*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

Robocall mystery solved

The mystery over who paid for controversial automated telephone calls has been solved -- sort of.

David Langdon, a Sharonville attorney who admitted he "facilitated" the robocalls but refused to say who paid for them, has confessed.

No one paid for them.

But, as of today, the anti-tax group Coalition Opposed to Additional Spending and Taxes -- or COAST -- will pay, Langdon said.

Langdon told the Enquirer in a Monday interview, when asked who paid for the calls and how much they cost "None of your business, none of your business, none of your business." At the time, Langdon said, he was willing to pay for the calls himself if he couldn't get someone else to.

The automated calls featured Prosecutor Joe Deters encouraging residents to attend a public hearing for "Phil Heimlich's jail plan."

Republican Commissioner Phil Heimlich is joining with Sheriff Simon Leis Jr. and financier Carl Lindner Jr. to propose placing before voters a quarter-cent sales tax increase in Hamilton County for 20 years to pay for a new 1,800-bed, $225 million jail and property tax rollback.

Because the calls specifically mentioned Heimlich, critics have charged the calls were an attempt to boost Heimlich's campaign for re-election to commissioner where he faces David Pepper, a Democrat.

"We're not hiding anything from anybody," Langdon said today.

But Langdon wouldn't name:

* The company -- or its location -- he hired to make the calls;
"It was all done by e-mail," Langdon said.

* The number of calls made.
"I absolutely have no clue," Langdon said.

* The calls cost.
"I don't know off the top of my head," Langdon said.
Langdon refused to review the contract to recall the cost.

When asked how much COAST agreed to pay for the calls, Langdon said as COAST's lawyer, he couldn't answer that. But when reminded he said COAST hadn't agreed to pay the cost until today, Langdon still refused to say how much COAST agreed to pay.

COAST founder Tom Brinkman, also a Republican Ohio lawmaker, said he knew nothing about it -- but others in COAST may because COAST members can act independently on behalf of the anti-tax group.

"I know that's hard for people to fathom. That's called trust," Brinkman said.

Chris Finney, another COAST board member, didn't immediately return telephone calls today.

The way to find out what the calls cost, Brinkman said, was to "wail till (COAST) files its campaign finance report."

COAST is a registered Political Action Committee and required under Ohio law to file reports on money it raises or spends on ballot issues or campaigns. That comment was almost exactly what Heimlich said earlier today when asked again about the calls.

"We will strictly comply with all (Ohio) campaign finance requirements," Heimlich said.

"You know, it's downright silly," Hamilton County Democratic Party chairman Tim Burke said of the secrecy over the calls.

"Why (is COAST) afraid to be clear with the public on who paid for what. They want to maintain secrecy."


9 Comments:

at 3:38 PM, August 16, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I sense a total conflict of interest.

Finney is assigned to a committee to review something he is advocating and has a PAC to promote it !!

I THINK YOU CAUGHT THEM RED-HANDED !!

You would think that an attorney would know the code of professional responsibility and avoid even the appearance of impropriety ??

Your getting better fishwrap, but, something still smells fishy !!

Keep trolling your bound to snag that rotten fish !!

Or all three centurions ??


 
at 3:45 PM, August 16, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

You can hear the robocall here:

HamiltonCountyRepublicanParty.com

 
at 3:57 PM, August 16, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm sorry, I cannot support a jail.

I have lived in hamilton county all of my life and I know of NO (That's NONE) multi-million dollar busts of a drug, organized crime, figure in our county ??

This seems almost protectionist unless we are to believe that hamilton county has no higher level thugs ??

Unlikely !!

Until the city and county can demonstrate they can and will investigate and convict on all crimes those in jail for jaywalking can be set free to provide room for the other low-level crimes, period !!

 
at 6:35 PM, August 16, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This post is appreciated, but why does the Enquirer continue to fail to acknowledge Three Centurions LLC, the real estate partnership in which COAST founder Chris Finney and Commissioner Phil Heimlich are partners? Here's proof. More documents here.

Heimlich has appointed Finney to two county commissions, Drake and Tax Levy Review, an obvious conflict of interest.

Kimball Perry, this is to request that you include a clarification to the above post by identifying any business relationships between Finney and Heimlich, including the fact that Finney has been Heimlich's attorney since 1998 continuing through the time Heimlich appointed Finney to county jobs.

Please ask Heimlich and Finney if they disclosed these relationships to any other public officials.

 
at 10:07 PM, August 16, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Isn't the bigger mystery why COAST would be supporting an unnecessary tax increase for an unnecessary jail? Maybe they don't care about keeping taxes down and are instead just a front for tax and spend republicans like Heimlich and Chabot?

 
at 1:32 AM, August 17, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

why isn't this newsworthy for print? given the confict of interest, given the secrecy, given COAST's dominance on coounty boards,this is newsworthy.

COAST has lost all credibility - they're a sunami waiting to hit the north banks of the ohio and wash away heimlich and allhis croonies.

that's one way to clean up this town

 
at 1:33 AM, August 17, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

the committee member sof the TRC aren't suppose to be beneficiaries of any matter they review, per their rules

 
at 10:17 AM, August 17, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Guess what ??

The fishwrap refused to publish a post that could lead the community to proof that finney is still the statutory agent and has the authority to appoint the statutory agent.

The dean of cincinnati posted it ??

Guess who had something to say about the three centurions:

buckwheat bushwell !!


cc: documentation file

 
at 10:44 AM, August 17, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

hindlick when confronted with questions regarding the three centurions reminds me of early Joe Walsh while he was in the James Gang ??

Do you guys remember this ??

Seems to me, you don't want to talk about it !!

Seems to me, you just turn your pretty head and:

WALK AWAY !!

Classic.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck