is much, much worse. And those of us who realize just how much danger our nation is in right now, must persist in the prosecution of this nasty, costly conflict despite the opposition of pacifists, leftists, America-haters, cut and run retreat and defeat elites, cowards and lala land parallel universe ("can't we just talk to them?") liberals and "secular progressives." We can't negotiate with terrorists. Neville Chamberlain, the liberal, "secular progressive" of the 1930's, tried to talk Adolf Hitler out of his aggression and failed utterly. So far our diplomatic efforts against Kim Jong-il, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Zawahiri, OBL and even Hugo Chavez have failed to deter any of them from their headlong pursuit of terror and serious troublemaking. Eventually with each of these hate-filled kingpins, the fertilizer will strike the revolving blades, and we'll be back in the business of killing people and breaking things. It's very sad, but, gang, that's the kind of world we live in, like it or not, accept it or not.

Has the President and his administration done everything right? Of course not! But despite our criticism, do we owe our government and our voluntary military our support and encouragement? You bet! To do otherwise, to nitpick, obstruct, delay, oppose, cry unconstitutional at every twist and turn, even to call our troops the equivalent of Nazis (as Durbin did) is to give aid and comfort to the dedicated thugs and murderers who want to kill you and me and our families. We must win the victory. And I don't give a damn who thinks otherwise. If those who hate Bush and Condoleezza and Rummy and Dick have their way, we'll wake up some morning and find one or two of our cities or ports have been turned into a sea of radioactive glass. May the Lord God prevent it! Vote for victory on November 7th!

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck