*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Hamilton County's slow count

Hamilton County election workers (from left) Chuck Swafford, Sherry Poland, and Dennis Predmore, and contractor Barbara White with voting machine vendor Hart Intercivic, look over precinct reports at the Hamilton County Board of Elections. (Photo by Carrie Cochran/The Cincinnati Enquirer)


The reason it took so long for the final handful of Hamilton County precincts to be counted Tuesday night (and early Wednesday morning) was that poll workers in some precincts were sending the paper ballots down to the board of elections, but not the digital memory cards from the optical scan machines that recorded vote totals.

As of about 12:40 a.m., all of the Hamilton County precincts were in except one precinct. Ten more precincts had been counted but not reported.

"We've got the paper ballots for all precincts, but we've been waiting for all the cards to come in,'' said elections director John Williams. "It's a new system, and some of the poll workers forgot that we need to have the digital memory cards.''

Williams said the back-up plan was to scan the paper ballots at the board of elections, but Williams said that would not be necessary because the final digital memory card was on its way to the board by 12:45 a.m.


3 Comments:

at 1:08 AM, May 03, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

What features do the memory cards have that prevent tampering with the data?

I thought the whole machines were being delivered sealed.

 
at 1:09 AM, May 03, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

OK, libs, you know you want to say it. Let's hear it from the liberal nutjobs out there in cyberspace:

"It's Blackwell's and Diebold's and Bush's fault!"

 
at 1:46 AM, May 03, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Enough vox.populi. Thank {insert-deity-of-choice} that we don't have diebold systems. The optical scan was the right way to go. If there are ever any problems we have a good voter verified paper trail to follow.

New system. A slow count was expected. And the problems listed the post minor & easily fixed.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck