*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Wednesday, September 27, 2006

Tomorrow's political notebook today

Just for you Politics Extra junkies, here's the Political Notebook that will appear in tomorrow's Enquirer:

By Howard Wilkinson
Enquirer staff writer


Two Cincinnati TV stations which briefly pulled a union-sponsored ad attacking Rep. Steve Chabot put the ad back on the air Wednesday, after the union provided the stations with documentation that Chabot voted against bills increasing the minimum wage.
The 30-second TV spot was paid for by the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME).

Chabot’s campaign filed a complaint with the stations about the ad and both stations - WCPO-TV (channel 9) and WKRC-TV (channel 12) told campaign officials earlier this week they would take the ad off the air.

The ad was off the air on channel 12 Tuesday, but went back up Wednesday.

WCPO general manager Bill Fee said his station had told the Chabot campaign it would stop airing the ad Wednesday, but changed its position Tuesday night, after AFSCME officials provided the station with documents showing that its claim that Chabot had voted against minimum wage legislation was true.

Chabot, a Republican, voted this year against Democratic-sponsored bills which would have raised the minimum wage. Chabot voted for a Republican-sponsored minimum wage increase this year, as well.

Fee said that when a campaign files a formal complaint about an attack ad, the station goes through a procedure proscribed by the Federal Elections Commission where the campaign or organization paying for the ad is asked to produce evidence of its claims and the challenger is invited to produce evidence refuting the charges.

Kerry back in Ohio

Some say John Kerry might be living in the White House now if he had spent more time in Ohio, the state that gave the election to George W. Bush.

He’s making up for it now.

Next Tuesday, the Massachusetts senator will campaign in Columbus with that city’s mayor, Michael Coleman, at a Catholic church on the city’s north side. “Early voting,’’ which starts Tuesday in Ohio, will be the subject of the day.

Kerry will move on from there to the nearby campus of Ohio State University, where he will be the featured speaker at a college Democrats’ get-out-the-vote rally.

No top issue

No one issue is uppermost in the minds of Ohio voters in this fall’s statewide elections, but most voters say they will base their choices for governor and U.S. Senate on their positions on issues – as opposed to character or experience, according to a poll released Wednesday.

The top three issues cited by voters in the University of Cincinnati’s Ohio Poll were education (14 percent), the economy and jobs, including the minimum wage issue (13 percent) and taxes (12%).

The poll, conducted by UC’s Institute for Policy Research, showed that among the random sample of likely Ohio voters 63 percent said they would base their vote for governor on the candidates’ position on issues. The candidate’s character was cited by 18 percent, while the candidate’s political party would determine the vote of 10 percent and the candidate’s experience would influence another six percent.

In the U.S. Senate race, factors such as experience, political party and character were somewhat more important.

In the Senate race, 53 percent said they would base their votes on candidates’ positions on issues, while 15 percent cited character, 14 percent said experience and 14 percent said the candidate’s political party would determine their votes.

A week ago, the Ohio Poll released its finding on the head-to-head match-ups between Democrat Ted Strickland and Republican Ken Blackwell for governor and Republican incumbent Mike DeWine and Democrat Sherrod Brown for the U.S. Senate.

In that poll, conducted at the same time as the polling on what would influence voters, 50 percent said they favored Strickland, while 38 percent favored Blackwell. Independent candidate Bill Peirce polled at three percent while independent Bob Fitrakis took two percent. In the Senate race, Brown led with 51 percent to DeWine’s 47 percent.

The poll of 671 likely Ohio voters was conducted by telephone between Sept. 7 and Sept. 17. It has a margin of error of 3.8 percentage points.

Forum Monday

The Amos Project, a coalition of churches and synagogues that work on social issues, is holding a forum for state, federal and local candidates Monday night, but it is still unclear how many of them are going to show up.

Jim Wallis, a self-described “progressive evangelical’’ will moderate the forum.

Sue Morrissey of the Amos Project said invitations went out to all candidates for Ohio governor, U.S. Senate from Ohio, the 1st and 2nd congressional districts of Ohio, and Hamilton County commissioner.

As of Wednesday, only five candidates had confirmed that they will attend: Democrat Senate candidate Sherrod Brown, 1st District Democratic candidate John Cranley, 2nd District Democratic candidate Victoria Wulsin, and both county commission candidates, Republican incumbent Phil Heimlich and Democratic challenger David Pepper.

The event begins at 7 p.m. Monday at the Cintas Center on the campus of Xavier University, 1624 Herald Ave.


8 Comments:

at 5:11 PM, September 27, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

What about vic wulsin saying that since i make less than a million a year, I'm middle class? WHAT?!?!?! how out of touch is that chick?

 
at 7:29 PM, September 27, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"how out of touch is [vic wulsin]?" Anon asked at 5:11 p.m.

I think the "out of touch" has to go to our prez. If memory serves, we have to extend the term, middle class, to those making a mere $100K a year to say the middle class got a tax break under Bush.

Of course one might argue I did indeed receive a tax break of $30, the cost of one tank of gas. The community agency where I worked lost $1 million for its budget, and 13 positions had to go, of which mine was one. Those are the real cuts and breaks from this failed administration.

 
at 7:37 PM, September 27, 2006 Blogger John in Cincinnati said...

I wouldn't mind it if these Republicans like Chabot would just say, "Look, I'm rich. I started out as a teacher and worked hard to get where I am. Other folks can do the same. I'm against an increase in the minimum wage."

I disagree, but I'd give him credit for being honest. Instead he goes whining to two TV stations for running a negative ad that happens to be true.

 
at 10:12 PM, September 27, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

O.K. I listened to Cunningham. The Dr. that doesn't know her name said that middle class is someone that makes less than a million dollars a year. Out side of rich doctors in Indian Hill, who makes a million dollars a year that lives in the second district? How many of those lucky people are there? No wonder the doctor that does not know her name thinks that medicare part B should be stopped. After all according to her views the middle class is making a million dollars a year!

 
at 10:21 PM, September 27, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

More proof that republicans, and that includes Ken Blackwell, were willing to try any dirty trick to disenfranchise newly registered likely democratic voters. If you wondered whether they targeted affluent exurban (white) communities the answer would be no. And yes they paid $100 to each GOP vote challenger who was stationed at majority African American precincts.

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/060926/cgtu072.html?.v=38&printer=1

Ohio Abandons Two-Year Battle Over Voter Disenfranchisement
Tuesday September 26, 5:26 pm ET


WASHINGTON, Sept. 26 /PRNewswire/ -- The state of Ohio this week abandoned a two-year-long defense of efforts to disenfranchise 35,000 registered voters in the days leading up to the 2004 presidential election. In a victory for several Jenner & Block pro bono clients, a federal appeals court agreed to dismiss the lawsuit after Ohio conceded that it could no longer defend the 2004 actions.

The lawsuit arose just days before the November 2004 presidential election, when Republican Party leaders challenged 35,000 Ohio residents' right to vote, based solely on the return of non-forwardable, registered postcards that the party had sent to newly registered voters. The challengers claimed that the returned postcards showed that the voters were potentially trying to commit fraud by voting in precincts where they did not live. Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell ordered Ohio's 88 county boards of elections to conduct hearings on all 35,000 challenges in a three-day period.

Jenner & Block represented a group of voters who challenged the partisan officials' move on due-process grounds and sought a temporary restraining order (TRO) allowing all 35,000 voters to participate in the election. The plaintiffs represented by the Firm noted that many postcards were returned for legitimate reasons. For example, plaintiff Brian Albright had refused to accept registered mail from the Republican Party, and class member Lisa Potts was registered to vote from her mother's address in Westerville, Ohio, while she served in the United States Marine Corps at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Ohio Republican Party chair Bob Bennett eventually conceded that data- management errors had caused thousands of postcards to be returned from otherwise eligible voters, including all 5,000 challenges in Franklin County, Ohio.

The plaintiffs also pointed out that the State failed to notify the challenged voters of their hearings, and that their right to vote would thus be stripped without them even receiving notice.

In late October 2004, a federal district court granted the plaintiffs' motion for a TRO, allowing the 35,000 voters to participate in the 2004 presidential election. But months after the election, the state of Ohio appealed the order and argued that the procedures it had followed were proper.

This Monday, just two days before oral argument was scheduled to take place, the state of Ohio asked the appellate court to dismiss its appeal. In its motion to dismiss, the state for the first time agreed with the plaintiffs that the events leading up to the 2004 election were unlikely to recur and that an appeal was thus pointless.

Jenner & Block attorney Sam Hirsch, who represented the plaintiffs, said, "Our victory today is a warning shot to partisan operatives in Ohio and across the Nation: The right to vote and the right to due process prohibit last- minute maneuvers that would result in mass disenfranchisement."

The Jenner & Block team on this matter included partners Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. and Sam Hirsch, associate Brian Hauck, and former associate Aaron Bruhl, who is now an assistant professor at the University of Houston Law Center.

Hmm, the state dropped it's appeal. Blackwell embarrassed perhaps?

 
at 4:02 PM, September 28, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

If John Kerry were the one living in the White House then I would have to move.

 
at 7:24 PM, September 28, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
If John Kerry were the one living in the White House then I would have to move.


Oh, yeah because things are just peachy with one party rule. Could someone please remind me what republicans are supposed to be good for?

Well lets see it's not fiscal responsibility.

War planning? Rummy don't need no stinking plans.

Long before the United States invaded Iraq in 2003, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld forbade military strategists to develop plans for securing a postwar Iraq, the retiring commander of the Army Transportation Corps said Thursday.

In fact, said Brig. Gen. Mark Scheid, Rumsfeld said "he would fire the next person" who talked about the need for a postwar plan.

Rumsfeld did replace Gen. Eric Shinseki, the Army chief of staff in 2003, after Shinseki told Congress that hundreds of thousands of troops would be needed to secure postwar Iraq.

In fact Rumsfeld said this about the cost of the Iraq War:

The (OMB) has come up with a
number that's something under $50 billion...How much of that would be the U.S. burden, and how much would be other countries,
is an open question.

Sure inspires confidence. Not.

 
at 10:30 AM, September 29, 2006 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Will Howard be covering the Ted Strickland "Plagiarism" story that is breaking on many blog sites. If you take Ted's press release: CONGRESSMAN TED STRICKLAND JOINS “HONEST LEADERSHIP, OPEN GOVERNMENT” REFORM PACKAGE and google the “HONEST LEADERSHIP, OPEN GOVERNMENT” portion you will find many democrats using the same article. It appears that "plagiarism" is rampant in the democratic party. If you google many of Strickland's press releases you will find that he copied them.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck