*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Tuesday, July 05, 2005

Who's responsible for solving crime?


Filling in for Lincoln Ware on WDBZ today, Mayor Charlie Luken (file photo, above) gave a belated response to Hamilton County Prosecuter Joseph T. Deters' June 24 broadside putting the weight of the city's crime problem squarely on the shoulders of the mayor and City Council.

"We can debate that," Luken said. But he said Deters should also look at problems with the county's criminal justice system.

"If you would do that, you would ask yourself how does somebody like that -- 24 years old and with four violent offenses -- end up back on the street? While Mr. Deters has criticized City Council for not supporting the police, I would hope he would look at the probation and parole policies of Hamilton County and the state of Ohio," Luken said.

The back-and-forth between city and county governments on the crime issue is likely to escalate through November. It's already become a key theme in Democrat David Pepper's mayoral campaign.

While one of his opponents, Vice Mayor Alicia Reece, has focused on a reorganization within the Police Department as the solution to gang violence, Pepper has increasingly laid the problem on the doorstep of county government. Pepper advocates a citywide "Court Watch" program for neighborhoods to keep an eye on judges, tougher prosecution of gun crimes and putting more probation officers in neighborhoods. He told the neighborhood activist group Westwood Concern last week that expanding the jail would provide the single biggest boost to the city's crime-fighting efforts.

Luken also said today that he supports attempts by Hamilton County Commissioner Todd Portune to get Sheriff Simon L. Leis Jr. more involved in patrolling inside the city. "If it can be done in a coordinated way…. Why not?" Luken said, calling the sheriff's patrols in the city would be "unprecedented ... at least in my memory." (The sheriff did begin patrols around the county "campus" in 2002.)

City and county governments have only rarely been able to put aside political differences on development issues. Can the crisis of urban violence bring them together?

(Photo by Michael E. Keating/The Cincinnati Enquirer)


5 Comments:

at 1:11 AM, July 06, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who stands for treatment and education?

Say you have 100 people in a room. 10 of them are going to commit a crime. What should you do?

A. Build a jail next door
B. Build a support network to offer 100 people with education and alternaitives to crime
C. Blame police and others for crime

 
at 2:43 AM, July 06, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think it's shameful how most county official act as if they don't represent the City of Cincinnati, but merely all the other polities (cities, villages, and townships) in Hamilton County. John Dowlin used to be the worst at this, constantly speaking in terms of the "the City versus the County" despite the fact that Cincinnati is the seat of Hamilton County.

 
at 4:18 PM, July 07, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Luken has a point,

I have had three stolen cars incidents in the past couple of years in Cincinnati. The police caught the guys red handed in the first incident. But that is the end of the good news.

After appearing, at the grand jury and for trial, the prosecution made a deal with the adult thief and payment of damages was part of his probation but he never paid nor was he made to pay even though his mother had a million dollar plus settlement for the thief's brother's death (Timothy Thomas). And the judge sealed the Thomas case which told that the siblings were to get part of the settlement.

And the juvenile thief was allowed to walk. After first appearing for trial which was continued because the sheriff's deputy did not show and
then on the next trial date, the thief did not show.
Then because the prosecution failed to notify me for the third date, the thief was allowed to walk.

I will not go into the hoops that the sheriff made me go through to get my car back after incurring unneccessary towing and storage fees.

What good does it do to catch the criminals in Hamilton County?

Paul Wallpe

 
at 3:50 PM, July 11, 2005 Blogger Nathaniel Livingston Jr. said...

Wasn't there more to this blog the other day?

 
at 3:15 PM, August 04, 2005 Blogger Elderone said...

Have the people of Cincinnati given up and resigned themselves to the fact that things are always going to be this way? The endless blame is sad to see. That seems to be the only reason we elect officials. So we will have someone to blame. How about some suggestions to fix some of the problems.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck