Debate report
From the Columbus bureau
Republican candidate Ken Blackwell’s charges against Democrat Ted Strickland won’t have much punch unless Blackwell decides to put them in television ads.
Blackwell was noncommittal following the debate when asked if he intended to devote his last weeks’ television time to the sex issues he hurled at Strickland during their fourth and final debate Monday night.
The charges blew all the other issues off the agenda as Blackwell must have hoped they would. In political jargon, Blackwell’s claims are referred to as an “October surprise.”
Although the charges are old and have been raised and discounted in Strickland’s previous campaigns for Congress and in this year’s gubernatorial primary campaign, they seemed to gain more traction in the venue Blackwell chose.
Blackwell criticized Strickland for not doing background checks on his staffers and coddling to a pro-pedophilia group in one of his votes in Congress.
Although Blackwell’s charges gave reporters a fresh angle on what had become routine debates between the two men, most saw it, as Strickland’s running mate, Lee Fisher said, “Mr. Blackwell heaved a Hail Mary tonight, and the pass was incomplete."
But the voters could prove the press wrong and, in an environment drenching of the page-scandal in D.C., take Blackwell’s allegations to heart and turnaround Blackwell’s months-long double digit deficit in the polls.
No one in Ohio has been more successful in generating support and action from the religious right than Blackwell. Prior to the debate, it was speculated that some of the right would stay home on Election Day because of the morass their party seemed to be in on both the national and state levels. Blackwell may have re-energized them again.
But last night’s and this morning’s news reports won’t carry Blackwell into the winner’s column unless he hammers the messages home with paid media.
However, if some of the polls hold true, Blackwell may be too late because voters have become numbed to all of the negative political ads cluttering the air and cable waves.
Either way Blackwell goes has its risks.
In Monday’s debate, Blackwell claimed that Strickland had, in the late 1990’s, a staffer who was charged with exposing himself to children and that Strickland voted “Present” when a resolution condemning pedophilia came before him in Congress.
Strickland said that he could not support the resolution because it said that a child who had been sexually abused could not have healthy relationships as an adult.
"I believe in the power of God," Strickland, a psychologist, said. "Even if psychologists and psychiatrists can't help such a child, I believe God can help such a child overcome such abuses."
Blackwell claimed that Strickland’s vote of “Present” when the resolution was put forward was applauded by the North American Man/Boy Love Association.
Strickland claimed that he had never been applauded by the association and that Blackwell seemed to know more about the charges against his staff and NAMBLA than Strickland did.
7 Comments:
It's too bad the corporate media shut out the only candidates that wanted to talk about real issues. Once again you've done a great disservice to your community.
Libertarian Bill Peirce must look real good if you're a Republican right now and Green Bob Fitrakis must look good to Dems.
You act as the gate keepers of democracy and then you cover the last debate like this.
Shame on You!!!
Anyone else thinks this reads more like a campaign strategy memo than an unbiased story?
"Ok, Kenny. Hammer him away on the NAMBLA stuff. It's crap, but if you keep lying, you'll get 'em out for you."
I would think that the Republican Nat'l Committee would have a hard time supporting such an attack, as it would only keep alive the issues that are a few months old in their party versus some from 12 years ago for an opponent.
If Blackwell was trying to firm up his support from the religous right, Strickland handled it perfectly in his response about God being able to do things that psychologists and psychiatrists can't.
This will be a footnote in a landslide victory for Strickland.
The GOP has done everything possible to divert attention away from their corruption scandals. Look now who is swept up in an aspect of the Abramoff scandal:
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/10/16/mehlman_abramoff/print.html
Abramoff's "rock star"
An e-mail trail suggests that current Republican National Committee head Ken Mehlman was lobbyist Jack Abramoff's go-to guy in the White House.
By Mark Benjamin
Oct. 16, 2006 | Ken Mehlman, head of the Republican Party, insists he doesn't have a Jack Abramoff problem. "Everything I did was above board and consistent with the rules," Mehlman told reporters this month about his work in the White House during President Bush's first term, when the now-disgraced super-lobbyist was hustling Washington. In fact, the Republican National Committee chairman likes to insinuate that Jack Abramoff never made much of an impression on him at all. He might have met with Abramoff or his lieutenants, Mehlman conceded to Fox News recently, but "I don't recall the specifics or the meetings."
But maybe Ken Mehlman does have an Abramoff problem. On Sept. 29, the very day the Foleygate scandal broke and sucked up most of the media oxygen, the House Committee on Government Reform released a bipartisan report on the contacts between the White House and Abramoff. The 91-page report lists 17 different Abramoff lobbying efforts directed at the White House Office of Political Affairs when Mehlman was that office's director from 2001 to 2003. But the most revealing story about Mehlman is told by the hundreds of pages of e-mails in the appendices of the report.
The e-mails show that Mehlman was not only familiar with Abramoff, but might have been his go-to man within the White House. "Everyone would appreciate it if you would contact Ken only and not others here at the WH," reads one message to Abramoff from Bush advisor Karl Rove's assistant Susan Ralston, "because they just forward it to him anyway." And a comparison of the timing of specific e-mails with the timing of specific checks written by Abramoff clients suggests what Abramoff was expected to deliver in return.
More than once, Abramoff asks for a favor, Mehlman fulfills the request, and then one of Abramoff's wealthy Indian tribe clients sends a political donation to a GOP cause. In return for a favor, Abramoff seems to have helped Mehlman with his own special project, a tight, scandal-marred Senate race in New Hampshire. On one occasion, Mehlman even appears to have arranged for the firing of a particular federal employee at Abramoff's request.
TIME TO VOTE OUT THE MOST CORRUPT PARTY IN HISTORY!
Perhaps better to leave "sex scandal issues" - alone - Ken -
Not a great conversation starter -
not for anything positive - oops!!!
isn't this a GOP news release? notice there's no reporter's name on it. must be another cut and paste job.
And people are upset about Nikki Giovanni's comments? The Blackwell campaign is desperate. And Blackwell is truly a whorish, son of a bitch.
* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.
By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.
<< Home