*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

Who-Dey?


Hamilton County's commissioners met in executive session today to talk about the Cincinnati Bengals.

It initially was thought the closed-door hearing was to discuss commissioners' reluctance to pay the team almost $1 million it paid to replace its natural grass field with synthetic turf.

But it may include more than that -- based on the meeting's participants.

In addition to the county's assistant prosecutors who act as commissioners attorneys, other county employees, it included to other attorneys:

* Tom Gabelman, a private attorney the commissioners hired to help them on riverfront development issues, was set to give commissioners a presentation on the status of the federal lawsuit they filed against the Bengals and the National Football League.

That suit alleged the team and league used their monopoly powers to win a lease that was unfavorable to the public. Taxpayers are paying for Paul Brown Stadium with an increased sales tax in Hamilton County, voted in a decade ago.

* Stan Chesley, the private attorney commissioners hired to sue the Bengals and NFL.

That lawsuit has been dismissed but commissioners haven't decided if they should appeal that ruling.

Commissioner Todd Portune, who filed the suit, wants it to continue.

Commissioner Pat DeWine insists the suit is over and any appeal would be a further waste of taxpayer money.

Portune filed the suit hoping to recover money because the sales tax fund that pays for the stadium is facing a projected deficit of up about $200 million because initial projections of the sales tax revenue have fallen short.


11 Comments:

at 1:49 PM, January 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmmm.... this could change the whole dynamics of the county's fiscal issues. Is it worth the gamble to get three times the return and relieve county citizens of the biggest debt it has ever had? I think any reasoned investor would look at the odds as pretty darn good.If the commission can make a move - make a move. A small investment of county resources certainly justifies the possiblity of a huge, HUGE payout.
We deserve the effort

 
at 7:52 PM, January 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Everywhere except in S.W. Ohio courthouses there exist "fundamental fairness" !

Not, when you have wRong wingnut control !

PATHETIC !

HAD ENOUGH, VOTE DEMOCRAT 2007 !

 
at 9:40 PM, January 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is time for Mike Brown to get his due.
I hope Perry's got it right - hopefully, something's stewing....

If it's brown, flush it down!

 
at 9:52 PM, January 03, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

And Pat DeWine claims to be the fiscal watchdog?

Looks to me like he's in the pocket of the Bengals- I wonder how much in campaign contributions DeWine and Deters and the boys got, and will get, if they try their best to kill the lawsuit.

 
at 12:13 AM, January 04, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

David Pepper is wasting no time showing his hypocrisy. He spent the entire campaign criticizing Phil Heimlich for his alleged "secrecy" in how he conducted affairs for the county. He promised a new "transparency" in how he would handle county matters.

Now, not 2 days into his job he's participating in closed-door Commission meetings to conduct county business. Pepper is a hypocrite and the media should call him out for it.

 
at 12:22 PM, January 04, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Idiot - executive sessions on personnel matters, lawsuits and real estate purchases are necessarily and statutorialy exempted due to the nature of these meetings.
If a property seller finds out that the deep pockets of government are interested in buying a piece of land - what do you think will happen to the price? (Ask NKY)If the county is talking to their attorney in a client-attorney priveldge manner - what rights have we sacrificed in order to give the public a front row seat? The whole case - that's what.
GET REAL, GET AN ISSUE, OR HANG IT UP - is that the best you can do?

 
at 2:28 PM, January 04, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jeff, Phil Heimlich should thank his lucky stars every day he spends unindicted for being an accessory to the murder of Marcu Feisel.

And you, as an acitivist Repugnicant, should also thank your luck stars that there is still a Repugnicant Party for you and your right-wing hate-spewing bigoted and homophobic buddies. It won't be long before the entire Repugnicant Party is closed, padlocked, and fumigated as a criminal enterprise under the RICO statutes.

 
at 6:28 PM, January 04, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

anon 2:28
Why do you blame local republicans for marcus fiesl? i have seen you post repeatedly, but you never seem to get it off your chest -- tellus your reasoning - it might be educational.
(i admire your dedication to this young boys life and tragic death)

 
at 7:30 PM, January 04, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd like to know if there is a way to force the Bengals to leave town. Maybe the commisioners could ask that they not use the word "Cincinnati" in thier name.

 
at 7:43 PM, January 04, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:28, I guess some people come in and out of this blog.

My reasoning is very simple: Republicans were then in charge of the county government, the state government, and the federal government at the time this senseless death happened.

The Federal and state legislatures had the opportunity to fix much-needed loopholes in the foster-care system. One simple change would have been to require criminal background checks and credit checks on prospective foster parents (who, after all, receive Federal and/or state aid, administered by the county, to take these children in).

This simple rule change would have disqualified the foster monsters who got Marcus Feisel.

The problem is that such measures are opposed by groups such as Lifeway For Youth who get paid by the placement. Actually having standards for foster parents would slow down the placements, therefore it would slow down their getting paid. These outsourcing companies have taken the jobs of licensed qualified social workers who, more importantly, do not get paid by the placement.

Foster-care providers turn around and give campaign contributions to politicians who do nothing about the foster-care problem because they want to keep their own money flowing, too.

Congress could have passed a simple law requiring any agency that receives Federal funds for foster-care placements to require criminal background and credit checks.

Right now, it is harder to become a government contractor supplying paper clips (thanks to the criminal background and credit checks) than it is to become a government contractor to take care of a child who has become the government's responsibility.

Chabot, Schmidt, Boehner, all county commissioners in Hamilton Butler, WArren, and Clermont Counties, all the state reps and state senators in the 4 counties, and the last two GOP governors and attorney generals all knew this was a problem and had this suggestion presented to them.

I should know because my family and I wrote to them and talked to them about it.

To a person, every single Democrat expressed concern and wanted to change the laws.

Not a single Republican official EVER had even the courtesy to reply to our letters or to set up a meeting.

Repuglicans were in the majority the entire time this has been taking place.

They belong in jail as a result of their criminal indifference.

 
at 12:26 AM, January 05, 2007 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you for explaining your reasoning regarding the children in our foster care system and the culpability of the Republican Party.

It makes sense and you're right.

It is such a shame that elected officials are not held accountable for their actions and the impact on others. Tragic.

I wish Cranley and the Democratic Party had exposed this issue during the recent campaign. Not to "use" Marcus, but to honor him by making his death a disgrace and shame.

Right now, in every county in Ohio they have program auditors - the oddity is that these auditors who are suppose to identify violations of law, risks to their mission, and advice as to needed policy - are working side by side with the social workers, managers and administrators.

I have advocated for years that all program auditors be removed fromthe daily contact with the very staff they are supposed to be reviewing and the policy implementers they are supposed to be addressing.

Unfortunately,these program monitors / auditors remain in close liaisons with department workers and that incredibly hinders effective review, recommendations and progress on behalf of the children.

Maybe Strickland could direct all program auditors out of house insteaqd of in house where commaraderie and acquiesce (sic) are prolific (sic)

Thanks for reminding us

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck