Schmidt's "24 hours to victory" tour
If you're looking for Jean Schmidt on Monday...
Will post schedules as they come in.
From the Schmidt campaign:
JEAN SCHMIDT TO TRAVEL ACROSS SOUTHERN OHIO
24 HOURS TO VICTORY BUS TOUR
Cincinnati, OH – Jean Schmidt will travel across the Second Congressional District on Monday, November 6, 2006 to rally with her volunteers, supporters and friends. The “24 Hours to Victory Bus Tour” will make a stop in each of the seven counties she represents, which include Adams, Brown, Clermont, Hamilton, Pike, Scioto and Warren counties.
“With just 24 hours to go until Election day, this is a wonderful opportunity to reach out to my supporters and friends across Southern Ohio to thank them for their unwavering support, “said Schmidt. “Thanks to their hard work, we’re looking forward to celebrating a victory on Tuesday night.” Press interested in covering the events should contact Matt Perin at 513-686-0430.
Schmidt for Congress – 24 Hours to Victory Bus Tour
Itinerary
8:00 am: Tour Bus departs from Clermont County Republican Headquarters (Batavia, Ohio)
197 E. Main St. Batavia, OH
9:30 am: Tour Bus arrives at Scioto County Republican Headquarters (Portsmouth, Ohio)
915 7th St. Portsmouth, OH
11:00am: Tour Bus arrives at Diner 23 for Rally in Waverly, Ohio.
300 W. Emmitt Ave Waverly, OH
12:30 pm: Tour Bus arrives at Adams County Courthouse Square for Rally.
110 W Main St. West Union, OH
2:00 pm: Tour Bus arrives at Brown County Administration Building for meet and greet
800 Mount Orab Pike Georgetown, OH
3:15 pm: Tour Bus arrives in Mt. Orab – for quick stop at local businesses along
32 and 68 interchange.
5:00 pm: Arrive at Warren County Republican Headquarters
30 W. Main Street Lebanon, OH
5:45 pm: Depart for Kenwood, Ohio.
6:30 pm: Arrive at Campaign Headquarters in Kenwood for rally with volunteers
8280 Montgomery Rd. Suite 204 Cincinnati, OH
8: 00 pm: Arrive at Clermont County Republican Headquarters for Rally.
197 E. Main St. Batavia, OH
18 Comments:
at 6:24 PM, November 04, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 6:28 PM, November 04, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 7:34 PM, November 04, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 8:30 PM, November 04, 2006 
JohnDWoodSr said...
-
-
at 11:16 PM, November 04, 2006 
natenoy said...
-
-
at 12:53 AM, November 05, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 1:05 AM, November 05, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 7:49 AM, November 05, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 1:55 PM, November 05, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 2:41 PM, November 05, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 2:45 PM, November 05, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 2:46 PM, November 05, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 3:29 PM, November 05, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 6:27 PM, November 05, 2006 
Brah Coon said...
-
-
at 6:47 PM, November 05, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 8:11 PM, November 05, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 9:34 PM, November 05, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
at 10:19 AM, November 06, 2006 
Anonymous said...
-
-
Post a Comment*Will Jean be discussing what she has accomplished since being elected to congress? I have yet to hear Jean discuss any accomplishments.
When in Batavia, Jean will be making a stop at UC Clermont to discuss how she plans on taking some courses to finish her teaching degree. Her goal is to start in January, as she will be unemployed.
mean jean will be stopping in Pike county to dump some nuclear waste !
I heard it will be hidden among some Ford transmissions that won't be built !
PATHETIC !
HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2006 !
6:28 anonymous--Jean Schmidt won't be unemployed for long. She's going into acting as soon as she loses the election. In fact, she has already been offered the starring role in a new Fox series to be called BATTLEAX GALACTICA. They used footage of her attack on John Murtha as a screen test.
I hope she enjoys seeing all of my yard signs across the district.
Nate
What yard signs Nate? Your an absolute idiot. Save your marriage.....
How could one respect Jean Schmidt who refused to debate Dr. Wulsin, her opponent?
And, yes, I saw my first Nate Noy sign today, at the exit of I-71 and Montgomery Rd. Too late, I have already voted.
Yawn...
Newly released schmidt:
YOU TUBE !
Newly released:
schmidt audio !
Jean can run, but she can't hide.
Stand up and fight. Or Cut 'N Run.
Still waiting for Jean to debate.
Jean can run, but she can't hide.
Stand up and fight. Or Cut 'N Run.
Still waiting for Jean to debate.
I wudda thought Marathon Jean would run from place to place. Now I find out she's riding in a political cortege with a diesel bus trailing a rider-less Cadillac Escalade.
Sic fugit inliberale Jean.
Ms. Schimdt...
DENOUNCE THIS BLOG --> http://alter-or-abolish.blogspot.com/
DENUNCIATION! So Easy a Caveman Can Do It!
Jean,
When you get here, I'm going to offer you a glass of drinking water from right outside the Piketon plant and a sealed white envelope with "DO NOT OPEN UNTIL WEDNESDAY NOVEMEBER 8th" written on it.
Si
Looks like the real conservatives are smarter than Jean and Chabot when it comes to Iraq...
November 20, 2006 Issue
The American Conservative
GOP Must Go
Next week Americans will vote for candidates who have spent much of their campaigns addressing state and local issues. But no future historian will linger over the ideas put forth for improving schools or directing funds to highway projects.
The meaning of this election will be interpreted in one of two ways: the American people endorsed the Bush presidency or they did what they could to repudiate it. Such an interpretation will be simplistic, even unfairly so. Nevertheless, the fact that will matter is the raw number of Republicans and Democrats elected to the House and Senate.
It should surprise few readers that we think a vote that is seen—in America and the world at large—as a decisive “No” vote on the Bush presidency is the best outcome. We need not dwell on George W. Bush’s failed effort to jam a poorly disguised amnesty for illegal aliens through Congress or the assaults on the Constitution carried out under the pretext of fighting terrorism or his administration’s endorsement of torture. Faced on Sept. 11, 2001 with a great challenge, President Bush made little effort to understand who had attacked us and why—thus ignoring the prerequisite for crafting an effective response. He seemingly did not want to find out, and he had staffed his national-security team with people who either did not want to know or were committed to a prefabricated answer.
As a consequence, he rushed America into a war against Iraq, a war we are now losing and cannot win, one that has done far more to strengthen Islamist terrorists than anything they could possibly have done for themselves. Bush’s decision to seize Iraq will almost surely leave behind a broken state divided into warring ethnic enclaves, with hundreds of thousands killed and maimed and thousands more thirsting for revenge against the country that crossed the ocean to attack them. The invasion failed at every level: if securing Israel was part of the administration’s calculation—as the record suggests it was for several of his top aides—the result is also clear: the strengthening of Iran’s hand in the Persian Gulf, with a reach up to Israel’s northern border, and the elimination of the most powerful Arab state that might stem Iranian regional hegemony.
The war will continue as long as Bush is in office, for no other reason than the feckless president can’t face the embarrassment of admitting defeat. The chain of events is not complete: Bush, having learned little from his mistakes, may yet seek to embroil America in new wars against Iran and Syria.
Meanwhile, America’s image in the world, its capacity to persuade others that its interests are common interests, is lower than it has been in memory. All over the world people look at Bush and yearn for this country—which once symbolized hope and justice—to be humbled. The professionals in the Bush administration (and there are some) realize the damage his presidency has done to American prestige and diplomacy. But there is not much they can do.
There may be little Americans can do to atone for this presidency, which will stain our country’s reputation for a long time. But the process of recovering our good name must begin somewhere, and the logical place is in the voting booth this Nov. 7. If we are fortunate, we can produce a result that is seen—in Washington, in Peoria, and in world capitals from Prague to Kuala Lumpur—as a repudiation of George W. Bush and the war of aggression he launched against Iraq.
We have no illusions that a Democratic majority would be able to reverse Bush’s policies, even if they had a plan to. We are aware that on a host of issues the Democrats are further from TAC’s positions than the Republicans are. The House members who blocked the Bush amnesty initiative are overwhelmingly Republican. But immigration has not played out in an entirely partisan manner this electoral season: in many races the Democrat has been more conservative than the open-borders, Big Business Republican. A Democratic House and Senate is, in our view, a risk immigration reformers should be willing to take. We can’t conceive of a newly elected Democrat in a swing district who would immediately alienate his constituency by voting for amnesty. We simply don’t believe a Democratic majority would give the Republicans such an easy route to return to power. Indeed, we anticipate that Democratic office holders will follow the polls on immigration just as Republicans have, and all the popular momentum is towards greater border enforcement.
On Nov. 7, the world will be watching as we go to the polls, seeking to ascertain whether the American people have the wisdom to try to correct a disastrous course. Posterity will note too if their collective decision is one that captured the attention of historians—that of a people voting, again and again, to endorse a leader taking a country in a catastrophic direction. The choice is in our hands.
November 20, 2006 Issue
Could this investigation be the reason Wulsin pulled her ad where she pretended to be a doctor?
This morning, Dr. Robert Baratz, on behalf of the National Council Against Health Fraud, requested that the State Medical Board of Ohio conduct an investigation into the activities of Dr. Victoria Wells (Wulsin)—who is also in the final week of a campaign against Republican incumbent Jean Schmidt in the race for second congressional district seat.
….. Baratz’s letter to the medical board included the following:
Activities which we feel merit discipline include, but are not limited to:
Participation in unsupervised, unapproved, and dangerous experiments involving human beings where serious diseases were left untreated akin to the notorious Tuskegee experiments. Wells participated with the Heimlich Institute, Henry Heimlich, The Deaconess Associations of Cincinnati, and other parties in these experiments. Further, when Wells became aware of the nature of these deviant and immoral acts she failed to reveal them to proper authorities, and thus became complicit in them. Numerous journalistic reports and release of a report on this work by Wells herself document her involvement and the experiments themselves. The experiments violate 21 CFR 50 and 56 and 45 CFR 46 and appear to involve lack of informed consent, use of unapproved biological agents, and other unprofessional conduct.
After Wells’ activities became known, she altered the records of her report in an attempt to mislead the public as to her true role.
Recently television advertising depicts Wells in a laboratory coat with a stethoscope in a medical facility suggesting to the public she is a practicing physician. In response to interviews and questions conducted by the Cincinnati Enquirer on October 20, 2006 Wells admitted she has not seen a patient in approximately five years “My most recent clinical work was at the Health Resource Center in Over-the-Rhine from 1998 to 2001.”
The so-called Heimlich Malariotherapy experiments involve the injection of malarial parasites into humans for the alleged treatment of cancer, Lyme disease, and HIV infection. They have been disclaimed by numerous medical authorities, including the Centers for Disease Control, and exposed by the Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and numerous other media.
Baratz has asked for this investigation under Section 4731.22 of the Ohio Revised Code.
Anonymous said...
Could this investigation be the reason Wulsin pulled her ad where she pretended to be a doctor?
Did you post the above message Si?
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.
<< Home