*

*
Politics Extra
Enquirer reporters give the scoop on what your politicians are doing


Jessica Brown,
Hamilton County reporter


Jon Craig,
Enquirer statehouse bureau


Jane Prendergast,
Cincinnati City Hall reporter


Malia Rulon,
Enquirer Washington bureau


Carl Weiser,
Blog editor


Howard Wilkinson,
politics reporter

Powered by Blogger

Monday, October 10, 2005

More endorsements for Mallory

Richard Finan, left, then president-elect of the Ohio Senate, took over the gavel from retiring Senate President Stanley J. Aronoff in 1996. (Photo by Elizabeth Ellis/The Associated Press)

Stanley J. Aronoff and Richard Finan ran the Ohio Senate during a less partisan time in Columbus, when the Cincinnati delegation had some clout and Republicans worked with Democrats like state Rep. William L. Mallory Sr. to get things done for the region.

Today, the two former Senate presidents endorsed Mallory's son, state Sen. Mark L. Mallory, D-West End, for mayor of Cincinnati.

"At this particular time, I think that we need a healer. I think that Sen. Mallory is the right person at the right time to heal some of the differences in our city," Aronoff said after a Mallory event at Findlay Market this afternoon. "I think he's got a good heart. I have seen how he handles adversity. I think he makes an effort to get things done."

Did we mention that Aronoff and Finan are Republicans?

The endorsements are part of Mallory's strategy to establish his resume as a consensus builder. The campaign said voters should expect to see a number of endorsements over the next few weeks -- from Republicans and Democrats -- in order to back up that claim.

Mallory's opponent, Councilman David Pepper, didn't dispute Aronoff's and Finan's reputations as lawmakers. It's their current jobs that he said were a problem.

"Mark Mallory was today endorsed by two of the most active lobbyists in Columbus," Pepper said. "Last week it was Statehouse politicians. Today it was Statehouse lobbyists."

Finan represents, among others, Queen City Barrel in Lower Price Hill; Aronoff's clients include BP America and the Beer and Wine Wholesalers Association.


12 Comments:

at 5:58 AM, October 11, 2005 Blogger Someone said...

Mallory was endorsed by lobbyists? Well, Mr. Pepper, you were endorsed by Wendell Walker, who was arrested for unlawful sexual conduct with a minor. How did you respond? By simply deleting his endorsement from your page — sans comment, sans denouncement, sans anything.

 
at 11:09 AM, October 11, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Deane- your hero Pepper accepted a $1000 donation from Dick Weiland, a prominent lobbyist, so you may not want to be so quick to bash the support of lobbyists.

 
at 11:41 AM, October 11, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

FYI Stan Aronoff is Jewish & he doesn't seem to be bothered by Mallory's other endorsements. My point was not to bash Weiland, I know and like him. Don't trash Mallory for having support of lobbyists if Pepper also accepts their support.

 
at 2:05 PM, October 11, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes, we all know how the Dean feels about Pepper. I for one am sick of hearing him talk about it. Dean, you employ the exact tactics you claim the Pepper camp uses. You say that Pepper is using the Black Fist endorsement as a smokescreen to avoid talking about any other issue, but then you can't stop bringing up Wendell Walker. WE GET IT ALREADY!!

 
at 2:47 PM, October 11, 2005 Blogger Someone said...

The "We" in your comment above do not apparently get it, because we still have the hack reporting jobs by people like Greg Korte -- who largely slips his bias through manipulating the so-called objectivity of the journalistic style sheet.

Korte decides to post this drivel criticizing the endorsements of Mallory, but he will not turn this same "objective" eye onto the controversies surrounding his man. Unacceptable.

Another point, too. My own site's posts offer at least some reasons and bits of evidence to support my view. I fail to understand the problem in demonstrating reasons why one candidate is better than another.

If we are going to keep looking at Mallory's endorsements, and controversies around them, we should do the same for Pepper. At the end of the day, we should weight what the total of each says about each candidate.

 
at 3:05 PM, October 11, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your site is biased and your "reasons and bits of evidence" largely consists of just stating that you believe one side to be true over the other. Your opinion is not fact, Dean and as the host of "Cincinnati's Intellectual Headquarters", you should be able to recognize the difference. I was simply pointing out that your pompous attitude and ranting biased opinions have become tiresome and repetitive.

 
at 3:35 PM, October 11, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

The only Republicans that count are those that live in the City of Cincinnati. At this point Mallory has only gotten support of suburban Republicans who are more concerned with Pepper's future than the city. I've been asked who are the "Republicans for Pepper"? Well, I guess the answer lies in the results of the Primary, when thousands of them voted for David Pepper and not CRepublican candidate. So, until Mallory actually gets thousands of Republicans to vote for him, the group "Republicans for Pepper" are the large number who have already voted for him.
P Witte

 
at 6:20 PM, October 11, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

To "the Peters"-you both live up to your name...

 
at 11:46 AM, October 12, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Wieland is a stand up guy!"

Wow, that's not what I usually think of when referencing people who have done time for tax fraud.

 
at 1:31 PM, October 13, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Witte-so now that John Glenn is endorsing your guy Pepper, guess it doesn't count since Glenn doesn't live in Cincinnati.

 
at 9:12 PM, October 13, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pete,

You still did not answer the question. Since Mr. Glenn does not live in Cincinnati his endorsement is reviewed by Mr. Pepper as meaningless, correct?

Or is the David Pepper double standard rule in effect?

Also since Mr. Pepper is having people investigated who speak out against him, where does Tim Burke's abuse of office and power for Pepper's personal gain stand as far as having the "Vote for me because I am white robocalls".

I find it odd that the postcard investigation was so much more important than the calls that implied Mr. Pepper was a racist.

 
at 5:42 PM, October 14, 2005 Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why so you can turn my name of to the Pepper squad and have me silenced, like the Pepper Patrol has done to so many others who speak out against his wrong doing.

I don't want your answer now that I know that it is Peter Deane and not Pete "Pepper" Witte.

 
Post a Comment*

* Our online blogs currently are hosted and operated by a third party, namely, Blogger.com. You are now leaving the Cincinnati.Com website and will be linked to Blogger.com's registration page. The Blogger.com site and its associated services are not controlled by Cincinnati.Com and different terms of use and privacy policy will apply to your use of the Blogger.com site and services.

By proceeding and/or registering with Blogger.com you agree and understand that Cincinnati.Com is not responsible for the Blogger.com site you are about to access or for any service you may use while on the Blogger.com site.

<< Home


Blogs
Jim Borgman
Today at the Forum
Paul Daugherty
Politics Extra
N. Ky. Politics
Pop culture review
Cincytainment
Who's News
Television
Roller Derby Diva
Art
CinStages Buzz....
The Foodie Report
cincyMOMS
Classical music
John Fay's Reds Insider
Bengals
High school sports
NCAA
UC Sports
CiN Weekly staff
Soundcheck