*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Probable cause found against Pepper

About two hours after it ruled against Hamilton County Commissioner Phil Heimlich, a 4-0 panel of the Ohio Elections Commission found probable cause today that his Democratic challenger, David Pepper, made false statements in radio and television ads.

A full commission hearing is set for Monday to consider evidence in the dual complaints.

Heimlich's campaign manager, Robert Seddon, complained that Pepper's campaign, knowingly and with reckless disregard of the truth, lied to voters about how many county prisoners have been released early and how $224 million was spent regarding children's services. The ads accused Heimlich of failing to act or misspending money taxpayer money.

The elections commission dismissed a third claim against Pepper involving a statement about tax benefits to East Side homeowners.

Donald Brey, a Columbus attorney representing Heimlich, said the state completed its audit of Job & Family Service spending in late September, and the Pepper ads should have reflected the fact that the county was not blamed for misspent money. "They found no fraud. They found no shell game," Brey said.

Letting people out of jail early and saying Heimlich did it is a false statement, Brey said.

But Daniel McCarthy, a Cincinnati attorney representing Pepper, said the audit of children's services spending is ongoing so no final determination has been made about who is fully to blame. Overcrowding at the county jail and spending problems at children's services both happened on Heimlich's watch, according to McCarthy, so the ads are accurate.

"The Hamilton County commissioners control the purse strings" at the jail, McCarthy said. "They could have prevented this."


2 Comments:

at 9:06 PM, November 01, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jon- I'm confused here. After ruling against Heimlich - what did they rule against Heimlich - I don't get it.
Actually , I don't get much of this - could you please update with what the complaint is about Heimlich, the complaint regarding the East Side - I think I understand the children's services compalint.
By the way, When the heck did JFS say there was no shell game? I don't remeber that. Was that an after thought directed by the Republican administration?

 
at 9:09 PM, November 01, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whoops, Jon, sorry - I didn't see it under the other post -- thanks

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck