Pepper becomes the $1 million man
Councilman David Pepper loaned his campaign committee $100,000 last week, putting him on pace to spend more than $1 million in his bid for Cincinnati mayor.
His opponent, state Sen. Mark Mallory, has raised $353,283 -- including $61,000 in personal loans to his committee. Pepper's total available to spend in the campaign, including loans, is $1,069,498.
Pepper's $100,000 loan came Oct. 17 -- the same day his campaign paid for $100,000 in television ads. A new 15-second ad attacking Mallory's record on crime made its debut Thursday.
But Pepper, already breaking all records for fund-raising by a candidate for Cincinnati office, said the loan and the television buy weren't connected. "With $120,000 worth of special interest money coming in from Columbus, I needed to give $100,000 just to keep up," Pepper said, referring to the Service Employees International Union's campaign in favor of Mallory.
Individuals can contribute up to $1,000 to city candidates. But Pepper is taking advantage of the provision that allows contributors to give another $1,000 to candidates who pass the primary. His latest campaign finance reports contain 139 contributors giving $1,000 -- many of whom already gave $1,000 before the primary.
The latest numbers come from campaign finance reports filed Thursday with the Hamilton County Board of Elections.
Candidates for City Council also filed. Their fund-raising totals in the 2005 election cycle to date:
Candidate | Total | |
Jeff Berding (D) | $248,850 | |
John Cranley (D) | $187,671 | |
Chris Bortz (C) | $182,227 | |
David C. Crowley (D) | $151,751 | |
Chris Monzel (R) | $143,319 | |
Leslie Ghiz (R) | $141,723 | |
Jim Tarbell (C) | $68,790 | |
Laketa Cole (D) | $68,209 | |
Christopher Smitherman (C) | $55,940 | |
Damon Lynch III (D) | $35,948 | |
Sam Malone (R) | $35,615 | |
John Eby (R) | $31,840 | |
Samantha Herd (D) | $25,582 | |
Nick Spencer (C) | $23,358 | |
Eve Bolton (D) | $22,081 | |
Cecil Thomas (D) | $20,388 | |
Gerry Kraus (I) | $19,952 | |
Wendell P. Young (D) | $4,190 | |
Robert Wilking (I) | $4,000 | |
Robert Wilson (I) | $1,821 | |
Bill Barron (I) | $360 |
Candidates for Cincinnati Board of Education:
Candidate | Total | |
Susan Cranley | $73,877 | |
Harriet Russell | $39,475 | |
Eileen Cooper Reed | $36,960 | |
Melanie Bates | $33,650 | |
William Haase | $5,255 | |
Catherine Ingram | $0 |
Those numbers include money raised for the entire 2005 campaign cycle, but do not include loans or non-cash contributions.
12 Comments:
This just confirms what we already we knew about David Pepper: he's trying to buy the mayor's office. He has over $1 million, three times as much as Mark Mallory, and Pepper has the nerve to whine about "special interest" money?
If the fact that Pepper's trying to buy the mayor's office isn't bad enough, it is terribly distressing that Pepper considers SEIU--one of the most progressive, staunchest defenders of low-wage workers--a special interest group. Coming from the "million dollar baby," that's a joke.
Choosing a mayor is about one thing: leadership. Mallory has it now. Pepper may have it--in about 10 years.
Mr. Pibb
What I find even more disinteresting, is how biased The Enquirer has been throughout this whole race (at least since Pepper demanded Korte's dismissal over the Flag-Burning Blog).
The Enquirer has been pumpin Pepper since day one.
Money begets money!
I wish I could write myself a check for $100,000.
Hell, I can't even write one to myself for $1,000.
Calling unions "special interests" sounds an awful lot like the Governator. Not surprising, given David's corporate whores writing checks from out in California are the same writing checks to like-minded Republicans out there, too.
I'm a Republican. David Pepper makes me sick. He is NOT the best candidate for Mayor, but will quite literally BUY his way into being our Mayor. He doesn't have the skills, savvy, or understanding of regular people to serve as Mayor of our fine city. Mark Mallory at leasts understands the struggles of ordinary people. David Pepper doesn't have $100,000 on his own. Do people understand that? He's 34-35 years old and works as an attorney in a firm that probably pays him a low 6 figure salary. He is not in a position to spend $100,000 on a political campaign. This is INHERITED wealth for the little silver-spooner. This is his Mommy & Daddy's money. As a clerk for Nathaniel Jones, he made a miniscule salary. His work at the firm can only be part-time. This money is NOT his, it's family money. Good for his family--bad for us. Another spoiled rich kid in politics with no understanding of real people's concerns...
Pepper becomes the $1 million sell out!"
David Privatization has a million strings attached and the nerve to talk about keeping up with Mallory. He can't keep up in a debate, so it shouldn't suprise anyone that he's doing what he does best, sell out the taxpaer. Shame on you David, and shame on you Enquirer.
This is the most biased paper in town!
Wow! No Reportee Korte, if I didn't know better, I'd think you were a real reporter.
You didn't add the reports together this time and it involed something other than watching tv. Keep up the good work Jayson.
To O Felix Culpa: yeah, Mallory growing up on in the West End is some privileged existence. Clearly every bit as privileged as WYOMING!!
Congrats on being an SEIU member. Sorry you're so bitter that your union supports candidates who support SEIU's goal of organizing workplaces.
Mallory has SEIU's support because he supports organized labor. Pepper has his millions and the Enquirer's support because he supports outsourcing union jobs to non-union shops. I'm not sure why any union member--particularly an SEIU member--would even consider supporting Pepper.
Mr. Pibb
We in Cincinnati are privelidged to be able to tell all our friends, "We have the finest politicians money can buy, poorest newspapers, but finest politicians"
David Pepper will spend $1,069,498 to be elected to an office that will pay him $440,000 over four years. Is this guy stupid or is there hidden compensation coming from behind the scenes? What are the sources?
mark mallory is certainly not exempt from privilege & influence.
his father, william sr., is the political power in the west end. he's the force behind the laurel court & genesis developments, e.g. he makes things happen in that neighborhood.
in columbus, mallory votes as he's told by lobbyists stan aronoff & dick finan (and father). their endorsements are part of the "kingmaker" process.
if mallory is elected, we'll see plenty of political puppeteering (and little leadership) at city hall.
mallory is the candidate who's truly "owned".
congrats to the enquirer for making the proper distinctions in sunday's endorsement editorial.
thanks O.F.C. for infusing fact & reason to this thread....mr. pibb et al., your proletariat assumptions are boring & baseless.
donny shacks
I believe I have more then $360.00 I should be somewhere in the middle of these names,you should check all this out again(all the figures)
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.
<< Home