*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Friday, September 08, 2006

Wulsin reacts to Elections dismissal

The Ohio Elections Commission ruled in favor of U.S. Rep. Jean Schmidt Thursday, unanimously dismissing a false statement complaint filed by write-in congressional candidate Nathan J. Noy.

Dr. Victoria Wulsin, the Democratic candidate for Ohio's 2nd Congressional District, offered this reaction:

"Regardless of this frivolous claim, Jean Schmidt has a long track
record of dishonesty. Americans have had enough of her lies and enough
of the corruption. It’s time to put people ahead of politics and Ohio’s
families first. It’s time for a change."


34 Comments:

at 2:48 PM, September 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

What a cheap shot. It just shows what an amateur Dr. Wulsin is. I'm no fan of Schmidt's, but this makes Wulsin seem petty and vindictive. Not ready for the big leagues.

 
at 3:15 PM, September 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

whos victoria wulsin?

 
at 3:49 PM, September 08, 2006 Blogger Nasty, Brutish & Short said...

And now Victoria sounds as nutty as Nate. What histrionics!

 
at 4:37 PM, September 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's time Vic to realize her Pro-Choice, Pro-Gay, Raise Taxes and her crazy gasoline tax is not what Ohio's Second District wants. She needs to open her eyes to the other 499,975 people in the Second District and realize their values and their beliefs do not fall very closely with hers.

 
at 5:31 PM, September 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jean does seem to lie a lot.

 
at 6:05 PM, September 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

With Mean Jean's 2 convictions at the hands of the OEC, Mean Jean's supporters have no room to talk about anyone.

 
at 6:43 PM, September 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually Nate Noy is Vic's only patient.

 
at 8:26 PM, September 08, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am not a democrat. However, come on people, Vic is speaking the truth about Jean. Have you been living under a rock for the last year? Do you recall the false endorsements and the fake degree? You need to give Vic credit on this one, as she is speaking the truth. Sometimes the truth hurts, so suck it up and move on.

 
at 11:03 AM, September 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dr. Malaria just needs to get over her lack of media coverage. Nate Noy has gotten more coverage then her....

 
at 1:43 PM, September 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Clearly that's not David Pepper beacuse if it was he'd know that Jean's in his corner. He's the Heimlich Remover and anyone in Schmidt's camp is just fine with that. Knowing the poor job Phil has done for this city, along with his chronies Finney, Brinkman, and Beischel. Goodbye Phil, goodbye Hamilton County corruption, even if it does take a Dem to do it. Go Pepper and Go Jean!

 
at 2:41 PM, September 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know Vic Wulsin and she is a decent and honorable person. I will be proud to cast my vote for her on election day. And nobody has ever called me a liberal. Jean Schmidt embarrassed us. She needs to go.

Wulsin for Congress

 
at 4:49 PM, September 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is TNP writing.

Jean Schmidt was not "convicted" of anything. To say she was is misleading. She was reprimanded for two errors (that admittedly should never have occurred), one involving the confusion of UC coursework that resulted in an Ohio teaching certificate instead of a second BA as erroneously reported on her campaign website and the second about the posting of political endorsements on her website before her campaign had actually received confirmation of those endorsements from the named individuals, who as it turned out, had merely stated they would "support" her candidacy but not officially "endorse" her. Errors?, yes. Reprimands?, yes. Lies?, no way. "Convictions"?, absolutely not. And the only folks who persist in calling her a liar and egregiously and repeatedly misstating the OEC findings are 1) Democrats, who specialize in obfuscation and confusion and 2) the dedicated twits who call themselves "the true Conservatives," but who are widely and accurately known as COAST devotees and Brinkman groupies. Neither #1 or #2 can beat Jean in an election, so they stand off on the sidelines and sling mud and create as many distractions as they can. But the old Bedouin saying still applies:
"The dogs bark and the caravan moves on."

 
at 10:11 PM, September 09, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Vickie, Anyone can twist words around to give them completely different meanings. How about speaking out about something that really matters!!! We know 100 percent where Jean stands. Against abortion, pro individual rights, pro second ammendment, pro families, against unjust and excessive taxes!!!
Talk about something that someone cares about!!!

 
at 4:08 PM, September 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"The dogs bark and the caravan moves on."

LIAR, LIAR PANTS ON FIRE !!

mean jean is a habitual LIAR and even the wRong wingnut publication whistleblower reports her to be (TLB) a LIAR !

She LIED on the floor of congress !!

She was found guilty of multiple LIES !

ONCE A LIAR, ALWAYS A LIAR, PERIOD !!

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2006 !

 
at 5:24 PM, September 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wulsin is doing everything she can to avoid discussing her pro abortion and pro gay marriage position. Friday night at a Clermont County event she was asked about her abortion position and she totally talked around the issue and left. Wait until the gun owners find out about her gun control stance. And with Wulsin gun control doesn't mean hitting the target.

 
at 9:32 PM, September 10, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Common Sense and TNP Writing.

The fact is she lied, more than once. In addition, when you listed all the things Jean stands for, you forget to list "Earning FAKE DEGREES". One more thing, you must have been joking when you stated she is against excessive taxes. Please do not start lying for Jean. It will come back and bite you, just ask your friend Jean.

Talk about something that someone cares about!

 
at 9:16 AM, September 11, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

VOTE DEMOCRATIC 2006!

They're not liars? Slick Willy? Didn't he lie as President, under oath? Do you really think we're all that ignorant? The fact of the matter is, Jean's views fall along line with ours, there are some things more important than a couple of mistakes on a campaign website. One of those is the sancitity of life, the sanctity of marriage, having more money for us to spend in our pocket, and being able to protect ourselves when we want. Four thing Victoria Wulsin would not agree with. LIBERAL, LIBERAL, LIBERAL!!

 
at 9:26 AM, September 11, 2006 Blogger Whiskey Tango Foxtrot said...

WTF has learned that Vicki told a group of firearms instructors and Deputy Sheriffs that she thought that guns should be banned. I guess Vicki knows best, just like she knew best when she injected Malaria into the unsuspecting poor in Africa.

 
at 11:28 AM, September 11, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have heard this as well, Vic needs to be brought up on the issues! I'm almost starting to think maybe Jean should have debated her to bring out her record. Oh well it will all be on live TV in late October.

If you cast your vote for Vic, you're casting it for an u(L)tra LIBERAL whackjob!!!!

LIBERAL!! LIBERAL!! LIBERAL!!

 
at 11:58 AM, September 11, 2006 Blogger natenoy said...

Tonight 7:30pm Ohio Valley Communications Tech Center on route 125 just west of West Union. I’ll be there along with Vic (Jean will be a no-show). Make the trip east if you want to hear us talk about the issues.

Nate

 
at 12:53 PM, September 11, 2006 Blogger Whiskey Tango Foxtrot said...

Correction! WTF did make a mistake a few posts ago. She did not say that she wanted to ban all guns. She said that she fully supported the 2nd Amendment, but thought that certain guns should be banned, the "ones the NRA likes". WTF still has absolutely no idea what that is supposed to mean. WTF does point out that the good Doctor would not then, support the 2nd Amendment.

Either way, we now know that Vicki Wulsin is a gun banner. The question remains...who's guns would she want to ban? Yours?

 
at 12:57 PM, September 11, 2006 Blogger Whiskey Tango Foxtrot said...

Correction! WTF did make a mistake a few posts ago. She did not say that she wanted to ban all guns. She said that she fully supported the 2nd Amendment, but thought that certain guns should be banned, the "ones the NRA likes". WTF still has absolutely no idea what that is supposed to mean. WTF does point out that the good Doctor would not then, support the 2nd Amendment.

Either way, we now know that Vicki Wulsin is a gun banner. The question remains...who's guns would she want to ban? Yours?

 
at 2:21 PM, September 11, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Either way, we now know that Vicki Wulsin is a gun banner. The question remains...who's guns would she want to ban? Yours?

Certainly we need to get guns out of the hands of wRong wingnut wackos before they mislead us into another war that kills our children.

You see (WTF) wants all babies to be born, so, they can die protecting the weath of the top 1% in our nation and their oil interest !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2006 !

 
at 3:25 PM, September 11, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Does that sound like the ideas of someone you want representing, you the LIBERAL!! author in bold italic print??!!?!? OF COURSE NOT!!! He's a LIBERAL!! LIBERAL!! LIBERAL!! And he'll take your money!! Tax tax tax, and ban ban ban. LIBERAL!!! LIBERAL!!! LIBERAL!!! Don't vote Wulsin!! She's as bad as they get!!

 
at 5:27 PM, September 11, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tax, tax, tax and LIBERAL, LIBERAL, LIBERAL?

Is that all you have are talking points?

Did you know that the war in Iraq is costing the US Treasury 200,000,000 dollars a day and that this is deficit spending? Who is going to pay for this? Your grandchildren

Anyone who tells you they can cut taxes while increasing spending on an unnecessary war of choice the majority of foreign policy experts agree has made the US less safe not more is not someone who should be trusted with the nations finances.

 
at 7:22 PM, September 11, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

He's a LIBERAL!! LIBERAL!! LIBERAL!!

Another wRong wingnut whacko that believes if speak the same LIE over and over again maybe the voters will begin to buy it.

Sorry, we once were blind, but, now we see !

You see, the public has decided to "cut and run" from your schmidt !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2006 !

 
at 8:21 AM, September 12, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jean continues to embarrass this district. Would Rob Portman have ever been dragged up to Columbus for some election violation? No, because he had respect for this district and the voters. Jean has lied to the citizens of this district and continues to lie. She is clearly not worthy of our trust. As if lying about having a college degree wasn’t bad enough, the lies haven’t stopped. She continues to propagate lies about the fake college degree. Even if Nate Noy’s photo was fake, it doesn’t matter. The point is that she will continue to get dragged up to Columbus for elections infractions because no one trusts her. I do not want Wulsin to win, but this embarrassment will continue until Jean is voted out of office. 2008 republican primary can’t come soon enough.

 
at 9:27 AM, September 12, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whoa whoa whoa, what did you just say Bold Italic writer??

"Another wRong wingnut whacko that believes if speak the same LIE over and over again maybe the voters will begin to buy it."

That's right, the same guy that gets on here talking whack job crap and spins every story out of control calls me a liar for calling Clinton, Pelosi, and Wulsin LIBERALS! What, did it annoy you that I was just talking non-sense for days? That there was no substance to my argument, just a couple of harsh words in big letters? Why are you crying now? You don't like to see it? Is there no truth in the fact that those three are Liberals? Why would you take the Leslie Ghiz story up top, a position I'm sure you'd agree with that it's unfair for Cleveland to get Casinos and not Cincinnati, and then say she "cut and run." Where did you get that phrase anyway?? You're pathetic and you know it.

Maybe if you keep using the same words in the same font over and over again, people will begin to buy it.

 
at 3:46 PM, September 12, 2006 Blogger LargeBill said...

Why is anonymous arguing with anonymous?

 
at 5:58 PM, September 12, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why is anonymous arguing with anonymous?

Whoa whoa whoa, your right I forgot the bi-polar medication.

I'm balanced now and sorry I called Clinton liberal. Under his administration we had a federal surplus, lower gas prices, high job growth, low interest rates, a stronger dollar and we weren't killing our children in a misleading war.

I've had enough, I'm voting DEMOCRAT 2006 !

 
at 12:01 PM, September 13, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Aw he got called out and is being Mr. Nice Guy now, how cute. I thank ABC for their movie Sunday night, that's all I'll say about Clinton.

 
at 3:25 PM, September 14, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Could it be that Victoria is dishonest? I searched the Ohio Medical License site for a Victoria Wulsin, and it came back without a search result. There is a Victoria Wells, who is licensed in OH. Why is she not using the name under which she is licensed to practice medicine? Other professionals are censured when they practice under names not on their licenses. Just asking.

 
at 2:20 PM, September 16, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wells is Dr. Victoria Wulsin's maiden name. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Wells_Wulsin

 
at 2:26 PM, September 16, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wells is Dr. Victoria Wulsin's maiden name.

"Wulsin was hired by the Heimlich Institute to analyze data on AIDS patients with malaria. In December 2004, when she presented a draft report that proposed significant upgrades in safeguards, oversight, and accountability before moving forward, and CAUTIONED AGAINST FURTHER UNSUPERVISED EXPERIMENTS IN AFRICA, she was fired.[3]"

See Wikipedia.com

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria_Wells_Wulsin

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck