*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Saturday, December 17, 2005

Tarbell and Thomas ran most frugal campaigns

Money is important: Seven of the City Council candidates who spent the most money also got the most votes.

But it's not everything: Democrat Cecil Thomas and Charterite Jim Tarbell made the most of more meager resources to win seats on City Council.

And that's not to mention Mayor Mark Mallory, who overcame a three-to-one fund-raising disadvantage to thwart fellow Democrat David Pepper's $1.2 million campaign.

Here are the cost-per-vote totals for the major-party candidates, as of campaign finance reports filed with the Hamilton County Board of Elections Friday:

Rank Candidate Spending Total Votes Cost
per
vote
8 Chris Bortz (C) $287,753 27,304 $10.54
6 Jeff Berding (D) $293,783 28,344 $10.36
1 John Cranley (D) $238,834 35,603 $ 6.71
4 David C. Crowley (D) $180,313 29,856 $ 6.04
7 Chris Monzel (R) $143,910 27,911 $ 5.16
5 Leslie Ghiz (R) $131,442 29,758 $ 4.42
11 Christopher Smitherman (C) $ 73,100 24,642 $ 2.97
17 Nick Spencer (C) $ 27,247 9,462 $ 2.88
3 Laketa Cole (D) $ 78,512 29,966 $ 2.62
10 Sam Malone (R) $ 67,305 25,838 $ 2.60
16 Samantha Herd (D) $ 30,065 14,306 $ 2.10
15 John Eby (R) $ 32,939 16,271 $ 2.02
2 Jim Tarbell (C) $ 64,695 32,392 $ 2.00
12 Damon Lynch III (D) $ 43,141 22,556 $ 1.91
9 Cecil Thomas (D) $ 31,161 27,091 $ 1.15

A few special notes:
  • Independent Gerry Kraus spent $30,192 to get 4,719 votes, for a cost-per-vote of $6.40.

  • Democrats Eve Bolton and Wendell Young are not included. They did not file post-general campaign finance reports by Friday's 4 p.m. deadline.

  • Unlike previous campaign finance totals reported here, these are amounts spent, not raised.
Previous stories:


11 Comments:

at 8:16 PM, December 17, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Money shouldn't determine the outcome of our elections!

It usually does and that makes them more like auctions.

 
at 3:20 AM, December 19, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ahh...money and politics. This is what it's all about. Who had better ideas and vision for Cincinnati: John Eby or Chris Bortz?

Chris Bortz is a child of privilege, has a strong name, and is from a well-connected, wealthy family. He had plenty of campaign cash for the flashy downtown headquarters, the commercial showing off his trophy wife, and to spread his name across the city. This does NOT make him the best man for the job.

John Eby had little money to spend. However, his passion and ideas are far better than any that have come from Bortz. He is a self-made, educated man who cares deeply about the city. He wasn't heard without the $$$$$$.

Wish there were a better way.

Shame.

 
at 8:26 AM, December 19, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wrong - these stats confirm money doesn't buy elections. When will you liberals recognize this? If money buys elections then why is Pepper out and Tarbell and Thomas in?

Money is just a vehicle for furthering our free speech that is protected by the constitution.

DeWine, Pepper, and a whole list of others across the nation clearly show that you cannot buy elections with your money or family alone.

 
at 9:43 AM, December 19, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

These numbers show that John Eby should definitely run again.

 
at 11:36 AM, December 19, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually, these stats do show that you can buy votes. You might not always be able to buy enough (see Pepper), but it certainly helps. The top six money spenders were all elected, coincidence, I think not.
It is a shame that there is not a level playing field. If aren't born as a pretty boy (or girl) your chances just aren't that good.

 
at 1:10 PM, December 19, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

A big and untold part of this story is inedepenent expenditures. How can the Enquirer fail to report the 100k+ that the unions spent for Mallory? It is by far his biggest contributor and the totals are meaningless without such information.

 
at 1:54 PM, December 19, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

$100K? Try $200K.

 
at 9:42 AM, December 21, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 12/19 3:20am:

“…the commercial showing off his trophy wife…”

Shame on you.

As a public servant and public figure, I expect criticism, be it founded or not. I expect mindless, heartless and ill-informed attacks going hand-in hand with more carefully considered and constructive criticism.

However, we must all protect and defend our freedom of speech. That means we must be responsible with our words. The most destructive consequence of our most cherished freedom is that too many people mistake defamatory accusations with reasoned dissent. That makes us all weaker, dumber, and angrier while also distracting our focus from high-minded public discourse.

Add to that the internet and its shroud of anonymity and our responsible attitude towards speech becomes even more imperative.

You have displayed a reckless disregard for others with your hateful comments. My wife is most certainly a far better person than you. She would undoubtedly advise me to ignore your ignorance, rise above it, and move on to serious matters. Of course, she would be right. Nevertheless, I feel compelled to invite you to come out from under your rock and deliver your venomous drivel to me in person. I can be found at City Hall.

You, Mr. or Mrs. Anonymous, epitomize what is wrong with America.

Shame on you.

Chris Bortz
Member, Cincinnati City Council
513-352-3249

 
at 9:31 PM, December 21, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

What ideas and vision did Eby have?

Why is Chris Bortz responding to anonymous bloggers?

 
at 8:38 PM, December 22, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

John Eby is an intelligent man who has great ideas and would make an excellent council member. It is a shame he did not make it on council this year. I hope he considers running again and is succesful. He was definetely one of the most intelligent council candidates and I challenge anyone to differ.

 
at 2:17 AM, January 13, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chris's background has nothing to do with his position in politics. He worked as hard as everyone else to earn his place on our city council. Not that it is any of anyone's business, but my dad and Chris's dad have both started from the bottom and worked hard to get to where they are. They have made sure that we were all raised to work hard and appreciate everything we have as well. So for you to make an ignorantly blind comment about our family and my cousin only discredits your ability to think for yourself and to argue the actual issues in the city instead of the economic status of the politicians. It only sounds uneducated and bitter. You should be supportive of all of our councilmen and councilwomen. They are all there for the same reason: to create a better city for all of us to live in. It has nothing to do with their personal lives and wives. Chris's wife may be beautiful, but she has a bigger heart than anyone I know and would do anything for anyone. So for you to attack her is just plain cowardly and childish. If you had taken time to have one conversation with her at any one of the 'Meet the Canidates' nights, you would be embarassed that you made those comments. The same goes for Chris. For those who criticized the letters that Chris's wife sent out, you should be ashamed of yourself. Those took a lot of hard work to write and were sincere.

What good comes out of attacking people like that? It only creates more hatred in our city. You should try to focus that energy wasted on your anger towards collaborating with our city leaders to create positive change. That is exactly what Chris encouraged you to do. Get involved in person instead of hiding behind your computer screen. The city would love your help and wlecome your suggestions. For Chris to take 10 minutes out of his busy day to read comments that were written on this blog is encouraging to citizens. He is trying to listen to what you have to say. That is one of his his jobs! So if there are constuctive ideas, maybe you should express those instead of personal attacks so that he can relay them to city council. Being a victim doesn't get you far.

In the future, focus on the issues facing our city council instead of their personal lives.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck