*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Friday, February 16, 2007

Jean Schmidt's floor statement

From the Congressional Record:

Mrs. SCHMIDT.

Madam Speaker, I rise tonight after another long day out of disappointment--disappointed that we are not having a real debate about how we win in Iraq. We have spent countless hours in what is little more than political theater.

This body is scheduled to meet 145 days this year. Just to open our doors, we spend over $8 million for each legislative day. This debate will cost some $30 million, yet it will yield nothing but a partisan vote on a nonbinding resolution after literally hundreds of speeches designed to do no more than charge up one's own political base.

I am deeply disappointed. The people expect more from us. They expect solutions, not grandstanding. They expect both parties to work together. There will be no victory when our votes are tallied. We will have every problem we began with, but be even further apart politically.

Tonight, I believe we embarrass ourselves before our brave men and women in uniform, before the American people and before our enemies.


45 Comments:

at 6:11 PM, February 16, 2007 Blogger JohnDWoodSr said...

Bravo, Mrs Schmidt!
A cogent analysis of the Republican side of the debate. I didn't think you'd admit it.

 
at 8:08 PM, February 16, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"We have spent countless hours in what is little more than political theater"


Oh, the irony...the irony...

 
at 8:18 PM, February 16, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's a grade-A speech by Congresswoman Jean Schmidt.

 
at 8:20 PM, February 16, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Typical wRong wingnut whacko elephant dung propaganda !

Just what was accomplished with the last "monica gate" debacle ?

What changed ?

How much did that cost our nation ?

How much did the whacko SEC deregulation cost our nation with Enron, Sunbeam, WorldCom ?

How much has the trumped up, NO WMD, theological whacko oil war cost our nation ?

The wRong wingnut whackos blew their chance !

PATHETIC !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2007 !

 
at 11:15 PM, February 16, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

whatever happened to banning the bold guy?

maybe you guys can just give him a job in your spell check department? clearly, he has no life.

 
at 11:53 PM, February 16, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jean is the embarassment.

 
at 12:01 AM, February 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cincy911Truth and BS in Bold, tell me how your two comments are different. Both are inflamed inanities filled with empty accusations, name-calling and just plain silliness. No one will believe anything either of you write, as long as you both persist in acting stupid and writing drivel. You bring dishonor to yourselves and to the Donkey party.

Congresswoman Jean Schmidt's brief speech was well-written and well-delivered. And she is right on. I applaud her remarks, and I weep for the nation, because of the idiocy of the "non-binding resolution." Our Congress is in the hands of fools who place their own political fortunes above, indeed--way above, the well-being of our country and the safety and mission of our troops. And if the damned Dems take the next step of cutting off funding for the war in Iraq, there will be hell to pay.

God bless America, and may America bless God by returning to Him, soon!

 
at 3:09 AM, February 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have often been a critic of Rep. Schmidt's general oversimplification and misunderstanding of difficult issues and of her shrill rantings. Yet, after watching some of the speeches by her colleagues, I almost feel I owe her an apology. Yes, her statement was vague and rather pointless (artfully calibrated so as not to express an opinion either way on the trauma of Iraq) --a waste of the very time and money she complains of -- but at least she was reasonably grammatical and not too loud. Nor did she invoke the Alamo as several of her colleagues did. Nor did she invoke Lincoln or Robert Frost as they did.Nor, for once, did she rail against tax increases which may be a first for her public statements. Nor did she present any of her laughably ill-informed views on microeconomics. Nor did she again pat herself on the back for her purchase of federally subsidized ethanol-feuled car. All in all, good show, Jean.

 
at 10:28 AM, February 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"...whatever happened to banning the bold guy?...."

bold guy = gender bias ?

The decision was:

Without "bold endeavors" wRong wingnut whackos would have nothing to talk about !

You see the goose-stepping, elephant dung slinging "followers" are so shallow that they vote against their own economic interests !

The wRong wingnuts have no substantive dialogue to contribute to an issue !

If we ban the "LEADER", the blogs would be empty !

The wRong wingnuts who "follow" and point fingers, while attempting to shoot the messenger, would be lost without comment !

ANnOY, you reinforce the decision !

You see, when we "point the finger" at the messenger, "LEADING" with "BOLD ENDEAVORS", we receive more posts than any other topic !

The traffic is fantastic !

Thanks for playing, follow the "LEADER" !

PATHETIC !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2007 !

 
at 5:14 PM, February 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

How are Jean Schmidt's words anything other than partisan rhetoric? Did she suggest a solution to the Bush Administration's failures in Iraq? Why does she continue to keep up this tired line about those who disagree with the President's policies emboldening the enemy, or as she put it this time "embarrassing ourselves [in front of] our enemies"? If Schmidt had nothing substantive to say, and it's clear by the text of her speech that she didn't, why did she bother to waste our time, and our money, by sauntering up to the microphone in the first place?

 
at 5:45 PM, February 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jean Schmidt and the failed policies she represents are an embarresment to our nation and a tradgedy for our soldiers that must carry out this unconstitutional, illegal and immoral quagmire.

How ironic that she would talk about wasted money as she supports a war against a country that was no threat to us. She swore to uphold the constitution but has trashed it every cahnce she gets. Unfortunately the Democrats aren't any better.

 
at 6:46 PM, February 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Jean Schmidt,

More than 2 years ago, I was the first person to run against you in your last campaign for Congress. During that time, I challenged you and Bob McEwen to a debate on HEALTHCARE, the ECONOMY and the WAR in IRAQ. Since more Americans have been asked to pay the ultimate price by you and others like yourself in Washington, my challenge still stands.

You can contact me at anytime of the day or night. Maybe the Cincinnati Enquirer will host a public forum. There are serious issues in this country that demand serious attention, and although you've found a better speechwriter, you are still not solving the problems of this country. If you won't... I WILL.

Although I am not running for anything right now, the next time that I do, the first thing that I am going to do after my announcement is challenge you to the same debate again. However, I am sure that you will ignore my challenge just like you did before. But it looks like you want to make statements about the cost of government... So I think that I should add that item to the top of the list.

It's cold in Hamilton County today. Not at first, but after you've been outside for awhile... you start to notice. I met alot of nice people today.

Jim Parker
Future Democratic Candidate for US Congress
Southern Ohio - 2nd District
2005 & 2006... 2010

Quietly and Successfully working to represent thousands of incredible people who live and raise their families in Southern Ohio...

 
at 10:27 PM, February 17, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Keep it up Congresswoman...you're doing something right or they wouldn't be attacking so outlandishly. Uh, for all of you whack-job liberals, that means...ya know what, I'm tired of trying to educate you nimrods. Go look it up. Hee, hee, hee...2010 cannot come soon enough!

Bring. It. On!

 
at 2:06 PM, February 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

So Jean...
the issue isn't:

-no wmds
-an administration lied to get us into iraq
-once in iraq-no contingency plans
-insufficient body armor for the troops
-a quagmire of epic proportions
-creating a hotbed of terrorism
-gross war profiteering by Bush Cronies
-10's of billions of dollars unaccounted for
-redeployment after redeployment id disastrous for the troops

BUT INSTEAD THE COST OF THE IRAQ DEBATE IN CONGRESS?

I hope you former republicans out there will acknowledge the role that a corrupted election system played in getting these loons into office!

 
at 2:25 PM, February 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear TNP

RE: "God bless America, and may America bless God by returning to Him, soon!"

RAPTURE IS NOT AN EXIT STRATEGY!

 
at 3:52 PM, February 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Anonymous at 2:25 pm, 2/18, the ONLY acceptable "exit strategy" is victory. I suspect you are "Alter or Abolish," because you've yelled the same anti-Rapture nonsense before under that name. Rapture or not, hold onto your hat, dude, 'cause when the Second Coming occurs, you are in for a shock. Don't say you weren't warned.

And Cincy911Truth, I will be at one of them, but not that one. If you go to the right one, look for the most handsome, articulate, affluent and intelligent Christian gentleman there, and it'll be me.
I'm still working on my humility....

 
at 7:37 PM, February 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"when the Second Coming occurs, you are in for a shock. Don't say you weren't warned."

Wow. So people really are that stupid? I thought that people believing this was just a legend created by the paranoid hyper-left.

This explains alot about TNP and his support for Schmidt.

 
at 7:40 PM, February 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

With all of the talk about banning BPG for being aggressive and annoying, why hasn't the same been said about TNP?

He contributes less and is even more abrassive...

 
at 8:47 PM, February 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have no idea what alter or abolish means, but I would like to suggest you do some research (don't believe anonymous me, but do your own research!) on this:

Among the 3,096 United States service personnel killed in Iraq is Col. Ted Westhusing. The U.S. Army’s top military ethicist and a full-time professor at West Point, Col. Westhusing volunteered for service in Iraq in order to better teach his cadet charges. He died on June 5, 2005, the victim of a gunshot wound to the head.



In Iraq, Col. Westhusing was charged with oversight of the training of Iraq’s new security forces. Among his responsibilities were the investigation of reported contract irregularities by U.S. Investigations Services (USIS) and human rights abuses by its civilian employees.

Once a federal agency, USIS became a privatized government contractor growing fat off the trough of Uncle Sam while executives lined their numbered Swiss bank accounts with big bucks off the American taxpayer. The average American would probably never guess who is a Big Time investor in USIS—The Carlyle Group.



West Point professor dies in Iraq

Army Col Theodore S. Westhusing

44, of Dallas; assigned to the United States Military Academy, West Point, N.Y.; serving with the Multinational Security Transition Command-Iraq; died June 5 of non-combat-related injuries in Baghdad.

By Shaun Schafer
Associated Press

TULSA, Okla. — A West Point professor who volunteered to serve in Iraq has been killed in action, family members said Monday.

Col. Ted S. Westhusing, 45, was killed in action on Sunday, family members said Monday. They did not release specifics on how he was killed. Family members received official notification of the death from the military late Sunday.

Westhusing, a 1979 graduate of Jenks High School, had doctorates in Russian, philosophy and military strategy, his eldest brother Tim Westhusing of Broken Arrow, said Monday.

“He wanted to go over there and make things better,” Tim Westhusing said. “He has a wife and three children. He didn’t have to go…”

SNIP…

Westhusing graduated from West Point in 1983. He left for Iraq near the end of 2004 and was helping train the Iraqi army, working as counter-terrorism and special operations director under Lt. Gen. David Petraeus.

CONTINUED…

http://www.militarycity.com/valor/900007.html

THE GUYS YOU ARE BACKING ARE FAR FROM THE ETHICAL CHRISTIANS THAT YOU PERCEIVE. OVER 10 BILLION UNACCOUNTED FOR BUT NOT ENOUGH $ FOR BODY ARMOR? CUTS IN VETERANS BENEFITS.

Do yourself a favor and research Westhusing.

 
at 9:02 PM, February 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bombshell from Newsweek: Rove & the White House had heads up on Bob Novak column regarding Valerie Plame.( the covert CIA agent WHO WAS WORKING ON COUNTER PROLIFERATION OF WMDS IN IRAN & IRAQ WITH CIA FRONT COMPANY BREWSTER-JENNINGS.)

Karl Rove and the White House knew a covert agent was about to be outed and did nothing about it!


Asked by one of Libby's lawyers if he had talked about Plame with anybody else before outing her in his column, Novak said he'd discussed her with a lobbyist named Richard Hohlt. Who, the lawyer pressed, is Hohlt? "He's a very good source of mine" whom I talk to "every day," Novak replied. Indeed, Hohlt is such a good source that after Novak finished his column naming Plame, he testified, he did something most journalists rarely do: he gave the lobbyist an advance copy of his column. What Novak didn't tell the jury is what the lobbyist then did with it: Hohlt confirmed to NEWSWEEK that he faxed the forthcoming column to their mutual friend Karl Rove (one of Novak's sources for the Plame leak), thereby giving the White House a heads up on the bombshell to come.

The trial of Libby—who is charged with lying about his own alleged role in the disclosure of Plame's identity—has revealed much about how government officials and journalists swap secrets. But Hohlt's outing was especially revealing. Unlike many of the high-profile Washington players who have populated the Plame affair, Hohlt is a Beltway power broker of a different sort. He works quietly, rarely makes the papers and likes it that way. Hohlt, 58, came to Washington more than 30 years ago as an aide to Sen. Richard Lugar. He now represents A-list clients like Bristol Myers, Chevron, JPMorgan Chase and the Nuclear Energy Association. At the same time, he raises buckets of cash for the Republican Party: he was designated a "Super Ranger," a fund-raiser who raked in more than $500,000 for President Bush's re-election.

-snip
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17202408/site/newsweek/page/2/

KARL ROVE AND THE WHITEHOUSE KNEW A COVERT CIA AGENT WAS ABOUT TO BE OUTED AND DID NOTHING ABOUT IT!

REPEAT THIS 3 TIMES AND THINK FOR YOUR SELF!

 
at 9:08 PM, February 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Perhaps Ms Schmidt would like to disguss this:

The real treason: Our maimed soldiers are living in cockroach infested ghettos

Oh my God. While the Republicans were posturing all week about how the Democrats hate the troops, the Sunday Washington Post takes a look at how the Bush administration and the Republican congress have been treating our hurt and maimed troops back here in the US: in cockroach infested ghettos.

It is absolutely sickening. Senator Reid and Speaker Pelosi should lock the Congress down until every single one of these problems is finally fixed.
Behind the door of Army Spec. Jeremy Duncan's room, part of the wall is torn and hangs in the air, weighted down with black mold. When the wounded combat engineer stands in his shower and looks up, he can see the bathtub on the floor above through a rotted hole. The entire building, constructed between the world wars, often smells like greasy carry-out. Signs of neglect are everywhere: mouse droppings, belly-up cockroaches, stained carpets, cheap mattresses.

This is the world of Building 18, not the kind of place where Duncan expected to recover when he was evacuated to Walter Reed Army Medical Center from Iraq last February with a broken neck and a shredded left ear, nearly dead from blood loss. But the old lodge, just outside the gates of the hospital and five miles up the road from the White House, has housed hundreds of maimed soldiers recuperating from injuries suffered in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

-snip

http://americablog.blogspot.com/2007/02/real-treason-our-maimed-soldiers-are.html

 
at 9:22 PM, February 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

TNP, research yourself just who you are backing:

Rev Moon/Bush Ties

The Original 'Dark Side of Rev. Moon' Series

Dark Side of Rev. Moon: Hooking Bush
Despite his virulent anti-Americanism, Rev. Sun Myung Moon still relies on friends in Washington to help him expand his political-and-media power base. Moon's latest reach into South America had the helping hand of former U.S. President George Bush. But the Moon-Bush alliance dates back years and could reach into the future, as Bush lines up conservative backing for the expected White House bid of his eldest son. (7/28/97)

Dark Side of Rev. Moon: Buying the Right
Rev. Sun Myung Moon calls America "Satan's harvest" and vows to subjugate its people under a Korea-based theocracy. Normally, this anti-Americanism would not sit well. But Moon has spread around billions of dollars from mysterious sources to Washington conservatives. The money has helped key allies, such as Jerry Falwell and Oliver North. It's the real Asian money scandal -- and the Washington media is missing it. (8/11/97)


Dark Side of Rev. Moon: Drug Allies
Washington is obsessed with interpretations of arcane fund-raising laws. But a more serious question -- the political influence-buying of Rev. Sun Myung Moon -- remains unasked. The issue is particularly important because of Moon's free-spending ways and his past alliances with anti-communist crime figures connected to the Japanese yakuza of Ryoichi Sasakawa and the U.S. drug mob of Santo Trafficante Jr. (10/13/97)

Dark Side of Rev. Moon: Moon's Billions & Washington's Blind Eye
Newly released Justice Department files show how the Reagan-Bush administrations cited the Constitution to protect Rev. Sun Myung Moon from investigation as a foreign agent -- while using his organization to spy on American critics of Reagan policies. Moon apparently earned his political protection the old-fashioned way: he bought it with lots of money. (12/22/97)

More Recent Stories on Moon's Political Empire

The GOP's $3 Billion Propaganda Organ
When history tries to make sense of what happened to American politics in this era, it should take into account the extraordinary story of how a right-wing Korean cult leader, Sun Myung Moon, bought influence with the U.S. political class by pouring billions of dollars into conservative causes, including a daily newspaper, the Washington Times. Though Moon operatives have tried to hide the total price tag for this pro-Republican propaganda organ, a longtime Times employee has pegged Moon's spending at more than $3 billion in cash. The other big question is where did all this money come from? A Special Report. December 27, 2006

The Moon-Bush Cash Conduit
South Korean theocrat Sun Myung Moon has long boasted of his ability to "hook" politicians by putting money into their pockets and into their political machines. But Moon's most important catch may have come from the millions of dollars sunk into the powerful Bush family -- and the subsequent lack of U.S. interest in evidence of Moon's criminal activities. June 14, 2006

http://www.consortiumnews.com/archive/moon.html

 
at 9:32 PM, February 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"....most handsome, articulate, affluent and intelligent Christian gentleman there, and it'll be me.
I'm still working on my humility...."

Careful Cincy911, the truth is that it sounds like TNP is trying to seduce and "folley fondle" you !

You know what can happen when those pent up fundamentalist lay their hands on you !

PATHETIC !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2007 !

 
at 10:26 PM, February 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

This Fax Bombshell that Rove and the WH knew about Novak's article 3 days before it was published PROVES INTENT. Intent is the big part of the Intelligence Identities Protection Act. If Bush or CHeney declassified her name they should have notified Plame. But they did not, even though they knew.

Hohlt confirmed to NEWSWEEK that he faxed the forthcoming column to their mutual friend Karl Rove (one of Novak's sources for the Plame leak), thereby giving the White House a heads up on the bombshell to come.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17202408/site/newsweek /



This is a direct violation of the IIPA which specifically mentions "intentionally discloses":

PROTECTION OF IDENTITIES OF CERTAIN UNITED STATES UNDERCOVER INTELLIGENCE OFFICERS, AGENTS, INFORMANTS, AND SOURCES
SEC. 601. <50 U.S.C. 421> (a) Whoever, having or having had authorized access to classified information that identifies a covert agent, intentionally discloses any information identifying such covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such covert agent and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent’s intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(b) Whoever, as a result of having authorized access to classified information, learns the identity of a covert agent and intentionally discloses any information identifying such covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such covert agent and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such covert agent’s intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(c) Whoever, in the course of a pattern of activities intended to identify and expose covert agents and with reason to believe that such activities would impair or impede the foreign intelligence activities of the United States, discloses any information that identifies an individual as a covert agent to any individual not authorized to receive classified information, knowing that the information disclosed so identifies such individual and that the United States is taking affirmative measures to conceal such individual’s classified intelligence relationship to the United States, shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(d) A term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be consecutive to any other sentence of imprisonment.


DEFENSES AND EXCEPTIONS
SEC. 602. <50 U.S.C. 422> (a) It is a defense to a prosecution under section 601 that before the commission of the offense with which the defendant is charged, the United States had publicly acknowledged or revealed the intelligence relationship to the United States of the individual the disclosure of whose intelligence relationship to the United States is the basis for the prosecution.

(b)(1) Subject to paragraph (2), no person other than a person committing an offense under section 601 shall be subject to prosecution under such section by virtue of section 2 or 4 of title 18, United States Code, or shall be subject to prosecution for conspiracy to commit an offense under such section.

(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply (A) in the case of a person who acted in the course of a pattern of activities intended to identify and expose covert agents and with reason to believe that such activities would impair or impede the foreign intelligence activities of the United States, or (B) in the case of a person who has authorized access to classified information.

(c) It shall not be an offense under section 601 to transmit information described in such section directly to either congressional intelligence committee.

(d) It shall not be an offense under section 601 for an individual to disclose information that solely identifies himself as a covert agent.


In short, if Bush and/or Cheney decided to declassify a name or report, they would have to notify the CIA first as well as NOTIFY THE AGENT BEING DECLASSIFIED SO THEY COULD PROTECT THEMSELVES.

Indict
Impeach
Imprison

 
at 10:37 PM, February 18, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

So. You’ve built yourself an empire, eh?

Well, bully for you!

What’s next, you ask? Well, now you’ve got to do what everybody does when they have an empire, of course. You’ve got to worry about it falling apart, mate!

But how to tell for sure? Let me see if I can be helpful. Here are some rules of thumb to keep in mind, thirty-six sure-fire indicators that your empire is falling apart:

You know your empire’s crumbling when the folks who are gearing up their empire to replace yours start blowing up satellites in space. And then they don’t bother to return your phone calls when you ring up to ask why.

You know your empire’s crumbling when those same folks are cutting deals left, right and center across Asia, Latin America and Africa, while you, your lousy terms, and your arrogant attitude are no longer welcome.

You know your empire’s crumbling when you’re spending your grandchildren’s money like a drunken sailor, and letting your soon-to-be rivals finance your little splurge (i.e., letting them own your country).

You know your empire’s crumbling when it’s considered an achievement to pretend that you’ve halved the rate at which you’re adding to the massive mountain of debt you’ve already accumulated.

You know your empire’s crumbling when you weaken your currency until it looks as anemic as a Paris runway model, and you’re still setting record trade deficits. (Hint: Because you’re not making anything anymore.)

You know your empire’s crumbling when “the little brown ones” (thank you George H.W. Bush – certainly not me – for that lovely expression) in country after country of “your backyard” blow you off and proudly elect anti-imperialist leftist governments.

You know your empire’s crumbling when you can’t topple those governments and replace them with nice puppet regimes – like in the good old days – even if you wanted to. And you badly want to.

You know your empire’s crumbling when one of their leaders comes to the United Nations and makes fun of your emperor, calling him the devil, and joking about smelling sulphur where he just stood. And though a few folks cringe, everybody laughs.

You know your empire’s crumbling when just about your entire military land force is tied up in a worse-than-useless war launched on the basis of complete fabrications, that every day is actually making you less – not more – secure from external threat.

You know your empire’s crumbling when almost half the soldiers in that war are high-paid mercenaries, and you don’t dare institute a draft.

You know your empire’s crumbling when you send soldiers into war with two weeks training and a lack of armor, and then you keep them there for three, four and five rotations.

You know your empire’s crumbling when a member of the Axis of Evil can test missiles and explode nuclear warheads, and all you can do about it is mumble some pathetic warnings about how they better not do that again or there will be consequences.

You know your empire’s crumbling when you even think that there is an Axis of Evil.

You know your empire’s crumbling when a rag-tag military hodge-podge of irregulars has you pinned down in an endless fight you can’t win, but also can’t lose.

You know your empire’s crumbling when you’re too dumb to even ban Humvees as a first step toward ending your dependency on a foreign-owned crucial resource.

You know your empire’s crumbling when you trade your prior moral leadership on human rights issues for global disgust at your torture, ‘extraordinary rendition’ (a.k.a. kidnaping for torture) and the dismantling of nine centuries worth of civil liberties progress.

You know your empire’s crumbling when you blow off international law that you once helped create, and undermine the institutions of international governance that you once helped build.

You know your empire’s crumbling when opinion polls confirm that every month you’re more and more despised throughout the world.

You know your empire’s crumbling when you can’t even pull off the hanging of a tin-pot murderous former dictator without turning him into a hero.

You know your empire’s crumbling when you’re the richest country in the world, but nearly 50 million of your people don’t have basic health care coverage.

You know your empire’s crumbling when the World Health Organization ranks your healthcare system 37th ‘best’ in the world, just above Slovenia, and just below Costa Rica. (And far below Colombia, Cyprus, Saudi Arabia and Morocco.)

You know your empire’s crumbling when instead of making it easier for citizens to obtain a higher education, you’re making it harder and more expensive.

You know your empire’s crumbling when your government gives tax breaks to industries as a reward for exporting your jobs elsewhere.

You know your empire’s crumbling when the so-called ‘opposition’ party can’t even turn that obscenity into a viable campaign theme and use it to clobber the worst emperor in your history.

You know your empire’s crumbling when your middle class has been stagnant for three decades, while the wealth of the hyper-rich continues to climb through the roof.

You know your empire’s crumbling when your reaction to that is to exacerbate the problem by enacting tax policies that massively increase further still the gap between the rich and the rest.

You know your empire’s crumbling when the predatory class has taken over your government and is stripping the country of everything not bolted down to the floor. And then it sells the floor itself, as well, to your rivals.

You know your empire’s crumbling when you’re spending tens of billions of dollars you don’t own on new nuclear warheads and space weapons that don’t work, to be used against an enemy you don’t have.

You know your empire’s crumbling when one of your cities drowns and your government does next to nothing before, during and after.

You know your empire’s crumbling when a massive environmental nightmare is looming around the corner, and your emperor not only ignores it, but claims it isn’t real while taking steps to exacerbate it.

You know your empire’s crumbling when your emperor is warned by a CIA briefer of an imminent terrorist attack of vast proportions, and responds by remaining on vacation and dismissing the briefer with the words: “All right. You've covered your ass, now.”

You know your empire’s crumbling when the same emperor drops everything to fly across the country from his vacation home in order to sign a bill intervening on the wrong side of a personal medical drama involving a single family.

You know your empire’s crumbling when gays and immigrants are used as diversionary issues to keep people from thinking about the pillaging of their country and their wallets actually taking place. And it works.

You know your empire’s crumbling when people are getting more religious and less scientific, not the other way around.

You know your empire’s crumbling when your political leaders start to be chosen by dynastic rules of succession.

And you especially know your empire’s crumbling when the most idiotic child of one of the least accomplished leaders in its history is not only crowned as the next emperor, but is even revered for a time by most of the public as a great one.

Rome? Britain? Spain?

At this rate we’ll be lucky to end up like Belgium.

David Michael Green is a professor of political science at Hofstra University in New York. He is delighted to receive readers' reactions to his articles (dmg@regressiveantidote.net), but regrets that time constraints do not always allow him to respond. More of his work can be found at his website, www.regressiveantidote.net.

 
at 6:50 AM, February 19, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Look like it's going to be another Hamilton County weekend. Blue Ash.

 
at 10:31 AM, February 19, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anon 10:26, all well and good. Problem is that Valerie Plame was not a covert agent. Therefore, IIPA did not apply to her.

 
at 1:07 PM, February 19, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous at 7:40 pm, 2/18, learn to spell. You meant to call me "abrasive," not "abrassive." Words are important, and you ought to consider an evening school class in composition and grammar. If you're going to spout put-downs and pejoratives, at least spell them correctly. Otherwise, no one will take you seriously....

 
at 1:32 PM, February 19, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

to 10:26 2/19:

Valerie Plame was a "covert agent" as defined by the law. In her cover position as a consultant to Brewster-Jennings, Ms. Plame served overseas on clandestine missions. Just because she did not live overseas full time does not mean she did not work overseas using her status as a non-official cover officer.

-snip

http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2005/10/the_law_is_on_t.html

Valerie Plame was undercover until the day she was identified in Robert Novak's column. I entered on duty with Valerie in September of 1985. Every single member of our class--which was comprised of Case Officers, Analysts, Scientists, and Admin folks--were undercover. I was an analyst and Valerie was a case officer. Case officers work in the Directorate of Operations and work overseas recruiting spies and running clandestine operations. Although Valerie started out working under "official cover"--i.e., she declared she worked for the U.S. Government but in something innocuous, like the State Department--she later became a NOC aka non official cover officer. A NOC has no declared relationship with the United States Government. These simple facts apparently are too complicated for someone of Ms. Toensing's limited intellectual abilities.

-snip

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-c-johnson/washington-post-_b_41548.html

Larry Johnson biography:

Biography

Larry C. Johnson is CEO and co-founder of BERG Associates, LLC, an international business-consulting firm that helps corporations and governments manage threats posed by terrorism and money laundering. Mr. Johnson works with US military commands in scripting terrorism exercises, briefs foreign governments on a regular basis on terrorist trends, and conducts undercover investigations on product counterfeiting and smuggling.
Mr. Johnson, who worked previously with the Central Intelligence Agency and U.S. State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism, is a recognized expert in the fields of terrorism, aviation security, crisis and risk management.
Mr. Johnson has analyzed terrorist incidents for a variety of media including the Jim Lehrer News Hour, National Public Radio, ABC's Nightline, NBC's Today Show, the New York Times, CNN, Fox News, and the BBC. Mr. Johnson has authored several articles for publications, including Security Management Magazine, the New York Times, and The Los Angeles Times. He has lectured on terrorism and aviation security around the world, including the Center for Research and Strategic Studies at the Ecole Polytechnique in Paris, France. He represented the U.S. Government at the July 1996 OSCE Terrorism Conference in Vienna, Austria.
From 1989 until October 1993, Larry Johnson served as a Deputy Director in the U.S. State Department’s Office of Counter Terrorism. He managed crisis response operations for terrorist incidents throughout the world and he helped organize and direct the US Government’s debriefing of US citizens held in Kuwait and Iraq, which provided vital intelligence on Iraqi operations following the 1990 invasion of Kuwait. Mr. Johnson also participated in the investigation of the terrorist bombing of Pan Am 103. Under Mr. Johnson’s leadership the U.S. airlines and pilots agreed to match the US Government’s two million-dollar reward.
From 1985 through September 1989 Mr. Johnson worked for the Central Intelligence Agency. During his distinguished career, he received training in paramilitary operations, worked in the Directorate of Operations, served in the CIA’s Operation’s Center, and established himself as a prolific analyst in the Directorate of Intelligence. In his final year with the CIA he received two Exceptional Performance Awards.
Mr. Johnson is a member of the American Society for Industrial Security. He taught at The American University’s School of International Service (1979-1983) while working on a Ph.D. in political science. He has a M.S. degree in Community Development from the University of Missouri (1978), where he also received his B.S. degree in Sociology, graduating Cum Laude and Phi Beta Kappa in 1976.



now...repeat after me:

KARL ROVE AND THE WHITEHOUSE KNEW A COVERT CIA AGENT WAS ABOUT TO BE OUTED AND DID NOTHING ABOUT IT!

 
at 1:45 PM, February 19, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

FORGET THE GOP TALKING POINTS. HOW MANY LIES WILL YOU KEEP BELIEVING? THERE WERE NO WMDS, IRAQ DIDN'T HAVE TIES TO AL QAEDA AND VALERIE PLAME WAS COVERT:



On the May 1, 2006, Monday evening Chris Matthews' Hardball, "MSNBC correspondent David Shuster confirmed what RAW STORY first reported in February: that outed CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson was working on Iran at the time she was outed" in July 2003 as a CIA covert operative by Robert Novak (see below). [5] See MSNBC video links posted by Crooks and Liars and Brad Blog.

"Intelligence sources say Valerie Wilson was part of an operation three years ago tracking the proliferation of nuclear weapons material into Iran. And the sources allege that when Mrs. Wilson's cover was blown, the Administration's ability to track Iran's nuclear ambitions was damaged as well." [6]
Steven C. Clemons wrote April 25, 2006, in The Washington Note:

"According to some inside the intel arena, Valerie Wilson's work had a lot to do with monitoring Iran's nuclear weapons appetite and capabilities and possibly helped feed Iran nuclear technology junk that could distract and complicate Iran's weapons program efforts. If true, this is quite consistent with the Iran Chapter" in James Risen's new book, State of War: The Secret History of the C.I.A. and the Bush Administration, Free Press (January 3, 2006) ISBN 0743270665.
"But if this account of Plame-Wilson's activities is true, those who exposed Valerie Plame Wilson helped undermine American national security in much more major ways that haven't yet been disclosed."

-snip
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Valerie_Plame

DID YOU READ THAT? SHE WAS WORKING ON IRAN. HMMH...WHERE IS THE bush WAR MACHINE DIRECTING THEIR ATTENTION NOW? GUESS MRS WILSON WAS GETTING IN THE WAY OF THE TRUTH.

 
at 2:52 PM, February 19, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

reading schmidts speech, its clear that the real losers in the last eletion are district 2. this woman is not capable of rational thought. thousands are dying, billions are being wasted, al qaeda (i don't spend a lot of time worrying about him) has regrouped and all these neocons can do is weave a net of lies and distortions.

had enough? i have, impeach any (R) that is out there.

 
at 4:51 PM, February 19, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"at 1:07 PM, February 19, 2007 TNP said... Otherwise, no one will take you seriously...."

Typical wRong wingnut whacko spewing the elephant dung propaganda !

When the wRong wingnut cronies don't like the message they attempt to shoot the messenger !

The Plame truth: we all agree with anon, seriously !

TNP is:

PATHETIC !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2007 !

 
at 9:12 PM, February 19, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

my dearest jean:

tonight the only thing that embarrasses our brave men and women in uniform is that a short sighted, hateful moron like you was elected to a distinguished office. do the right thing and resign before you are impeached for stupidity.

with all due respect,

an individual who fails to understand why you were ever elected.

 
at 12:28 PM, February 20, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous at 9:12 am, 2/19, Congresswoman Jean Schmidt was elected four times in a 17-month period from June, 2005, to November, 2006. Her election achievements included victories over Patrick DeWine, Tom Brinkman,
Bob McEwen (twice), Paul Hackett and Victoria Wulsin. If you can't understand why, if you think she's not qualified to represent the Second Ohio Congressional District, then get your butt out the door and work to see if you can get her defeated in 2008. If you're not willing to do the work to elect whoever her opponent is in 2008, then you have no legitimate justification for whining about her election successes, let alone her intelligence.

 
at 2:33 PM, February 20, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

usefullidiot said...
Everyone in certain dinner party/coctail party crowds in Vienna and McClean Va. knew ...

WRONG:

Wed, Oct 26, 2005 7:00pm EST

NY Times omitted Plame neighbors' statements that they didn't know she worked for CIA; Drudge regurgitated baseless report that they did

In an October 26 article about the investigation into the alleged leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity, The New York Times reported that FBI agents questioned Plame's neighbors in an effort "to determine whether it was commonly known that she was a C.I.A. officer." But unlike The Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the Associated Press, and Reuters, New York Times reporters Richard W. Stevenson and Anne E. Kornblut did not report that Plame's neighbors told investigators that they had not known before syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak's July 14, 2003, column that Plame worked for the CIA. The New York Times' omission is particularly odd, given that the newspaper ran an article July 5 devoted to the very question of the extent to which Plame's affiliation with the CIA had been known.

Also on October 26, the Drudge Report quoted from a three-month-old Washington Times article to baselessly suggest that "[m]ost of her [Plame's] neighbors and friends knew that she was a CIA employee." As Media Matters for America noted at the time, the article mentioned only one of Plame's neighbors by name: David Tillotson, who told The Washington Times that he "absolutely didn't know" Plame worked for the CIA. Instead, the Washington Times article relied upon the word of Fred Rustmann, a former CIA agent who had left the agency in 1990, had supervised Plame for a year early in her career, and was not her neighbor.

From the October 26 New York Times article by Richard W. Stevenson and Anne E. Kornblut:

In a sign that the prosecutor is continuing to build a case that Ms. Wilson's covert status was ended when she was named in Mr. Novak's column, F.B.I. agents questioned neighbors of the Wilsons in northwest Washington in the last few days, seeking to determine whether it was commonly known that she was a C.I.A. officer, a person involved in the case said. Ms. Wilson was identified in Mr. Novak's column by her maiden name, Valerie Plame.

As the Los Angeles Times noted in its October 26 article, "Critics of the leak investigation have said it was an open secret that Plame worked for the CIA." But the Los Angeles Times added that "neighbors contacted by The Times said they told the FBI agents that they had no idea of her agency life":
-snip
http://mediamatters.org/items/200510260005

LISTEN, WE'VE ALL BEEN LIED TO BY THIS ADMINISTRATION. IT'S HARD TO BELIEVE THAT AN ADMINISTRATION WOULD LIE US INTO WAR, BUT THEY DID. IT'S ALSO HARD TO BELIEVE THAT AN ADMINISTATION WOULD OUT A COVERT CIA AGENT WORKING FOR A CIA FRONT BUSINESS (BREWSTER JENNINGS) FOR POLITICAL REASONS BUT LOOKS LIKE THEY DID THAT AS WELL. RESEARCH FOR YOURSELF.

 
at 10:37 PM, February 20, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

RESEARCH IT FOR YOURSELF:

The Bush Family's War Profiteering

Written by Administrator
Thursday, 24 February 2005

The extent of Iraq contracts going to corporations which involve members of President George W. Bush's family is widespread and extensive involving hundreds of millions of dollars. Often these firms receive contracts where the corporations have no expertise and certainly the Bush family members have no expertise or experience in these areas. It is a world not of know how but of know who, marinated in campaign contributions. It seems like Bush family and friends are trading on their relationship to the President. The matrix of government contracts and Bush related corporations invites further investigation by the media and Congress - inquiries that are long overdue.

Below are examples of Bush Family members who have profited from the war and occupation of Iraq. These issues have not been examined or reported by the mainstream media.

Neil Mallon Bush the younger brother of the President, infamous for his involvement in the Silverado S and L scandal, has been hired by Crest Investment Company as a consultant for $60,000 per year to assist with their efforts to serve as a middleman to advise other companies that seek taxpayer-financed business in Iraq. Working with Crest puts Neil Bush at the center of multiple organizations profiting from the war and occupation in close alliance with long-term Bush Family allies.

SNIP...

William H.T. ("Bucky") Bush, an uncle of George W. Bush, joined the board of directors of the St. Louis based company Engineered Support Systems in March 2000. (See: http://www.engineeredsupport.com /) Bucky Bush was one the Bush “Pioneers,” the campaign contributors who raised more than $100,000 in the 2000 presidential election. Engineered Support Systems has three areas: light military support equipment, heavy military support equipment, and electronics/automation systems. Since 2000, following the presidential election and the 9-11 attacks, the company's federal contracts, revenues and its stock value have all gone up. Engineered Support Systems has been in the top 100 contractors with the DoD since 2001. It’s contracts with the U.S. military have totaled over $1 billion.

SNIP...

William H.T. Bush is also a trustee for the investment firm Lord Abbott, one of Halliburton's top 10 shareholders and also a top-ten mutual fund holder in Halliburton, which has obtained prime contracts in Iraq. Vice President Cheney, the former CEO of Halliburton, still has between $18 million and $87 million invested through Vanguard, another top-ten holder in Halliburton stock.

SNIP...

Marvin P. Bush, the youngest brother of George W. Bush, shares an interest in federal contracts held by companies in his firm's portfolio. Marvin Bush is also an adviser at HCC Insurance, formerly called the Houston Casualty Company, one of the biggest insurance carriers for the World Trade Center. Bush was a director at HCC, which has benefited financially from the 9-11 insurance bailout legislation passed by Congress at the instigation of the White House. The departure of Marvin from the HCC board was announced the same day, November 22, 2002, as the passage of the bill.

CONTINUED...

http://www.democracyrising.us/content/view/57/81 /

 
at 5:56 AM, February 21, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

to at 2:33 PM, February 20, 2007 Anonymous:

don't confuse people with the facts. if they saw it on drudge or heard it on faux then it must be true.

 
at 5:59 AM, February 21, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

to tnp:

i did work to defeat schmidt in the last election. in the end fears, smears, and queers beat out a good person.

and there's always that question of election fraud that makes her smell real bad...

 
at 9:53 AM, February 21, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous at 5:59 am, 2/21, as I understand the huge differences between the ultra-liberal Victoria Wulsin and the pro-family, pro-life Congresswoman Jean Schmidt, the "queers," as you put it, all voted for Wulsin.

And there was no "election fraud," of course. The two reprimands Congresswoman Jean Schmidt's campaign received from the OEC had to do with uncorrected errors on her campaign website. Yep, there was little excuse for either error, but neither involved "election fraud," and neither, quite frankly, amounted to a bloody hill of beans, unless a Democrat kool-aid drinker, like you, is looking for some way to spin something relatively trivial into something earth-shattering.

 
at 10:08 PM, February 21, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Her election achievements included victories over Patrick DeWine, Tom Brinkman,
Bob McEwen (twice), Paul Hackett and Victoria Wulsin"

Are you still going on about that?!?!?!

It is like Joe Torre bragging about the Yankees beating my son's little league team 3-2. Any decent candidate would have wiped the floor with Wulsin (even allowing for the political climate), not won by 1%.

TNP, take you medication and go to bed. You need a good long rest to clear your jumbled little head.

 
at 6:13 AM, February 22, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

reading tnp's post is a good reminder that stupid people don't know they are stupid.

how can anyone with a seedling of intelligence believe that:

- only conservatives are pro-life
- only conservatives are pro-family
- democrats are all queers
- democrats drink kool-aid.
- republican election theft is a trival issue.

whats wrong with this picture?

 
at 10:38 AM, February 22, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymouses at 10:28 pm, 2/21 and 6:13 am, 2/22, it's always interesting confronting you card-carrying members of the Jackass party. You guys derive all kinds of clairvoyant messages about this or that commenter that clearly demonstrate the parallel universe you folks live and think in. If either of you are not Dems, forgive the insult, but it was a logical mistake since both of you are writing like libs--you know, cynical, jaded, claiming omniscience, that sort of thing. As usual, I'm bored with your puerile nonsense. Talk to yourselves.

 
at 7:22 PM, February 22, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"You guys derive all kinds of clairvoyant messages about this or that commenter that clearly demonstrate the parallel universe you folks live and think in"


Ummm...you're the one who believes in the rapture.

So yes, you and I do live in parallel universes.


Oh, and you made a comment about a typo that I made and used that as an excuse to criticize my intelligence. FYI, you shouldn't end sentences with prepositions. It smells of high school dropout.

 
at 11:03 PM, February 22, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

hmmm. there's nothing to say that mr. wells would approve of, so have a nice day tnp. see you in hell.

 
at 11:11 AM, February 28, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Excellent point, LandofGrant, but let me suggest something. BS in Bold must simply be ignored by folks like you and me. Perhaps he will just go away, like a mangy, homeless cat that you refuse to feed. The ding-a-ling seems to feed on causing irritation and aggravation. I do hope he continues to post his irrational junk, because he persists in claiming he's a member of the Jackass party, and who wants to be identified with such a dip? But I've decided to utterly disregard anything he writes. His swill is irrelevant. Thanks for your comment.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck