*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Monday, December 19, 2005

Mallory supports 'someone else's budget'

Even before he was sworn in, Mayor Mark Mallory made clear that the budget City Council will debate today is "someone else's budget." It's the first budget prepared under the administration of one "stronger mayor" and introduced by the next.

In a budget message to City Council Sunday, Mallory said he supports the city manager's proposed budget update as a "fiscally sound response" to the changing circumstances since City Council passed a two-year budget a year ago. He suggested no cuts or amendments.

But Mallory did signal what his priorities will be in the 2007-2008 biennial budget: a safety director, increased spending on social services, shoring up the pension fund, eliminating blighted buildings and ensuring a prudent cash reserve.

The text of his budget message:
To: City Council
From: Mayor Mark Mallory
Date: December 18, 2005
Subject:2006 City of Cincinnati Budget

The 2006 City of Cincinnati budget as presented by the City Manager is a fiscally sound response to the city's needs and challenges. As a continuation budget tied to the 2005 budget, it is meant to continue the progress made in areas of critical concern to the city. The budget as presented provides basic funding for essential services and includes a limited number of initiatives designed to address critical needs.

First among these needs is public safety. I strongly support the additional funding for neighborhood walking patrols and the dollars provided for a new fire recruit class beginning in January 2006. However, I continue to believe we must reestablish the Director of Public Safety position to coordinate our public safety and emergency management functions. I will work with Council to create this position in the year ahead.

Dollars spent to effectively market the city constitute a good investment. For this reason, I support the additional resources dedicated to fully funding the arts allocation, increasing the support of the film commission and promoting Tall Stacks. I also support the added efforts to expand home ownership through the implementation of a one-stop housing shop.

While this budget maintains the Human Services allocation at 2005 levels, I am concerned that this level may not be fully adequate. It is my goal to increase the Human Services allocation as resources become available.

This budget is not without its limitations and I intend to work with Council and the City Manager to address these issues in the year ahead. From a fiscal standpoint, the city must protect its strong bond rating and that means restoring our general fund reserve to as close to the 10 percent level as possible. The vast majority of the 2005 ending fund balance should be used to supplement the 8 percent reserve level included in this budget.

We must also ensure that our retirement system is actuarially sound. The 2006 budget as presented makes a major step in this direction, but we must provide the resources to complete the task.

We should also work in the coming year to find new ways to address the vacant and abandoned building problem facing this city. With 1,700 vacant buildings currently, and with several hundred being demolished each year, we are slowly draining the quality housing stock that makes some of our oldest neighborhoods viable. I intend to work with Council to find ways to stabilize our existing building stock and limit the number of buildings that are in danger of being demolished.

I pledge my support to working with the City Manager and City Council to pass a fiscally responsible budget that allows for strategic investments in critical areas.
This message is a departure from former Mayor Charlie Luken's tactic of amending the budget even before transmitting it to City Council. Luken, the first mayor given increased budgetary role under the 1999 "stronger mayor" amendment, would often ask for arts funding, more police spending, or neighborhood projects -- just to send a message about his priorities.

Similarly, many members of council tacked on additional spending, allowing them to take credit for particular programs or neighborhood projects at election time.

Mallory is sending a different message -- that he hopes to avoid the chaotic end-of-year lobbying that characterizes most budgets. He said he worked with the manager and council members to make sure everything was included before it was introduced.

"This is a much more collaborative process where we had conversations with individual council members about the direction we'd like to see," Mallory said in an interview Sunday. "I think we have a budget that invests resources in public safety, in economic development. This budget invests in young people, in neighborhoods. And we are obviously looking at ways to create efficiencies."


20 Comments:

at 2:35 PM, December 19, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

So the bottom line is that all the Council/lobbyist lobbying and horse-trading took place behind closed doors, rather than in public. That's impressive change.

Also looks like the citizens got a great opportunity for input on THEIR priorities, particularly given there is no way to know what's in the budget except what's in the paper. And that only came out today, the same day as BOTH public hearings.

 
at 9:43 PM, December 19, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you "Alicia"-well put;
and "Unknown" probably doesn't even live in the city...the people who whine the most usually live in the burbs-

 
at 11:05 PM, December 19, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

If they had campaigned on Tall Stacks subsidies, the Port Authority, bigger office budgets and the Mt Lookout Support project, whatever the heck that is, I might have voted differently.

 
at 11:25 PM, December 19, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mallory really sucks. his first steps have been SO ameaturish. he's so used to state government....he has NO idea what it takes to work with in the local government system

 
at 12:33 AM, December 20, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

i don't want to read thru. are there more walking patrols?

 
at 8:29 AM, December 20, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

yeah, that's right, he has no clue!

Maybe Mallory should just adopt the failed policies of his predecessor and stop trying to turn this city around.

After all, isn't that what we deserve if we turn back towards that direction?

 
at 11:04 AM, December 20, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's exactly what Mallory seems to be doing. I was glad to see Rev. Duane Holm call him out for not fulfulling his promise to restore human service funding so that he could give money to connected special interests.

 
at 11:13 AM, December 20, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The more things change, the more they stay the same. New mayor, new council, exactly the same budget!

And all those promises...I promise I will get to them next year, and I hope everyone forgets by then.

 
at 1:04 PM, December 20, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good point, Alicia DTLHA. Let's just cancel future public hearings--let 'em surf the web once they hear somehow there's a new budget, dig it up, and e-mail their representatives their opinion. Sounds like great government.

 
at 1:08 PM, December 20, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

First you have to ask yourself:
Under what conditions are the budget?
Can we maintain this budget?
Knowledge is the answer my friend.

Mallory forever, Pepper never!!!

 
at 2:44 PM, December 20, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I refuse to accept Mallory's answer that CityLink is a "neighborhood issue". What does that mean? Isn't everything? This could have far reaching effects on the city, and he bails?

STRONG MAYOR?

 
at 4:02 PM, December 20, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's a truly outrageous and unacceptable position. But pretty characteristic.

 
at 5:16 PM, December 20, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

personalities aside, the fundamental difference here is mallory aspires to be a CEO type mayor, while pepper wanted to be more of a COO.

mallory's success will heavily rely on the quality of city manager (and new administration)he selects.

luken basically tried the same approach, but valerie lemme turned out to be a poor choice, and luken paid dearly.

the shrink

 
at 5:42 PM, December 20, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

CEOs have some sense of priorities and vision. Mallory has none. While he says he has vision, he never says what that vision is--just talks in general-speak. And this budget shows a total lack of priorities--just random stuff different people (Councilmembers/lobbyists) wanted.

This will lead to government going in circles--something no manager can make succeed.

 
at 8:46 PM, December 20, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's not all bad. There are walking patrols, which was great last summer and probably the best thing from the last council. Good for the mayor and council.

 
at 9:19 PM, December 20, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
at 7:50 AM, December 21, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Nice to see the Pepperbots are alive and well and still wankers"

Key anon, you seem to forget that almost half the people in this city voted against Mallory. That's quite a lot of potential "Pepperbots."

Given that Mallory inherited universal name recognition from his daddy and had the support of the Democratic base--blacks & unions--in a Democratic city, it's amazing that he barely won. Too boot, he had the support of promminent Republicans who found him so pleasant and agreeable to work with.

Mr. Personality can win friends; it's too bad he's an empty suit who can't govern. He'll learn that he can't scmooze himself over teh next four years like he did as a minority party member of the house & senate.

 
at 9:00 AM, December 21, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
at 11:59 AM, December 27, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The "empty suit" tag sure rings true. His 10 years in Columbus yeilded a meaninless 14th ammendment law 100 years too late. He tells people it was the "highlight of my career". If that was worth 10 years of work, what's he going to do in 4 years here?? nothing

 
at 10:34 AM, December 28, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mallory's resume: worked at a photomat@19. His mommy gets him a job stacking books at the library for 10 years. His daddy retired and gave him his seat as Ohio rep.
Went to senate and mayor to avoid term limits. The guy is 43? still lives with mommy. Dresses nice, gives vague answers and panders to the list of donors daddy gave him. What has Mallory really done? What will he do? Continue to proove the Peter Principle to be correct.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck